| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2366.1 | What did the CART Report say? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri Mar 05 1993 15:44 | 15 |
| The error about delete-w-searchfail is well documented, and can be
ignored. I expect the other error is because you are still using an old
version of a script somewhere.
It's normal for all .FLBs to require recompilation after an upgrade, we
can't find them all to do this automatically.
Did you run the CART before the upgrade?
It would almost certainly have told you that you had a customised
version of the DEFAUL form, which is still in use after the upgrade,
and is calling the old version of the SM form, which isn't there
anymore.
Graham
|
| 2366.2 | Upgrade for both applications | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | I dreamt I found a working printer! | Fri Mar 05 1993 16:17 | 9 |
| Wade,
Also both SYSTIDY and TeamRoute will require upgrading - a version
of SYSTIDY is available from the usual source but TeamRoute is not
yet available for v3.0 (an FT kit may be available - see ABBOTT::EBD)
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
| 2366.3 | SYSTIDY/SYSUSER savesets pointer | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Mon Mar 08 1993 06:33 | 6 |
| I plan on installing SYSTIDY/SYSUSER which can be incorporated with the
ALL-IN-1 V3.0, but I need help to provide me the pointer of the name of
savesets, node and directory path.
I wish that my problems can be eliminated a bit after I upgrade the
SYSTIDY/SYSUSER. Thanks!
|
| 2366.4 | SYSTIDY not spoken here | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | I dreamt I found a working printer! | Mon Mar 08 1993 15:09 | 6 |
| SYSTIDY/SYSUSER can be obtained from your local MTS Manager or from
the MTS Toolkit notesfile.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
| 2366.5 | There is no such drawer | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Thu Apr 01 1993 12:33 | 14 |
| Hi!
I completed the v3.0 upgrade from v2.4 and having a problem while I enter
"EM" at the main menu:
"There is no such drawer"
I know there is no drawer implementation in v2.4, but I need the pointer
to guide me to the proper menu (e.g. where to get on-line v3.0 Users Guide)
or solution against this problem.
Thank you in advance!
Wade
|
| 2366.6 | Empty language | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | April 28 : the return of Marco | Thu Apr 01 1993 13:02 | 10 |
| Wade,
Looks like this accounts language field is empty.
Did you see note 2239 ?
Regards,
Jan
|
| 2366.7 | File Cabinet Server is not available | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri Apr 02 1993 11:49 | 19 |
| Hi!
I am suspecting that my problem was because of the errors in starting
local File Cabinet Server during installation, I got below message
during installation:
File Cabinet Server TPOM09::"73=" is not available
The default MAIN drawers have NOT been seeded
Please check the log file SYS$MANAGER:OAFC$SERVER.LOG
I did enter "NCP> tell iosg show object OBJ_73 characteristic", and
only got the OBJ_73 object number and process id in return from remote
node IOSG, please help me with the Object Name, File/Id and User Id in
defining the object 73 in order to start my File Cabinet Server.
Thank you again!
Wade
|
| 2366.8 | Seeding did not work | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Tue Apr 06 1993 15:48 | 9 |
|
to start the FCS, go into the ALLIN1 account and go into the
MANAGER A1 account, do SM MFC MS STA
If this does nto start the FCS, check the log file like the message
in .6 says to. It sounds as if partition seeding did not work.
--Bob
|
| 2366.9 | start FCS did not work | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Wed Apr 07 1993 13:02 | 47 |
| Hi! Bob,
I did try your approach, but it did'nt start the FCS, I got the below logs:
===================== SYS$MANAGER:OAFC$SERVER.LOG ============================
7-APR-1993 11:44:22.62 Server: TPOM09::"73="
Error: %RMS-E-DNF, directory not found Message: CsiStart;
Error performing $parse of SDAF file
===================== OA$LOG:OAFC$SERVER_STARTUP.LOG =========================
$ set nover
%SYSTEM-W-NOTALLPRIV, not all requested privileges authorized
************************************************************************
%RUN-S-PROC_ID, identification of created process is 20200347
Server is being started:
configuration_file: OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.DATA_SHARE]TPOM09$SERVER73.
DAT;1
process_name: TPOM09$SRV73
************************************************************************
ALLIN1 job terminated at 7-APR-1993 11:44:14.53
========================== SYS$MANAGER:OAFC$SERVER_ERROR.LOG ===================
Error opening OA$DISK:[OA$SHARC]OA$DAF_C.DAT
================================================================================
I did set the protection to all on the OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.DATA_SHARE]TPOM09$SERVER
73.DAT after reviewing these log files; Also, I could not find the OA$DISK:
[OA$SHARC]OA$DAF_C.DAT file in response to the OAFC$SERVER_ERROR.LOG file, but
I still failed again and got the same error LOG files. Could you do me some
more help in this problem?
Thanks.
Wade
|
| 2366.10 | Check some UAF-settings: UIC, ID, Flag... | EEMELI::SALMINEN | I'm just a singer in an ALL-IN-1 band | Wed Apr 07 1993 14:30 | 39 |
| I don't know if the following solves your problem but it is
worth to check the following details.
I was doing an v2.4 -> v3.0 in a bank customer (typically)
starting at 6 pm on Friday ("and everything MUST work on Sunday
evening!") and had the same error message when trying
to run ALL-IN-1 after failed post-installation.
>>> The error message was due to failed partition seeding. <<<
Detailed analysis uncovered the following errors:
1. Due to improper Rightslist ID of the SYSTEM account,
the Identifier OAFC$SYSMAN was not granted to
account SYSTEM. Try the following:
UAF> GRANT/ID SYSTEM OAFC$SYSMAN
2. Because DEFAULT account had DISUSER-flag, this flag
was copied during upgrade to accounts OAFC$SERVER and
OAFC$DEFAULT preventing FCS operating at all. Try
the following commands:
UAF> MODIFY OAFC$SERVER /FLAGS=NODISUSER /ACCESS /NOEXP
UAF> MODIFY OAFC$DEFAULT /FLAGS=NODISUSER /ACCESS /NOEXP
And check also possible other access restrictions.
After the above mentioned corrections, and after running
the post-install procedure again, the error message was
still found when using some user accounts.
3. Check that the user accounts have unique UIC:s and
Rightslist Identifier:s, if they don't have such,
the partition seeding will fail to them.
HTH
Hannu Salminen,
T&C, Finland
|
| 2366.11 | Try this | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Wed Apr 07 1993 15:43 | 24 |
|
It looks like there are two problems,
1) The FCS can't find one of the SDAF's
2) The account starting the FCS (OAFC$SERVER if starting detached)
does not have the privs.
do what .10 suggests, then check the server start up command file and
look for the section where it checks for needed privs, verify that
oafc$server has these.
If still in doubt do the followign:
$ A1FCS :== $sys$system:oafc$server.exe
$ a1fcs your_server_config_file
This will start the server up in the foreground (rather than
a detached process). Do this from an account that has alot of privs
like SYSTEM or ALLIN1, see what this does, it will log any errors
to the screen.
--Bob
|
| 2366.12 | Empty Mail Area with missing SDAF ? | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Ajax, Ajax, Ajax... | Thu Apr 08 1993 08:22 | 18 |
| re.9
>Error opening OA$DISK:[OA$SHARC]OA$DAF_C.DAT
Perhaps this system has an empty (unused) Mail Area.
Use SM MMA to check wether mail area OA$SHARC does exist.
Perhaps it was empty/unused and someone just deleted the
SDAF. Try SELecting OA$SHAREC. If the Delete option (which checks
for emptyness of the area) cannot find
the SADF, use SM_SDAF_MASTER to remove the record. I am not sure
wether FCS "knows" about mail areas but I expect it uses the
ALL-IN-1 data file instead of the logicals. So you don't
have to run the A1V30START.COM....
Hope this helps,
Jan
|
| 2366.14 | Why .13 is hidden | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Oscar the Grouch is an Optimist! | Fri Apr 09 1993 16:07 | 7 |
| The previous note is set hidden because it contained an account name
and password of a privileged account which I believe is against
normal DIGITAL security policies
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
| 2366.15 | Reposted minus password | IOSG::TALLETT | Gimmee an Alpha colour notebook... | Tue Apr 13 1993 10:24 | 50 |
| <<< IOSG::LIB0:[NOTES$LIBRARY]ALL-IN-1.NOTE;3 >>>
-< ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference >-
================================================================================
Note 2366.13 ALL-IN-1 v2.4 to v3.0 upgrade problem 13 of 14
TPOVC::WADEJENG 42 lines 9-APR-1993 12:24
-< ERROR STARTING SERVER TPOM09::"73=" again >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi!
I did try the following:
UAF> GRANT/ID OAFC$SYSMAN SYSTEM
UAF> MODIFY OAFC$SERVER /FALGS=NODISUSER /ACCESS /NOEXP
UAF> MODIFY OAFC$DEFAULT /FALGS=NODISUSER /ACCESS /NOEXP
and then ran the postinstallation procedure again: OA$LIB:A1$POSTINSTALL.COM,
but I still failed on ERROR STARTING SERVER TPOM09::"73=".. etc.
