T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2504.1 | Look for Paul's Gospel :-) | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Wed Mar 31 1993 10:01 | 5 |
| Paul Marchant has pronounced on CDA pre-reqs in here before. If you
can't find his note, and even if you can, perhaps it's a question that
you should be asking of the CDA group.
Graham
|
2504.2 | POinter to where the guru last spoke | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist! | Wed Mar 31 1993 18:53 | 7 |
| Chele,
I believe the note GAP is thinking of is 1230.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
2504.3 | SSA says not | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Ajax, Ajax, Ajax... | Wed Mar 31 1993 19:52 | 28 |
| Hello,
>They do not wish to have either DECwindows OR Motif on their system.
>The SPD says they must....
>Would CDA RTS alleviate this problem, or are they just going to have to
>install DECwindows?
The SSA of CDA 2.0 says CDA RTS should do it:
SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS
For Systems Using Character Cell Terminals Only
(No DECwindows Interface):
o OpenVMS Operating System V5.4
o CDA Runtime Services for OpenVMS V1.4
(also known as CDA Base Services)
o DECimage Application Services for OpenVMS V2.0
(when using TIFF or MacPaint� converters)
o DEC GKS for OpenVMS V4.2 (Runtime System only - when using Graph-
ics converter)
Regards,
Jan
|
2504.4 | Who makes the rules? | GIDDAY::BURT | Chele Burt - CSC Sydney, DTN 7355693 | Thu Apr 01 1993 01:51 | 14 |
| Hello,
To whom can I direct a formal enquiry about this? The CDA product manager, or
the ALL-IN-1 product manager? We have other customers here who don't want
DECwindows/Motif.
The ALL-IN-1 V3 SPD contradicts the CDA V2 SSA. The customer isn't entitled to
instal CDA V2 (even tho' it's on the CD, & 1.1 isn't)
I know it's April 1st, but this is starting to seem really daft.
Thanks & regards,
Chele
|
2504.5 | Replying from the past | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist! | Thu Apr 01 1993 02:48 | 7 |
| Chele,
Both?
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks - still 4 hours away from Apr 1st
|
2504.6 | DECwindows *was* a pre-req for CDA when V3.0 shipped | HORLIX::paul | I'd sink therefore I swam | Thu Apr 01 1993 13:00 | 11 |
| ALL-IN-1 V3.0 predates the CDA converter library V2.0, and the
information in the V3.0 SPD was correct ``at the time of going to
press''. The requirement for DECwindows was explicitly spelt out for
V3.0, since a number of customers didn't realise that DECwindows was
a pre-requisite (then) for CDA.
Since ALL-IN-1 has no requirement for DECwindows, I see no reason why it
shouldn't work with the CDArt product.
Cheers,
Paul.
|