T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2403.1 | Questions... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri Mar 12 1993 08:24 | 11 |
| I can't see this in my version of the OVERQUOTA form. What is the next
few lines of named data after the ';;;;'?
The only thing I can think of is that one of the menu option symbols
referenced in the named data is not defined, or perhaps the form
library has got corrupted... What language is this system? Does the
form look OK from CTRL/N before you try to customise it?
Graham
PS I fixed the "can" to a "can't" in your base note and deleted your .1
|
2403.3 | 6? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist! | Fri Mar 12 1993 15:07 | 16 |
| Banquo,
The correct number of ; would be 6 for a null piece of named data
what happens if you use 6 and try and exit.
the only place in the 'base' kit i've ever seen this used was on form
SA after the install of the TCP thing which is how i found out that
particular incantation of magic character insertion to satisfy the
create and powerful Gods of Script and Named Data compiling
Like the gentlemen in .1 and .2 I don't have this particular
named data on form OVERQUOTA
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
2403.4 | should be MBI | CROCKE::YUEN | Banquo Yuen, Darwin Australia | Mon Mar 15 1993 07:24 | 10 |
| Hello
I check with the old (V2.4) overquota form, the name data should
be MBI. The software is installed from saveset on nov92 CD.
I looked at another V3.0 system which have been installed for
9 months, the same thinkg, ie ;;;;, in the overquota form.
Thanks
Banquo
|
2403.5 | | IOSG::MAURICE | Because of the architect the building fell down | Mon Mar 15 1993 08:14 | 11 |
| Hi,
Yes you're right. It was ;OA$_MO_OQ_MBI;; and should have been
;;OA$_MO_OQ_MBI;;
We have fixed this in the PFR, so you don't need to SPR it. You can use
CM to fix it yourself if you wish.
Cheers
Stuart
|