I even tried to do the following:
$ a1fcs :== $sys$system:oafc$server.exe
$ a1fcs oa$data_share:tpom09$server73.dat (which is my server configu-
ration file)
but, I ended up with the following messages:
9-APR-1993 19:03:08.11 Server: TPOM09::"73=" Error: %RMS-E-DNF,
directory not found Message: CsiStart; Error performing $parse of SDAF file
Error opening OA$DISK:[OA$SHARC]OA$DAF_C.DAT
%RMS-E-DNF, directory not found
-NONAME-W-NOMSG, Message number 00000000
They all looked alike with the messages I got in .9.
Can someone please log into my system:
Node: TPOM09
Account: ALLIN1
Password: ********* [password deleted by moderator]
have a close look and please try not to delete any files; I would be very
appreciated if I can get the problems fixed with someone's help.
The log files for your reference:
TPOM09::SYS$MANAGER:OAFC$SERVER.LOG
TPOM09::SYS$MANAGER:OAFC$SERVER_ERROR.LOG
TPOM09::OA$LOG:OAFC$SERVER_STARTUP.LOG
Good luck to you and then me!
Wade
|
| 2366.16 | OA$SHARC is not setup correctly | IOSG::TALLETT | Gimmee an Alpha colour notebook... | Tue Apr 13 1993 10:34 | 76 |
|
You seem to have a half-created OA$SHARC which is annoying the
File Cab server (seems reasonable to me). I'll leave it to
someone else to guess how this happened and suggest a fix.
Here's what I did:
Username: ALLIN1
Password:
Welcome to VAX/VMS version V5.5-2 on node TPOM09
Last interactive login on Tuesday, 13-APR-1993 11:32
Last non-interactive login on Tuesday, 13-APR-1993 14:00
You have 5 new Mail messages.
%SYSTEM-W-NOTALLPRIV, not all requested privileges authorized
M09 A1> sho log oa$disk
"OA$DISK" = "$1$DIA1:" (LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
M09 A1> dir oa$disk:[OA$SHARC]
%DIRECT-E-OPENIN, error opening OA$DISK:[OA$SHARC]*.*;* as input
-RMS-E-DNF, directory not found
-SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHFILE, no such file
M09 A1> sho log oa$sh*
(LNM$PROCESS_TABLE)
(LNM$JOB_80921E80)
(LNM$GROUP_000001)
(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE)
"OA$SHARC" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARC]"
"OA$SHARC1" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARC.SHARC1]"
"OA$SHARC_HIGH" = " 1"
"OA$SHARC_LOW" = " 1"
"OA$SHARE" = "OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SHARED_E]"
"OA$SHARE1" = "OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SHARE1]"
"OA$SHARE10" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE10]"
"OA$SHARE11" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE11]"
"OA$SHARE12" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE12]"
"OA$SHARE13" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE13]"
"OA$SHARE14" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE14]"
"OA$SHARE15" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE15]"
"OA$SHARE16" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE16]"
"OA$SHARE17" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE17]"
"OA$SHARE18" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE18]"
"OA$SHARE19" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE19]"
"OA$SHARE2" = "OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SHARE2]"
"OA$SHARE20" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE20]"
"OA$SHARE21" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE21]"
"OA$SHARE22" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE22]"
"OA$SHARE23" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE23]"
"OA$SHARE24" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE24]"
"OA$SHARE25" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE25]"
"OA$SHARE26" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE26]"
"OA$SHARE27" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE27]"
"OA$SHARE28" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE28]"
"OA$SHARE29" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE29]"
"OA$SHARE3" = "OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SHARE3]"
"OA$SHARE30" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE30]"
"OA$SHARE4" = "OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SHARE4]"
"OA$SHARE5" = "OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SHARE5]"
"OA$SHARE6" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE6]"
"OA$SHARE7" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE7]"
"OA$SHARE8" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE8]"
"OA$SHARE9" = "OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE9]"
"OA$SHARE_HIGH" = " 30"
"OA$SHARE_LOW" = " 11"
(DECW$LOGICAL_NAMES)
M09 A1> dir oa$sharc:
%DIRECT-E-OPENIN, error opening OA$DISK:[OA$SHARC]*.*;* as input
-RMS-E-DNF, directory not found
-SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHFILE, no such file
M09 A1> lo
ALLIN1 logged out at 13-APR-1993 16:35:16.41
|
| 2366.17 | Further... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue Apr 13 1993 11:55 | 11 |
| There's obviously a record in the Shared DAF master, which is causing
this logical to get defined. From the Manager's account, call up the
form SM_SDAF_MASTER and see what records are in it. You might want to
delete the duff one for DAF C, and then rerun A1V30START to get the
logicals defined. Actually, you'll need to *DEASSIGN* that one manually
of course!
If there are any shared area logicals for DAF C, they'll be defined by
records in the form SM_SHARED_DIR_MASTER. Remove them in a similar way.
Graham
|
| 2366.18 | EMHEAD compiling error | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Mon Apr 26 1993 05:12 | 20 |
| Hi!
I did get my "MAIN drawer missing" problem fixed by creating a mail
area-SHARC which corresponding to the OA$SHARC logical and copied
the oa$sdaf_e.dat to oa$sdaf_c.dat, then did "sm mfc ms sta"
accordingly, and could get to the EM form impressively. Thank you for
your helps.
But, there was another problem raised - "error encountered compiling
form EMHEAD" while I tried to create a new mail, the first panel I got
was the panel for editing the input content but not the message header
panel for inputing the sender/receiver information.
I did try "cm sel" the "EMHEAD" form, and "cm mla" to mark to move to
live area, followed by "cm ma pme" to process marked elements, but I
still could not eliminate the EMHEAD compiling error;
Can someone help me with this problem? Thank you in advance.
Wade
|
| 2366.19 | What was in GOLD/W after error? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Mon Apr 26 1993 10:38 | 0 |
| 2366.20 | EMHEAD error reply again | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue Apr 27 1993 03:54 | 7 |
| Hi! Graham,
Could you please resend me your reply (2366.19) regarding my problem in
"error encountered compiling form EMHEAD", since the 2366.19 is a empty
reply. Thank you again!
Wade
|
| 2366.21 | EMHEAD form set | IOSG::HARDIE | In a world where the sun burns cold ! | Tue Apr 27 1993 11:32 | 6 |
|
Have you also moved the EMHEAD2 form to live??
Neil
~~~~
|
| 2366.22 | .19 only needed a title! More explanation... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue Apr 27 1993 14:16 | 16 |
| Re .20
.19 was supposed to be empty, the wuestion was in the title!
If you get an error about compiling a form, GOLD/W normally tells you
what the mising symbol, form or syntax error was.
Most commonly, as .21 sggests it's because you have a customised form
and not all the members of the form set are in the same library.
Another reason can be that you have an old (i.e. previous version of
ALL-IN-1) of a form in the site library, and it's using a message
symbol that we've removed in the current version. But the CART should
have told you about that.
Graham
|
| 2366.23 | more EMHEAD form compiling error | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Wed May 05 1993 03:44 | 32 |
| Hi!
I am puzzling why I am still getting "Error encountered compiling from
EMHEAD" while I am trying to exit from creating a new mail.
First, I entered the following commands to do the comparison:
base area:
$ fms/dir/full oa$lib:oaform/form=emhead
$ fms/dir/full oa$lib:oaform/form=emhead2
live area:
$ fms/dir/full oa$lib:siteoaform/form=emhead
$ fms/dir/full oa$lib:siteoaform/form=emhead2
I got exactly the same form with the same number of bytes and creation
date, which means there is no difference in these forms between the "live
area" and "base area".
Further, I entered GOLD/W at the error stage, I got the below information:
%OA-E-FLCCOMERR, Error encountered compiling form EMHEAD
-OA-E-FLCFRMSET, .FORM_SET form EMHEAD2 not found
But I did find the EMHEAD2 in both oa$lib:oaform.flb and oa$lib:siteoaform.
flb, how come the message said ".FORM_SET form EMHEAD2 not found"?
Question I have is that how can I get to the "Message Header" form in stead
of the editing form directly as the first panel?
Thank you again!
Wade
|
| 2366.24 | Can we use ALL-IN-1 to do this? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | on the Streets of San Francisco | Wed May 05 1993 04:24 | 16 |
| wade,
I must admit i'm a little confused but that's because I see you using
FMS commands directly at VMS level.
could you please go into ALL-IN-1 go to CM and check that when you do
an index you see that both EMHEAD and EMHEAD2 are there and both have
the live flag set to Y. If so can you then so to the CSZ menu and
PCF the form-library SITEOAFORM hopefully without errors.
