[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:	OLD ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:	Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:	IOSG::PYE

Created:	Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:	Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	4343
Total number of notes:	18308

2443.0. "Flagging Documents as Proprietary" by RESTRT::LATIMER (Eastern States Product Support) Fri Mar 19 1993 20:50

I have a customer who is interested in "marking" their documents as 
company proprietary, possibly by using DOCDB to flag such documents.  I 
noticed that there is a new field in DOCDB called SENSITIVITY, described in 
the Application Programming Reference Guide, Volume 1, page 8-11, as follows:

SENSITIVITY	Field available for use by X.400-compliant applications.
		Possible values are:

			0, indicating that the document is not sensitive
			1, indicating that the document is personal
			2, indicating that the document is private
			3, indicating that the document is company confidential


Does this field sound like a good candidate to use for this purpose?  Is this
field currently used at all, and would I be trampling on some possible 
future use for it...or is this exactly the type of application it was
designed for?

I also read in Tony's Version 3.0 book that there is a field called
CUSTOMER (6 bytes) available for customer use in DOCDB.  Would this be
better to use?

Or is there an alternate method preferable to any of this?

Thanks for any suggestions.


Nancy

T.R Title User Personal
Name Date Lines

2443.1 CUSTOMER is a very old field AIMTEC::WICKS_A Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist! Fri Mar 19 1993 21:20 12

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
2443.1	CUSTOMER is a very old field	AIMTEC::WICKS_A	Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist!	`Fri Mar 19 1993 21:20`	12
	Nancy, interesting that SENSITIVITY is documented and CUSTOMER isn't since CUSTOMER has been in ALL-IN-1 since v2.0 I'll avoid possible use of this field type questions - unless you've seen the PID that is - but all these fields are documented in the Internals and Data Structures manual which i'm sure you have a copy of! Regards, Andrew.D.Wicks

    Nancy,
    
    interesting that SENSITIVITY is documented and CUSTOMER isn't since
    CUSTOMER has been in ALL-IN-1 since v2.0
    
    I'll avoid possible use of this field type questions - unless you've
    seen the PID that is - but all these fields are documented in the
    Internals and Data Structures manual which i'm sure you have a copy of!
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks