Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hello, One of my customer has the following problem: With ALL-IN-1 3.0-1 french and SMU option. When using SMU option he often have no unread count mail. It is an important pb for him because it happens to a secretary consulting her manager's mail . She didn't see the message about new mail and did not read new mail. In fact there where important mails waiting for read and process. The system manager had tested this option and the pb appened twice each ten test. I tested this on my own machine. The result is worth. The unread mail count corespond with the reader's one. How is filled the unread mail count when using smu option? Is this problem known? Thanks for any help. Genevieve MORVAN
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2421.1 | known problem | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist! | Tue Mar 16 1993 16:41 | 14 |
Genevieve, I believe that this is a known restriction with SMU please see the STARS article entitled "SMU And New Mail Broadcast Messages" see below When using the Set Mail User (SMU) option, the new mail broadcast messages you receive pertain to your own mail account NOT the user whose mail you are currently set to use. This is a restriction in the current version of ALL-IN-1 V3.0. Regards, Andrew.D.Wicks | |||||
2421.2 | I have mixed two problems | EVTAI1::MORVAN | Wed Mar 17 1993 15:48 | 14 | |
Hi, Thanks for your answer. I have mixed txo differents pb . 1) effectively in 3.0 (on my configuration) the pb of unread mail count pertains to the "reader" . This pb has been fixed withe 3.0-1 version. My customer has this patch and doesnot have my pb. 2) His pb is that the new mail broadcast message does not always appears when doing SMU. Is it a restriction of the version? Thanks . Genevieve |