I'd feel more comfortable if I saw you doing it inside ALL-IN-1
the way God or at least the relevant developer intended (:==:)
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
| 2366.25 | form compiling error still there | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Thu May 06 1993 07:43 | 21 |
| Hi! Andrew,
Thank you for your note reply first!
Please excuse me for confusing you about my steps in trouble-shooting.
I did enter "cm i" and got both EMHEAD and EMHEAD2 in the index list
with "FRM" as type, "ENGLISH" as area, "Free" as status, and "Y" as
live flag. After I entered "sm csz pcf" to pre-compile oa$lib:siteoaform
and got it pre-compiled with an message as follows:
Symbol OA$_TM_SRE_NUM_OF_WEEK not found for form TMSRE_STYLE3
But, I thought this message won't harm any of the ALL-IN-1 operation.
Then, I invoked ALL-IN-1 again, and entered "em c", I still got to
the editing mode directly, the "Message Header" panel still missing
and I won't be able to enter the receiver name and address.
Can you think of any other reason to cause this problem? Is it could
be the incorrect customization management search orders setting?
Wade
|
| 2366.26 | Trace | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | on the Streets of San Francisco | Thu May 06 1993 09:20 | 8 |
| Wade,
It's time for trace (GOLD %) and please don't post the whole of the log
here just the relevant (small) extract of it or a pointer to it.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
| 2366.27 | need more help on compiling error | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri May 07 1993 09:23 | 40 |
| Hi! Andrew,
I did press "GOLD %" to get a1trace.log, and I post the relevant extract of
it as below:
.......
.......
.......
![IO] Releasing record locks on CAB$PDAF
![FUNC] Function: FORM, Cmd line: EMHEAD
![A1LOG] Entry: %OA-I-LOGFUN, Function: FORM EMHEAD
![FORM] Form EMHEAD dispatching, Command:
![FLOW] Current field index: 6. Form context follows:
![FLOW] Form Name Dsab Workspace Prior Dsab
![FLOW] EMC 0030A3D8 0004603C 00000000
!
![IVP] Form: EMHEAD
![FORM] Form EMHEAD starting
![FORM] Form EMHEAD opening
![FORM] Form EMHEAD compiling
![A1LOG] Entry: %OA-I-LOGERROR, %OA-E-FLCCOMERR, Error encountered compiling fo
! rm EMHEAD
![A1LOG] Entry: %OA-I-LOGERROR, -OA-E-FLCFRMSET, .FORM_SET form EMHEAD2 not fou
! nd
![FLOW] Unable to find Form EMHEAD
![A1LOG] Entry: %OA-I-LOGERROR, %OA-E-FLCCOMERR, Error encountered compiling fo
! rm ![FUNC] Function: EDIT, Cmd line: "[.MSG]ZURBDYEFF.WPL
! ","",,"WPSPLUS"
.......
.......
.......
I wish this would lead you some direction of my "encountered form EMHEAD
compiling error" problem. If you need more data in my log file, please
look at the TPOM09::OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.MGR]A1TRACE.LOG. I set it readable to
world. Thank you for your help!
Wade
|
| 2366.28 | What I see. | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | on the Streets of San Francisco | Fri May 07 1993 17:42 | 10 |
| Wade,
sorry but I can't give this much more time (I have a day job you know!)
but look at the [FLOW] it says it can't even find form EMHEAD.
Have you called your CSC?
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
| 2366.29 | EMHEAD2 around? | SIOG::T_REDMOND | Thoughts of an Idle Mind | Sat May 08 1993 21:55 | 6 |
| Actually, it looks as if form EMHEAD2 can't be found in the library
where EMHEAD is being taken from. Have you moved all elements of the
EMHEAD form set into the live area? You may still have EMHEAD2 in the
development library.
Tony
|
| 2366.30 | EMHEAD did reside in live area | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue May 11 1993 11:16 | 24 |
| Hi! Tony,
Thank you first for your reply to my ALL-IN-1 error encountered compiling
form EMHEAD problem. I did positively move both EMHEAD and EMHEAD2 from
DEVELOP.FLB to live area (SITEOAFORM.FLB), and I checked the status by
entering "cm i", I got the following information displayed:
Index of Site Element
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Name Type Area Status Live
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 EMHEAD FRM ENGLISH Free Y
2 EMHEAD2 FRM ENGLISH Free Y
which meaned that EMHEAD and EMHEAD2 did reside in live area, was it
because I only had one single mail area - OA$SHARE or something wrong
went on in setting Customization Management search orders?
I am the one responsible for upgrading V2.4 to v3.0 for the entire Asia
region, I am wondering that my region have people would help me with my
problem. But, if you happen to know anyone in Asia region might have the
answer, please let me know. Thank you for your tiem and effort.
Wade
|
| 2366.31 | Check where we are finding the forms... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue May 11 1993 14:55 | 9 |
| Call up form EMHEAD with the FORM function:
<FORM EMHEAD
Then do CTRL/N to see what form library it's being found from. Repeat
this for EMHEAD2, in case you have another copy of either of them
coming from some other .FLB.
Graham
|
| 2366.32 | error in finding form EMHEAD | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri May 14 1993 03:17 | 16 |
| Hi! Graham,
I tried "<form emhead" command and got the following message:
Error encountered compiling form EMHEAD
Then, I tried "<form emhead2" again, and got the following message:
Error encountered while form EMHEAD2 was current
I pressed CTRL/N , and the form was "EMC", library was
"OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SITE.LIB_ENGLISH]SITEOAFORM.FLB", they seemed OK
to me. Graham, is there a ALL-IN-1 error message guide or trouble-shooting
menu around? if it does, please notice me the menu title. Thanks!
Wade
|
| 2366.33 | And in GOLD/W? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri May 14 1993 15:37 | 7 |
| Were both the forms in the *SAME* library? Since they're in the site
library, they obviously been customised, so you should make sure that
any message symbols etc. are correct.
What error details, if any, do you get in GOLD/W after each error?
Graham
|
| 2366.34 | EMHEAD and EMHEAD2 errors | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Mon May 17 1993 11:19 | 42 |
| Hi! Graham,
I tried "<form emhead" command and got the following error message:
Error encountered compiling form EMHEAD
and I did GOLD/W I got:
%OA-E-FLCCOMERR, Error encountered compiling form EMHEAD
-OA-E-FLCFRMSET, .FORM_SET form EMHEAD2 not found
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Then, I tried "<form emhead2" again, and got the following error message:
"Error encountered while form EMHEAD2 was current"
and I did GOLD/W I got:
%OA-E-EIF, Error encountered while form EMHEAD2 was current
-OA-E-NPARSE, Error parsing:
^ Error
-OA-E-FORMTYPE, Invalid type in form
Again, I did enter "cm i", I got the following information displayed as
in note .30.
Index of Site Element
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Name Type Area Status Live
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 EMHEAD FRM ENGLISH Free Y
2 EMHEAD2 FRM ENGLISH Free Y
I belive that the above information showing both the EMHEAD and MEHEAD2
reside in live area (OA$LIB:SITEOAFORM.FLB), and their status are free.
I don't know what's wrong with the type "FRM" of EMHEAD2 would cause
the invalid type in form?
Thanks!
Wade
|
| 2366.35 | I'm done! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Mon May 17 1993 18:26 | 10 |
| Um, I've misled you slightly. In fact, because EMHEAD2 doesn't have any
named data in it, you will always get the error if you call it
directly. BTW the form type error it's talking about is something like
ENTRY, MENU etc. But of course it finds an "error" because there is
*no* form type.
OK, I have no more ideas. You must be getting one or other of the forms
from some other library somehow, regardless of what CM says!
Graham
|
| 2366.36 | FIND_FORM returns? | IOSG::HULIN | Ian Hulin, IOSG: REO, DTN 830-6141 | Mon May 24 1993 11:01 | 21 |
| Wade,
What does FIND_FORM return you for EMHEAD and EMHEAD2? Try something like
the following:
<FIND_FORM(FORM="EMHEAD",OUT=#WADEJ_EMHEAD)\GET #WADEJ_EMHEAD_STAT = OA$STATUS
<FIND_FORM(FORM="EMHEAD2",OUT=#WADEJ_EMHEAD2)\GET #WADEJ_EMHEAD2_STAT = OA$STATUS
<EXAMINE(SYMBOLS="#*EMHEAD*")
This should at least tell you where the forms being used are actually being
picked up from. The statuses will also tell you whether they are being
picked up form the forms cache or the library.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
Ian
|
| 2366.37 | If your forms are in the wrong live locations | SIOG::T_REDMOND | Thoughts of an Idle Mind | Mon May 24 1993 11:58 | 31 |
| Also check the live disk location field in CM.
1. Select the form
2. Type:
<GET CM$SITELOG.LIVE_DISK_LOCATION[$CM_KEY]
If the two forms have different live disk locations then we have the
answer. Forms in a form set must be in the same library.
To solve the problem (if this is what it is).
1. Move the form that isn't in OA$LIB:SITEOAFORM.LIB back into the
development area (CM RFL). Remember to Process marked elements.
