[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

2454.0. "RNA failed to create new VMS UIC record" by OSLACT::BJARNEC_P (The last boat left without me .....) Tue Mar 23 1993 15:21

Hi,

One of our customers have had a problem in that they have
renamed a couple of users' ALL-IN-1 accounts, at the same
time requesting the VMS account details also to be changed.

After the RNA (specifying both the new VMS and ALL-IN-1 
account details) the following was the status:

	- Old UAF Record, but none for the new VMS user name
	- Physical directory structure moved (i.e. to new VMS
	  directory)
	- ALL-IN-1 profile not changed (i.e. no profile for
	  the new user).

I have managed to sort this out for them by various manual 
changes, but the user still have some users to be moved and,
also for the hell of it, would like to know what goes wrong.

I have tried both STARS and this conf but without finding
anything substantial to enable me to give the customer a
deecent answer.  Is this a bug?

The disk that the account was moved from (and to, DISK2 logical
name) is not defined as concealed device, but depending on what
device name the RENAME utility uses, they have some defined
with trans=consealed.  All of these, however, point directly
to the hardware device (top level) like: 

	"DISK$KILDE" [exec] = "$1$DUA2:" [concealed,terminal]
	"DISK2" [exec] = "$1$DUA2:"


Would really appreciate if someone could help out or comment 
on this!


Thanks,

	Bjarne
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2454.1OSLACT::BJARNEC_PThe last boat left without me .....Tue Mar 23 1993 15:3710
OH yeah!

There was nothing interesting in the OA$LIB:*RENA*.* log
files - no error messages and so on.

I have supplied both the log files below (1 for each of the
users they tried to move.....).

*** LOG FILE REMOVED (FOR NOW!) TO IOSG::NOTES$LIBRARY:ALL-IN-1_2454_1.LOG ***
*** GRAHAM

2454.2Anything happening ?OSL09::NWOSTE::Bjarnec_pThe last boat left without meThu Mar 25 1993 15:5214
Hi again,


This is the same customer as has the problem described in note 2446 and he 
is starting to get a bit impatient with me.  Please post 
comments/solutions or, at least, a statement to the extent of: "we know 
about the problem and are/will be doing something about it" type of thing!

Waiting ..........


Thanks and regards,

		Bjarne
2454.3unable to replicate as yetIOSG::TYLDESLEYYou don't wanna do it like that..Thu Mar 25 1993 16:4817
    Bjarne,
    
    Please remember that we investigate problems mentioned here in our
    spare time between doing other tasks.
    
    Could you please supply:
    1) examples of the exact ALL-IN-1 usernames involved    
    2) examples of the exact VMS usernames involved      
    3) examples of the exact default login directories   
    
    If appropriate, e.g. in the ALL-IN-1 username, please show any
    multi-national characters.
    
    We have an enhanced logging facility here for Rename, and will try to 
    replicate the problem with your examples. 
                                                          
    DaveT
2454.4Thanks Dave - here's some more ....!OSL09::NWOSTE::Bjarnec_pThe last boat left without meThu Mar 25 1993 17:0929
Dave,


Your help is much appreciated, indeed (did not mean to sound ungrateful)!  

Examples of ALL-IN-1 usernames are: 	NFBAERAAS
					NFOPLAND

VMS usernames are the same as the ALL-IN-1 usernames, repectively.


Default login directories are:	DISK2:[NFOPLAND] (from Authorize)
				DISK2:[NFOPLAND.OA] (from A1 Profile)
			and
				DISK2:[NFBAERAAS]
				DISK2:[NFBAERAAS.OA]

These are the details RESULTING from the RNA.  If you need info on what 
these were before the RNA I need to get back to see if the customer can 
remember.  They are, however, going to Rename another one, so if you tell 
me how and what they can do to capture some more info, I'll pass it on to 
the customer.  If they can set verify/trace inside any of the files that 
are part of the RNA process, then we may get some more stuff.  I just need 
to know how.


Cheers,

	Bjarne
2454.5try this firstIOSG::TYLDESLEYYou don't wanna do it like that..Thu Mar 25 1993 17:2325
    Hi Bjarne,
    
    Thanks for the information. It would be helpful if the customer could
    supply the original usernames from before the RNA, though this may be a
    'red herring'!
    
    Meanwhile, for starters, I will supply you the SM_RENAME.SCP that I am
    using here. It provides much better RNA logging, and perhaps will
    indicate to your customer what is going wrong. If they are using V3.0
    then this should patch easily onto it, by copying it to OA$LIB: (be sure
    to check though, that the file ownership is the same as all the other
    SM scripts and coms in OA$LIB:, otherwise A1SUBMIT will throw up. See
    if you can get it patched before they attempt the next users.   
    
    If, as may well happen, this enhanced log does not show the problem,
    then we will have to do as you suggest, and set some trace and verify
    in the Rename procedure, to investigate further. If the need comes to
    do this, I will show you how and where.
    
    Meanwhile, a colleague is currently tackling a number of known problems
    with RNA. I'll talk to him to see if any that he knows of, could be
    causing your difficulties.
    
    Cheers,                                                   
    DaveT
2454.6possibly this one....?IOSG::TYLDESLEYYou don't wanna do it like that..Thu Mar 25 1993 17:5526
    Bjarne,
    
    I have sent you a copy of sm_rename.scp that could be patched on their
    system. 
    
    A hunt through our database showed this one:
    
"Title: RENAME ACCOUNT FAILS ON LOGICAL DRIVE                             
                                                                                
Rename of account fails if VMS account is held on a device pointed to by a
rooted logical.

The customer attempted an SM MUA RNA operation on a users account. After the
job completed they found that they still had the old Profile as well as the
newly named Profile, but the new Profile still pointed to the original VMS
account. However there were no errors in the log file.
The customer is now aware that this situation is due to them using rooted
logicals to point to the directory structures' in question. They have been able
to use the workaround of creating a dummy MFD [00000] for the device. However
they find this unacceptable as a long term solution. They have many many
accounts set up in this way (and have had for several versions of ALL-IN-1) and
may need to do large scale Renames. They therefore request that this problem is
rectified in the future."
    
	This may be fixed in a possible future release ;-)
    	DaveT
2454.7Details of old accounts + can't find SM*.SCP fileOSL09::NWOSTE::Bjarnec_pThe last boat left without meFri Mar 26 1993 10:4728
Dave,


Thanks very much for you help with this!


Details for the old users are:

	TPBAERAAS renamed to NFBAERAAS  
	TPOPLAND renamed to NFOPLAND
	(Same disk for default login =(DISK2)befor and after RNA, VMS 
	directory changed according to name change (i.e. from TP* to NF*, 
	ALL-IN-1 user name same as VMS acc name for each user)

Customer says that he specified passwords for the Renamed accounts that may 
well already have been defined in the VMS PW History file.  Perhaps this 
could affect the RNA?  He was asking,if this was the case, should he expect 
an error message (which he did not get) or could the whole RNA fail?

B.T.W., I can not seem to find the new SM*.SCP file you sent me.  Could you 
please resend to OSL10::BJARNEC_P or copy to OSL10:: and I will give it to 
the customer before he does his next RNA (possibly today).


Thanks,

	Bjarne

2454.8Disk is not defined as concealed deviceOSL09::NWOSTE::Bjarnec_pThe last boat left without meFri Mar 26 1993 12:2713
Dave,

Forgot to answer your question re. whether or not the device these users 
are on is defined as a concealed device.  It is defined as follows:

	DEFI/SYS/EXEC DISK2 $1$DUA2:

..... so that should not be the problem.


Regards,

	Bjarne