2. Select the form.
3. Change the live disk location field:
<WRITE CHANGE CM$SITELOG %KEY = $CM_KEY, LIVE_DISK_LOCATION =
"OA$SITE_LIB_ENGLISH:SITEOAFORM.FLB"
(or blank out the live disk location and then do a MLA, in which case
CM will invite you to enter a new live location)
4. Move the form into the live area.
5. Test (and hopefully succeed)
Tony
|
| 2366.38 | find_form approach | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri May 28 1993 07:56 | 31 |
| Hi! Ian,
I did enter "<find_form(form="emhead",out=....)" as you suggested, and I
got the following messages:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXAMINE(SYMBOLS="#*EMHEAD*")
Local Symbols:
--------------
#emhead_stat 1
#emhead OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.MGR]USER.FLB
#emhead2_stat 1
#emhead2 OA$DISK:[ALLIN!.SITE.LIB_ENGLISH]SITEOAFORM.FLB
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seemed like they were picked up from the different library? If this is the
reson cause my problem, please tell me the solution of it.
In addition, I tried "<get cm$sitelog.live_disk_location[$cm_key]" as
Tony suggested in .37, but both forms selected returned the identical library:
OA$SITE_LIB_LLV:SITEOAFORM.FLB,
therefore, I didn't go any further to fix the problem.
Thank you for all your time and efforts.
Wade
|
| 2366.39 | At last - We've found it!! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri May 28 1993 12:11 | 11 |
| OK, it's now simple. The Manager has a private copy of the form in
their USER form library, but doesn't have the other half of the form
set.
Go to FD, select the form in the user library and delete it. Now the
problem should go away, since both halves of the form will come from
the SITE library.
Repeat the steps in the previous note to be sure.
Graham
|
| 2366.40 | SYSTIDY/SYSUSER and Patch v3.0-1 conflicts | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Mon May 31 1993 08:44 | 46 |
| Hi! Graham and all the others:
Thank you for all your time and efforts contributed on my problem.
The problem now has been eliminated after I enter "FD", then select
"EMHEAD" and delete it.
I am in the progress to update the TeamRoute from v1.0 to v1.1,
as instructed in the installation menu, I need to install ALL-IN-1
v3.0-1 patch kit first, and I did finish the installation procedure,
but then after I did "relink", I got a bunch of linking object is
not found in certain libraries, or duplicate objects are found.
Thus, my relink was failed and I did not get a new OA$MAIN.EXE created.
I consulted to one of my colleagues who had done ALL-IN-1 installation
before. He told me that might be because my current ALL-IN-1 has USIS
kit in it (SYSUSER, SYSTIDY), and these kits created some new object
modules; renamed, or re-arranged some existing object modules in different
order that were resided or used to reside in certain defaulted relinking
libraries, then caused the duplicate or modules not found problem.
I listed the A1_ECO001030.B saveset listing as below (object only):
object modules: (Part 1)
FINDFILE.OBJ, OA$SM_FCVR.OBJ, OA$SM_FCVR_TABLE_RTN.OBJ, OA$SM_MESS.OBJ,
OAARC.OBJ, OACABA.OBJ, OACABF.OBJ, OACABH.OBJ, OACABR.OBJ, OACHECK.OBJ,
OACMD.OBJ, OACMF.OBJ, OACMMA.OBJ, OACOPY.OBJ, OAEMDF1.OBJ, OAEMDF2.OBJ,
OAEMDF3.OBJ, OAEMDF4.OBJ, OAEMDF5.OBJ, OAEMDF8.OBJ, OAFBT.OBJ, OAFCF.OBJ,
OAFORMATTER.OBJ, OAIO.OBJ, OAMTIBLD.OBJ, OAMTIDLV.OBJ, OAMTILOC.OBJ,
OAMTIREM.OBJ, OAUIC.OBJ,
object libraries: (part 2)
OAFC$SERVER.OLB, WPAPRINT.OLB, WPAPRINTBG.OLB
I have run the "Deinstallation" on ALL-IN-1 v3.0-1 patch kit; can someone help
me to locate which object module in part 1 should replace/insert to the object
library in part 2? Then I can do the patch v3.0-1 relink on those modules in
part 1 specifically by replacing them in the current existing library in part
2 instead of re-arrange, rename or even delete them. This way, I might be
able to eliminate the conflicts between SYSUSER/SYSTIDY and ALL-IN-1 patch
v3.0-1.
Best Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.41 | Ask the USIS developers? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue Jun 01 1993 09:32 | 9 |
| Wade,
There's a conference about the USIS kit somewhere, may be a pointer in
4.* here, perhaps they'll know about this problem.
Graham
PS Please don't post big object module listings like in your previous
reply, most of which I've now removed. Thanks.
|
| 2366.42 | Index of shared directories | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue Jun 15 1993 13:23 | 43 |
| Hi!
I have a question about the shared directories management.
First, I show logical on OA$SHARE_LOW and OA$SHARE_HIGH, I got "1"
and "10" respectively, then I do dir on OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE]*.dir, I
got the following output:
share1.dir;1 ----
share2.dir;1 |
.......... |---> I only have share1.dir to share10.dir available
.......... |
share10.dir;1 ----
But, in ALL-IN-1, I enter "mgt mma isd", I got the follows:
Shared Directories
(Selections: 0 ) (New messages: 0 )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Logical Directory Files Size
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 1 OA$SHARE1 OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SHARE1] 5 24
2 OA$SHARE10 OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE10] 99 774
3 OA$SHARE11 OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE11] 0 0
4 OA$SHARE12 OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE12] 0 0
....................
11 OA$SHARE19 OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE19] 0 0
13 OA$SHARE20 OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE20] 0 0
....................
22 OA$SHARE20 OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE29] 0 0
24 OA$SHARE30 OA$DISK:[OA$SHARE.SHARE30] 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The output means that I have more than share1 to share10 directories
available, please give a pointer on how to make this shared directories
consistent between physical disk directories and ALL-IN-1 "ISD"(index of
shared directories).
Thanks,
Wade
|
| 2366.43 | <FORM SM_SHARED_DIR_MASTER | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri Jun 18 1993 12:02 | 6 |
| A quick examination of the named data reveals that the shared areas are
referenced by the form SM_SHARED_DIR_MASTER. Call this form up and
delete the unwanted entries. Make sure the directories really don't
exist first!
Graham
|
| 2366.44 | ALL-IN-1 PostScript Printing issue | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue Jun 22 1993 05:35 | 35 |
| Hi!
I have done a test on the ALL-IN-1 v3.0 for PostScript data printing
function, and it ended up with failure, printout listed a bunch of
PostScript commands and control codes, I am not sure was this bacause
the set up of my printer in ALL-IN-1 was incorrect or there was some
other setup that I missed.
My printer is PrintServer20, and my set up in ALL-IN-1 are as follows:
=============================================================================
System Manager Account Tue 22-Jun-1993
Manage Site Printers
Site Printers Master
Printer Name: LPS70$POST
Description: LPS70 printer for PostScript
Format Printer Type: PS
Destination Printer Type: LPS20
Print queue: LPS70$POST
Printer level: LPS20-PS
Comments: LPS70 printer for PostScript
==========================================================================
I have done "dt sv" to save this mail in VMS file for your review, the
filename is in tpovc::[wadejeng]pstest.txt which has text data at front
and followed by a PostScript data as a attachment.
The first, I need your help to look into my setup of the printer, the
second, I like to know do I have to install DCPS (DECprint Supervior)
in order to print a ALL-IN-1 mail with mixed text and PostScript format?
Thank you for your help!
Wade
|
| 2366.45 | Some questions | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO2-G/L2 | Tue Jun 22 1993 12:57 | 10 |
| Re: .44
1. What do you mean by 'printout listed a bunch of PostScript commands and
control codes'? Was the whole PostScript file printed, or was the file
interpreted as PostScript but some PostScript errors were reported?
2. Can you print documents to the same printer destination?
Richard
|
| 2366.48 | OA$DAF_E.DAT reverage? | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri Dec 31 1993 09:13 | 21 |
| Hi! all,
We have a problem resulted from the OA$DAF_E.DAT corrupted, after the
corruption, we tried to re-convert the OA$DAF_E.DAT but failed to do
it.
Now, the system we have that have problem in performing OAMTIMAIL task,
the OAMTIMAIL actually execute "DO OA$LIB:REFILE" statements and we got
the following message in return:
%OA_I_CAB_CANT_FIND the current file cabinet document can not be found
MAIL MTI_FETCH_REMOTE
and the "DO OA$LIB:REFILE" seemed to fall into a in-finitive loop with
no more I/O increase after it hit certain I/O number.
Can someone address me a pointer of the OA$DAF_E.DAT recover procedure?
Cheers,
Wade
|
| 2366.49 | | GIDDAY::SETHI | Oh what a feeling ..... | Sat Jan 01 1994 03:50 | 12 |
| Hi Wade,
What type of corruption do you get ? Do an $ analyze/rms/check
OA$DAF_E.DAT, depending on the type of corruption your local CSC may
have a tool to fix the OA$DAF_E.DAT.
Note - the tool is *NOT* to be given to the customer as we charge for
recovery of corrupted files.
Regards,
Sunil
|
| 2366.50 | Analysis of OA$OAF_E.DAT corruption | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri Jan 07 1994 10:28 | 91 |
| Hi! Sunil,
The following attachment is the analysis data of OA$DAF_E.DAT for your
reference, I like to have the pointer to instruct me how to recover the
corrupted OA$DAF_E.DAT file.
Check RMS File Integrity 5-JAN-1994 09:18:36.97 Page 1
$1$DUA37:[TMP]OA$DAF_E.DAT;1
FILE HEADER
File Spec: $1$DUA37:[TMP]OA$DAF_E.DAT;1
File ID: (580,18,0)
Owner UIC: [11,100]
Protection: System: RWED, Owner: RWED, Group: RE, World: RWED
Creation Date: 22-OCT-1993 20:41:55.45
Revision Date: 5-JAN-1994 00:44:17.52, Number: 22074
Expiration Date: none specified
Backup Date: none posted
Contiguity Options: none
Performance Options: none
Reliability Options: none
Journaling Enabled: none
RMS FILE ATTRIBUTES
File Organization: indexed
Record Format: variable
Record Attributes: carriage-return
Maximum Record Size: 2000
Blocks Allocated: 258072, Default Extend Size: 100
Bucket Size: 4
File Monitoring: disabled
Global Buffer Count: 0
FIXED PROLOG
Number of Areas: 1, VBN of First Descriptor: 2
Prolog Version: 3
AREA DESCRIPTOR #0 (VBN 2, offset %X'0000')
Bucket Size: 4
Reclaimed Bucket VBN: 0
Current Extent Start: 257971, Blocks: 102, Used: 72, Next: 258043
Default Extend Quantity: 100
Total Allocation: 258072
KEY DESCRIPTOR #0 (VBN 1, offset %X'0000')
Index Area: 0, Level 1 Index Area: 0, Data Area: 0
Root Level: 4
Index Bucket Size: 4, Data Bucket Size: 4
Root VBN: 110935
Key Flags:
(0) KEY$V_DUPKEYS 0
(3) KEY$V_IDX_COMPR 0
(4) KEY$V_INITIDX 0
(6) KEY$V_KEY_COMPR 0
(7) KEY$V_REC_COMPR 1
Key Segments: 1
Check RMS File Integrity 5-JAN-1994 09:18:39.06 Page 2
$1$DUA37:[TMP]OA$DAF_E.DAT;1
Key Size: 65
Minimum Record Size: 65
Index Fill Quantity: 2048, Data Fill Quantity: 2048
Segment Positions: 0
Segment Sizes: 65
Data Type: string
Name: "DAF_KEY"
First Data Bucket VBN: 3
*** VBN 4965: Record at offset %X'0343' has a missing or illegal RRV.
*** VBN 257163: Next-bucket pointer out of range of file.
Unrecoverable error encountered in structure of file.
The analysis uncovered 3 errors.
ANALYZE/RMS/CHECK/OUT=1.RPT OA$DAF_E.DAT;1
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.53 | | GIDDAY::SETHI | Oh what a feeling ..... | Mon Jan 10 1994 22:48 | 41 |
| Hi Wade,
Re note .51 was lost due to diskquota problems.
I guess you have tried doing a convert/fdl ? If not can you try doing
the convert to see if you can get around the problem ?
I have two tools available that *MAY FIX* the corruption note I will
*NOT GUARANTEE* anything. If the SDAF is badly corrupted you may have
to restore from backup, the problem you have reported has/may not have
been caused by the upgrade. It is highly unlikely that the upgrade
corrupted the SDAF.
Firstly check with your local CSC to see if they have any tools
available to fix corrupted files. If the OA group does not have the
tool than check with the OpenVMS group. Basically the tools I have
available will patch the corrupted records, this means that the data
will be lost from the SDAF.
Digital charge for this service and we have to make it clear to the
customer that we will *TRY* to recover as much data as possible.
Digital do not give any guarantees that the data files will be restored
fully or partly. Data integrity is the responsibility of the customer
and *NOT* the responsibility of Digital. I have to make this clear so
that you or the customer is left in no doubt and *REAL EXPECTATIONS*
are set before you make any commitments.
I will expect you to firstly contact your local CSC and *IF THEY DON'T*
have the tools available, I will make them available. On the
understanding that these tools are Digitals property and that they
cannot be given to the customer. As soon as you have "fixed" the
problem you must do a delete/erase of the tools from the customers
system. Please contact me off-line and I will give you instructions on
how to use the tools.
Regards,
Sunil
PS - It's slightly hot here in Sydney. They certainly have big BBQ's
Downunder.
|
| 2366.54 | ALL-IN-1 logical definition issue | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri Jan 14 1994 09:47 | 28 |
| Hi!
I have some issues addressed from some other sites' ALL-IN-1
upograde as below (our region is doing ALL-IN-1 v3.0, SYSTIDY v2.0,
SYSUSER v2.0, and A1-patch 3.0-1 upgrade):
Q. Why after all the installation done, some ALL-IN-1 logicals point
to the wrong directories? and how to fix it?
e.g. OA$BUILD_SHARE logical pointed to OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SOURCE] but
not OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SOURCE_SHARE]
Q. Does TeamLinks v2.0 needs to incorporate with ALL-IN-1 v3.0a ?
we have ALL-IN-1 v3.0 and ALL-IN-1 patch v3.0-1 but we failed in
installing TeamLinks v2.0. This is a TeamLinks fresh installation
on our sites.
Q. One user has TeamRoute routing message problem, both II(Inbox), IP
(Pending) are empty, but system keep poping up a message:
TMR TeamRoute ( 2 new routing items )
I tried "mgt mm ruc" to reset user unread counter, but it did'nt help.
Cheers,
Wade
|
| 2366.55 | TeamLinks answer | IOSG::TALLETT | Gimmee an Alpha colour WinPad! | Fri Jan 14 1994 10:55 | 18 |
| > Q. Does TeamLinks v2.0 needs to incorporate with ALL-IN-1 v3.0a ?
> we have ALL-IN-1 v3.0 and ALL-IN-1 patch v3.0-1
TeamLinks V2.0 requires ALL-IN-1 V3.0A + TeamLinks Connection
Package V2.0 (TLC V2.0 - on the same tape as V3.0A).
> but we failed in
> installing TeamLinks v2.0. This is a TeamLinks fresh installation
> on our sites.
Not having V3.0A CAN NOT prevent TeamLinks installing. This is
a different problem, try asking in WINDOWS_OFFICE.
If you meant to say TeamLinks Connection Package V2.0, then yes,
you need V3.0A for TLC V2.0, and it won't install without it.
Regards,
Paul
|
| 2366.56 | TeamRoute answer | IOSG::MAURICE | I left my heart in Alcatraz | Fri Jan 14 1994 13:00 | 16 |
| Q. One user has TeamRoute routing message problem, both II(Inbox), IP
(Pending) are empty, but system keep poping up a message:
TMR TeamRoute ( 2 new routing items )
A. If the user does TMR II are there any items? If not then check that
they have not been refiled to another folder. You can reset the
count by:
<cab decrement "TMR"
(twice if the count is 2)
Cheers
Stuart
|
| 2366.57 | Logicals definition error | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Mon Jan 17 1994 02:44 | 27 |
| purg 2.txt
Hi! Paul and Stuart:
Thank you first for both of your help in my TLC and TeamRoute problem,
and I would be grateful if first question in 2366.54 can be resolved
as well (the problem is given as below again).
Q. Why after all the installation done, some ALL-IN-1 logicals point
to the wrong directories? and how to fix it?
e.g. OA$BUILD_SHARE logical pointed to OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SOURCE] but
not OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SOURCE_SHARE], which resulted in
%DCL-E-OPENIN, error opening DUA1:[ALLIN1.SOURCES]A1_ECO001030_RELINK.COM;
as input
-RMS-E-DNF, directory not found
-SYSTEM-W-NOSUCHFILE, no such file
at executiuon of a1_eco001030_relink.com at post-installation of
A1 patch v3.0-1.
I tried running POSTINSTALL.COM and DELETE_OBSOLETE_FILES.COM and
REPAIR_DIAMOND.COM, but they didn't help.
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.58 | Beats me... More details possible? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Mon Jan 17 1994 09:01 | 8 |
| I've never heard of this before. Have you made sure that A1V30START has
successfully run? Is there anything in the Site startup file? Is there
anything "unusual" about the ALL-IN-1 directory tree? Have things been
split across more than one disc?
This is a hard question, but how were the logicals defined before?
Graham
|
| 2366.59 | A1 V3.0A kits/Instal. Guide | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Mon Jan 17 1994 10:39 | 17 |
| Hi! Paul,
Thank you for your reply for my ALL-IN-1 V3.0A and TLC V2.0
co-instal question, now, I understand to install TLC V2.0, the pre-
requisite is to install ALL-IN-1 V3.0A. The following needs has come
into my mind, please help me in providing the pointer of them:
1. Where to get ALL-IN-1 V3.0A Kits?
2. Where to get installation guide, release note of ALL-IN-1 V3.0A?
I could not find them in IOSG::USER1:[LIBRARY.A1V30]
3. Where to get Installation Guide, Release Note of TLC V2.0?
I only have TLC020.* kit without documents.
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.60 | Documentation is part of the kit | IOSG::EDMONDSON | Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me videre? | Mon Jan 17 1994 13:58 | 13 |
| I can't answer your question about the location of the V3.0A kit, but
once you find the kit, the installation and release notes information
form part of the kit (you access them by using OPTIONS N of VMSINSTAL).
Similarly, if you have the TLC020 kit, you should have the
documentation, as it's provided in the form of printable files in
saveset D.
Alternatively, you can copy the TLC documentation from:
IOSG::USER1:[LIBRARY.TLC]TLC_INST_MG.PS or .TXT
Ro
|
| 2366.61 | Refer to 7.6 | IOSG::BURTON | ALL-IN-1 Builder | Mon Jan 17 1994 16:47 | 6 |
| See note 7.* for kit location (Including V3.0A). This also includes a
cover letter which provides all the information you need to install
both V3.0A and TLC V2.0, including accessing the release notes &
TLC installation guide.
Martin.
|
| 2366.62 | Error opening SCRIPT file | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue Jan 25 1994 07:11 | 61 |
| Hi!
I have finished ALL-IN-1 upgrading from v2.4 to V3.0 on one of our region
site, I had five items indicated with status code "M" in CART report as
below prior to upgrading:
DEFAULT FRM ENGLISH M
MAILMEMO1 BLP ENGLISH M
MAILMEMO2 BLP ENGLISH M
SCHDMA FRM ENGLISH M
SCHDMAUISCAN FRM ENGLISH M
I did the minimum conflicts resolution to remove these elements from live
area and put them into development area before upgrading.
After I finished upgrading, I had some message displayed at ALL-IN-1 startup
as I had previously in note #2766.0:
Obsolete version of OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SITE.LIB_ENGLISH]SITEMANAGER.FLC; - Continue
Obsolete version of TMRA1$DISK:[TMRA1SERVICE.LIB_ENGLISH]TMRFLB.FLC; - Continue
opening SCRIPT file "OAX$LIB_TIDY:SYSTIDY$OAINI"
I tried to compile SITEMANAGER as I did before buy entering "CM" or "SM CSZ",
I saw the following message shown at the bottom of the screen:
Customization Management search orders set
and then enter "PCF" for precompiling "oa$disk:[allin1.site.lib_english]
sitemanager", I got the following message:
Error opening SCRIPT file "CM_PCF"
then press CTRL/N to display named data accordingly, then I got:
Error opening MERGE file "VIEW" ...Press RETURN
I tried to execute certain other fucntions, it seemed to me that since I enter
"CM" or "SM CSZ", the customization search order was set, then, I no longer to
find any script or press "CTRL/N" to view any named data, I even tried to
execute CART resolution script file as CART menu proposed as follows:
<do oa$disk:[allin1.site]cm_cart_script_v30$english
and failed with the follows:
Form *CMMANAGEAREAS is not in the library
Q. Did I have to do something before ALL-IN-1 startup? since I removed those
five elements as mandatory conflict resolution prior to upgrade.
Q. What might go wrong with my customization search order?
Q. Why I could not get oa$disk:[allin1.site]cm_cart_script_v30$english
executed as instructed in CART menu?
Q. My EMC form still looked as V2.4, I could not find DRAWER field as V3.0
supposed to see.
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.63 | develop area open? | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | SWBFS | Tue Jan 25 1994 08:38 | 12 |
|
It sounds like you ask CM to open your development areas when you first
entered CM, correct?
Go into you OAUSER and delete *.A1$ESO;*, *.A1$LSO;*
When you go into CM again and it asks about developement areas say N.
Note that you shouldn't be running the CART script without first
playing around with it quite a bit. You'll need to edit it so that it
only processes the statuses for particular elements.
Mike
|
| 2366.64 | /NOCUSTOM and no DEVELOP forms or areas! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue Jan 25 1994 17:46 | 16 |
| Re last question
If you've customised EMC, then you'll still see the old version, since
it's not a mandatory change. It will be a change that you should
address "soon" after the upgrade though.
Expanding on Mike's previous reply, because the Manager is a CM user,
he gets the DEVELOP forma library etc., opened when he goes into CM,
and hence all the things that you removed from live get found again.
You need to tidy up a bit whilst the MANAGER doesn't see any
customisations, so as well as taking Mike's advice to stop DEVELOP
being opended, it wouild be a good idea to start ALL-IN-1 with
/NOCUSTOM as well.
Graham
|
| 2366.65 | delete *.a1$eso *.a1$lso files | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri Jan 28 1994 05:55 | 27 |
| Hi! Mike and Graham,
I have found some *.a1$eso and *.a1$lso files as below:
Directory OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.LIB_SHARE]
CM_APPLICATION.A1$ESO;1 CM_APPLICATION.A1$LSO;1
CM_MANAGER.A1$ESO;1 CM_MANAGER.A1$LSO;1 CM_PROGRAMMER.A1$ESO;1
CM_PROGRAMMER.A1$LSO;1
Total of 6 files.
Directory OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.MGR]
CM_MANAGER.A1$ESO;1 CM_MANAGER.A1$LSO;1 DEFAULT.A1$ESO;1
DEFAULT.A1$LSO;1
Total of 4 files.
Mike, in .63 reply, you said go into OAUSER, I am assuming to login
into ALL-IN-1 MANAGER account, but you want me to delete *.a1$eso
and *.a1$lso files, is that only apply to those files in OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.
MGR], or I have to delete files in OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.LIB_SHARE] as well?
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.66 | NO, NO, NO :-) | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri Jan 28 1994 09:11 | 11 |
| NO, DO NOT delete the ones in OA$LIB! They are the template ones used
to set up everybody's search orders.
Just go into the MNAGAER account, spawn into the subprocess, and you'll
be in the right place. (Usually [.MGR]) and just delete the Manager's
*.%SO files.
Then exit ALL-IN-1 and reent;er, and when you go into CM, say "N" to
teh question about including DEVELOP in the search order.
Graham
|
| 2366.67 | problem after deleting *.a1%so files | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Wed Feb 02 1994 01:37 | 15 |
| Hi! Graham and Mike,
I did delete *.a1%so files in [ALLIN1.MGR] (e.g. CM_MANAGER.A1%SO,
DEFAULT.A1%SO), and then reenter ALL-IN-1. But when I enter "CM"
I got "Cannot find form "CM1"" message in response, and I could'nt
even go into CM again to answer "N" at the prompt for development
areas, have you had experience in this problem? I also enter
"ALLIN1/NOCUST", and I could get a new EMC form with DRAWER new
feature shown on the screen which is the right display on V3.0,
if I don't enter "ALLIN1/NOCUSTOM" and I still got V2.4 display
without DRAWER shown.
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.68 | | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Wed Feb 02 1994 09:31 | 11 |
| 1) Check what form libraries the MANAGER has in his PROFIL record.
2) Are you specifying any other qualifiers to the ALLIN1 (sic)
commmand, like /MENU or similar?
3) Until this is a bit better sorted, always use ALLI/NOCUSTOM.
The initial CM form is called CM$MAIN in V3.0, so something is
obviously still amiss. Probably you are seeing the wrong DEFAULT form.
Graham
|
| 2366.69 | EMC in DEVELOP.FLB not in SITEOAFORM | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue Feb 08 1994 06:22 | 25 |
| Hi! Graham,
I have completed subsequent installation of systidy and sysuser after I
did ALL-IN-1 v3.0 installation, for my previous problems in .62, I
suspected that my ALL-IN-1 v2.4 was incorporated with SYSUSER/SYSTIDY
V1.0 which resulted in certain "CM" problems, therefore, I did the upgrade
for SYSTIDY and SYSUSER form v1.0 to v2.0 respectively, and now, the system
seems to work properly, I can do "SM", "CM", .... , and "EM" (using "EMC"
form in OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SITE.LIB_ENGLISH]SITEOAFORM) also come up a new menu
with "DRAWER" new feature in it.
There is still a minor problem in my ALL-IN-1 v3.0, right after I do "CM",
which will in turn, set search order, then I come back to do "EM", then
the "EMC" form was changed to OA$DISK:[ALLIN1.SITE.DEV_ENGLISH]DEVELOP.FLB,
I believe it's because search order has been reset. I do "CM" "SCE" "SSO",
my current order is "CM_MANAGER" the first, "DEFAULT" the second, which
I believe should be the right order.
Q. Should I reset some other search order (e.g. form library order)?
Q. Should I just go ahead replace EMC in DEVELOP.FLB with EMC in SITEOAFORM?
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.70 | Where is "ALL","XR" named data/SCRIPT | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue Feb 08 1994 10:03 | 13 |
| Hi,
Can someone provide me the pointer where to locate "ALL" and "XR"
SCRIT fiels or named data, I use "CTRL/N" to look at "EM$INDEX$MENU"
form, but have the difficulty to find them. It seems to me that they
XOP "~~MULTIPLE_FILING_LOOP~~", "~~MULTIPLE_LOOP~~", and
"~~MULTIPLE_READ~~" procedures, but I have the problem to find these
procedures.
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.71 | | IOSG::MAURICE | I left my heart in Alcatraz | Tue Feb 08 1994 10:53 | 23 |
| Hi,
You will find the Named Data for ALL on form MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX,
under ;;OA$_MO_SELECT_ALL;;
There are also related forms such as SM$MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX,
SA$MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX & CM$MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX.FLX for use in
System Mgt, System Administrtation, and Customisation Mgt respectively.
(I think there's another one as well). But your note impiles it's the
index of message you are interested in, and so MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX
is the one you want.
You will find the Named Data for "XR" in form EM$INDEX$OPTIONS (again
assuming it's the index of messages you are interested in).
A little trick to get these "invisible" forms up to see the Named data
is to type:
<form MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX/pre=prompt
and then use Control N to see the Named data.
HTH
Stuart
|
| 2366.72 | You choose the EMC form! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Wed Feb 09 1994 18:15 | 10 |
| RE .69
If you are any sort of Application Programmer in the profile, you'll
get DEVELOP opened, and so you'll see EMC from there. That's the way
it's supposed to work...
I can't tell you whether the version of EMC in DEVELOP or OAFORM or
SITEOAFORM is the right one, you have to decide that!
Graham
|
| 2366.73 | how to modify oa$_tmr_mo_read to oa$_tmr_mo_x_read | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Fri Feb 18 1994 03:41 | 45 |
| Hi! Stuart,
Thank you first for your reply on my 608.0 question, but I cannot find
"ALL" AND "XR" either in TMR$ARG$INDEX_DOCS_OPTIONS or TMR$MORE$SCROLL$
KEYS$INDEX$DOCS named data, I only find "READ" function
as below from TMR$ARG$INDEX_DOCS_OPTIONS.
;;OA$_TMR_MO_READ;;
get #tmrdoc = oa$scroll_key\
xop "~~verify_tmrdoc~~"\
.fx ifnotstatus\\oa$msg_purge\\
get oa$display = oa$_tmr_cl_not_tmr_document\
.fx ifstatus\\xop "~~set_new_tmrdoc~~"\\do tmr$cl_read\\close_prior\\
|
--------------------------------^
oa$scl_update cab$.%address[$tmrdoc]\\ |
oa$scl_refresh |
|
Could you give me a pointer on how to modify this script | to provide a
"XR" function for "read all selected" or instruct me which | form to find
-------------------------------------------------^
|
^
"~~set_new_tmrdoc~~" procedure.
I have added a function -- "ALL" for "select all" as below, I extract exactly
the same named data from MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX, and I am working on "XR"
function at current stage.
;;OA$_MO_SELECT_ALL;;
GET OA$FUNCTION="FOR " OA$SCROLL_BINDING " DO
GET OA$FUNCTION = 'OA$SCL_SELECT OA$SEL_ADDRESS'"\OA$SCL_REFRESH
Stuart, is it possible the "ALL" and "XR" function in TMR$ARG$INDEX_DOCS_OPTIONS
and TMR$MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX$DOCS of my TMRFLB.FLB has been removed somehow
by our former TMR developer, if you think it might be the case why I cannot
find "ALL" and "XR" in these two forms' named data, please give me a pointer
where to copy a complete form of TMR$ARG$INDEX_DOCS_OPTIONS and
TMR$MORE$SCROLL$KEYS$INDEX$DOCS repectively.
Thanks,
Wade
|
| 2366.75 | | IOSG::MAURICE | I left my heart in Alcatraz | Fri Feb 18 1994 15:54 | 12 |
| Re .73
Hi Wade,
The changes to add the ALL and XR options were part of the enhancements
made in V1.1 of TeamRoute for ALL-IN-1. These options were not present
in V1.0. So I suspect that you are either looking at the V1.0 forms, or
you are looking on a V1.1 system at customised versions of these forms.
Cheers
Stuart
|
| 2366.76 | Error in creating ALLIN1 user on V3.0 | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Wed Apr 13 1994 04:46 | 36 |
| Hi!
I have a problem in creating a ALLIN1 user on my system (ALLIN1 v.30),
The log file was extracted as follows, please help me in resolving this
problem. Thanks!
========================= OA$CREATE_WADE_JENG.LOG =======================
.................
File Cabinet created with status = 1
Profile record for the ALL-IN-1 subdirectory is (before)
MIS$DISK:[WADEJENG.ALL
Profile record for the ALL-IN-1 subdirectory is (after)
MIS$DISK:[WADEJENG.ALLI
SMTEMPLATE record for the UIC Group is (before) 30
SMTEMPLATE record for the UIC Group is (after) 30
Creating the user's Subscriber Entry in the Mail Directory ...
Profile flag for adding subscriber to Mail Directory = Y
cli$dds_status = 0
Testing the DDS server status ...
Status returned from DDS suspended check = 2
DDS is stopped - unable to add subscriber; quitting...
A fatal error has occurred in SM_CR_USER_DETAILS.SCP
...............
================================= End of log ============================
|
| 2366.77 | DDS stopped? | IOSG::TYLDESLEY | | Wed Apr 13 1994 10:34 | 16 |
| Well the simplest way to avoid this is not to add the user to the Mail
Directory when you create them! ;-) Edit the template you are using
to turn the Mail directory field to 'N', and re-try.
Other than that, the log tells you what is wrong - DDS is suspended.
There are some states of DDS that are difficult to check, and suspended
is one of them, if I recall, because the inquiry simply hangs...
So, Create User does a very mickey-mouse test for DDS suspension, which
is what is failing your Create User job. Check out DDS on your systems.
If you have a look at oa$lib:sm_submit_check_dds.com you will see that
the actual error status returned (2) means that "DDS is stopped".
Cheers
DaveT
|
| 2366.78 | A1_FC_REPORT_MAIL.SCP cannot be parsed | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue Apr 26 1994 13:56 | 25 |
| Hi!
I am doing the SYSTIDY upgrade from v1.0 to v2.0 on ALL-IN-1 v3.0, and
resulting in a failure with following messages:
...............
...............
%SYSTIDY-I-MARKELE, Marking A1CHECKMAIL CLD
%SYSTIDY-I-MARKELE, Marking A1CHECKMAIL FGN
%SYSTIDY-I-MARKELE, Marking A1_FC_REPORT_MAIL DO
%VMSINSTAL-E-BADSPEC, File spec A1_FC_REPORT_MAIL.SCP cannot be parsed
%VMSINSTAL-E-INSFAIL, The installation of SYSTIDY V2.0 has failed.
...............
...............
I assuming that the installation procedure try to execute A1_FC_REPORT_MAIL.SCP
which can't be found.
Can someone help me on this issue?
Regards
Wade
|
| 2366.79 | print one page only for a multiple pages mail | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue May 03 1994 08:41 | 14 |
| Hi!
I have a problem in printing a multiple pages mail to a printer or a file,
when this mail go to a printer or a file, it extracts one page only but
not all the pages, this page is locate in the middle of this mail. I have
tried "BMA" - for Balance Mail Area, and "RSD" - for Reorganize shared
directories, but still cannot eliminate this problem. I am thinking to
delete this specific user account and re-create it again, but I am lake
of the experience in how to recover mail messages for a deleted user
after recreation.
Can someone provide me with some solutions of my problem?
Wade
|
| 2366.80 | obvious idea | FRAMBO::HOFMANN | Stefan Hofmann, IST FiWi @FRS | Tue May 03 1994 08:50 | 6 |
| did you check the entries in fields "FROM_PAGE" and "TO_PAGE" on
printer setting form WPPARG1? Maybe somebody changed it to e.g. page
6 to 7 and stored it as standard printer settings which are now used
for your long mail.
Stefan
|
| 2366.81 | Need more instruction on printer setting | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Tue May 03 1994 13:10 | 26 |
| Hi!
I did try "WPPARG1" and the form displayed as follows:
Print Settings Menu
CO Change control settings
PG Change pagination settings
PL Change page layout
FS Change footnote settings
RB Remove blank lines at top of page (Y/N): N
SS Save print settings # 0
RS Restore print settings # 0
P Print with current settings
I assumed that your idea in checking "FROM_PAGE" and "TO_PAGE" on printer
setting was the option "PG", but I found all users at TPO have no data fill
in this form which meaned that no "FROM_PAGE" and "TO_PAGE" has been set,
and only one specific user have my reported problem -- print one page only
for a multiple pages mail.
Can you please instruct me more on the possible solution? Thanks.
Wade
|
| 2366.82 | Not the DIGITAL WPPARG1 form | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO2-G/L2 | Tue May 03 1994 14:06 | 5 |
| Your WPPARG1 is not the standard DIGITAL V2.4 or V3.0 WPPARG1 form, so it is
probably a customized version.
Richard
|
| 2366.83 | Print setting mess up constantly | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Thu May 05 1994 05:36 | 16 |
| Hi! Strefan and Richard,
Thank you for your help first, I finally can get around with my problem
by reset "First page printed:" and "Last page printed:" number, and it
works, but only temporarily.
What happen now is after I reset, I use "SS" to save print settings to
area 0, after that specific user print a couple of files, then print
settings will be messed up again, so user has to use "RS" to restore
print settings from area 0, I don't know what cause this problem? Is it
possible because of files contain control codes which mess up print
setting?
Please help me in this problem again. Thanks!
Wade
|
| 2366.84 | The same document? | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO2-G/L2 | Thu May 05 1994 12:30 | 23 |
|
> What happen now is after I reset, I use "SS" to save print settings to
> area 0, after that specific user print a couple of files, then print
> settings will be messed up again, so user has to use "RS" to restore
> print settings from area 0, I don't know what cause this problem? Is it
> possible because of files contain control codes which mess up print
> setting?
Are you saying that when the user has printed the SAME document a couple of
time the WPS-PLUS Print Settings are changed.
If the user is printing DIFFERENT documents then what you are seeing could be
expected. Each WPS-PLUS documents has its own WPS-PLUS Print Settings which
are stored in the header of the .WPL file. When you print a WPS-PLUS document
its own Print Settings are used by default unless you decide to change them.
Therefore every WPS-PLUS document may have different settings. If you decide
to change the WPS-PLUS Print Settings during a print operation then you are
changing the settings for that document only, and no other existing documents
will be changed.
Richard
|
| 2366.85 | File Cabinet cannot be accessed | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Wed May 11 1994 15:21 | 18 |
| Hi!
One of my region site has a problem in using "EM" after they upgrade
their ALL-IN-1 to v3.0a and incorporated with TLC v2.0, their mail
folder now appearing all blank, and display the following message while
enter "SEL" to select a folder.
File Cabinet cannot be accessed
There is no such drawer
and I check the mail area OA$SHARA and OA$SHARE and they all seems to
be ok, the OA$SHARA and OA$SHARE logicals are all well-defined.
Can someone help me with this problem?
Regards,
Wade
|
| 2366.86 | I know nothing about it, but... | IOSG::MARSHALL | A glitch in reality | Wed May 11 1994 18:14 | 3 |
| Sounds like the partition needs re-seeding?
Scott
|
| 2366.87 | How to re-seed partition? | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Thu May 12 1994 09:20 | 5 |
| Hi! Scott,
Can you please instruct me how to re-seed my partition. Thanks!
Wade
|
| 2366.88 | To seed a partition... | IOSG::MARSHALL | A glitch in reality | Thu May 12 1994 13:28 | 6 |
| See OA$LIB:OAFC$PART_SEED.SCP.
In particular, read the comments in the script about setting #OAFC_SEED_USER
just to do one user.
Scott
|
| 2366.89 | How to cut display of dist. list? | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Wed Jul 06 1994 10:13 | 21 |
| Hi!
I have a user request to cut the display of distribution list, can someone
address me how to start to work on this issue (e.g, modify script)?
=========================== A1 mail ======================================
.............
.............
Is it possible to do something at the system level to cut the display of
distribution list to 5 names or less, so that we would not waste time in
reading pages of distribution list before we get to the mail content?
This can definitely improve our work efficiency.
Please advise.
.............
.............
=========================== A1 mail ======================================
|
| 2366.90 | V3.1 | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO2-G/L2 | Wed Jul 06 1994 15:18 | 10 |
| Re: .89
Why is this an ALL-IN-1 V2.4 to V3.0 upgrade problem, because neither
version supports distribution list suppression?
ALL-IN-1 V3.1 does support distribution list suppression for Read and Print
operations, so if you upgrade to V3.1 you will get this feature.
Richard
|
| 2366.91 | Did you just wipe something out? | SHRMSG::HOWARD | Yes it is | Wed Jul 06 1994 22:25 | 10 |
| There are many notes on how to modify the boilerplates to do this. You
should look through a directory. Of course, if they are VMS Mail
messages, you can't do it, but for ALL-IN-1 messages you can. Is it
possible that you didn't run the CART (?) to find your customizations
from V2.4? You should be able to pull your old MAILMEMOn.BLP files
from V2.4 and use those. You do have to customize the SWC forms a bit,
I guess, but the old values should still be in the users' .PST files
for the time being.
Ben
|
| 2366.92 | | GIDDAY::JOYCE | Digital CSC Sydney | Thu Jul 07 1994 04:07 | 14 |
|
Re .-1
>You should be able to pull your old MAILMEMOn.BLP files
> from V2.4 and use those.
No, you shouldn't. They don't include the "Sent By:" field which get's
displayed when the message has been sent by someone using SMU.
Personally, I'd re-customise the V3.0 ones (or install V3.1).
Andy
|
| 2366.93 | dist. list suppression has nothing to do with upgrade | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Mon Jul 11 1994 11:12 | 16 |
| Hi! Andy, Ben and Richard,
The first, I like to thank to you all for your prompt reply, the second, I
like to say sorry I should'nt put my note .89 under A1 v2.4 to v3.0 upgrade
becuased it confused all of you and it actually has nothing to do with
ALLIN1 upgrade.
I am supposed to use another topic, but my question really is how can I
implement a distribution list suppression for read and print operation?
Richard, you mentioned that there are some notes do talk about this issue,
can you give me one or two note number which I can have a look first and
figure out how to change the boilerplates to suppress distribution list?
Thank you again!
Wade
|
| 2366.94 | Here's a start | SHRMSG::HOWARD | Yes it is | Mon Jul 11 1994 21:11 | 4 |
| You might start with note 1403. I don't have a listing of the V2.4
conference handy, but there are probably quite a few in there.
Ben
|
| 2366.95 | See note 2.1 ? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue Jul 12 1994 10:10 | 7 |
| <<< I don't have a listing of the V2.4 conference handy, but there are
<<< probably quite a few in there
See note 2.1 in this conference for a directory listing of the previous
(ALL-IN-1_V24) version of this conference.
Graham
|
| 2366.96 | Mail subject do not carry over at forwarding | TPOVC::WADEJENG | | Mon Jul 18 1994 09:56 | 44 |
| Hi!
I failed to add a new topic to ask the problem I have encountered and
got a error message as below:
Conference is set to REPLIES only. No policy privilege to add new topics.
Therefore, I still put my issue under V2.4 to V3.0 upgrade.
My issue is that on V2.4, when a user forwarding a READ mail, the subject
usually carry over the original mail subject unless user want to over-
write it. But on my v3.0, the subject is always blank. The new named data
of EMFWHD is partially extracted for your review as follows, I tried "<get
cab$.subject[oa$curdoc]", they all turned out to be good, in other words,
they are all corresponding to the current mail subject. Please help me to
figure out the reason why it always comes up blank.
========================= start of attachment ==============================
..............
..............
;;SUBJECT;;
/PRE='GET #CASE = #KMAIL_ANS = ""'
/GET=CAB$.SUBJECT[OA$CURDOC]
/HARD=OA$_GBL_SUBJECT
/POST='GET SUBJECT = SUBJECT::Z\GET #KMAIL_SAVE_SUBJ=SUBJECT\XOP
"~~GET_SEC~~"'
..............
..............
;;~~GET_SEC~~;;
FOR KMAIL_CLASSES WITH .VALUE EQS KMAIL_CLASS DO GET #KMAIL_C_CLASS=.CLASS\
GET OA$MESSAGE_FIELD='SUBJECT ' SUBJECT:71 #KMAIL_C_CLASS\
.IF #KMAIL_C_CLASS GES "3" THEN MAIL NON_FORWARDABLE ELSE MAIL FORWARDABL
--------------
=========================== End of attachment =============================
Can someone give me your help in resolving this issue?
Wade
|
| 2366.97 | Upgrade to V3.1 ? (and new conf :-) ) | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Mon Jul 18 1994 12:52 | 10 |
| See conference title, there is a new version of the conference, in
which you *can* write new notes. Less and less people will be reading
this old version of the conference, so I suggest you move to the new
one ASAP.
In V3.1, the title is automatically copied from the underlying message,
with 'FWD:' put on the front. In V3.0, I don't think that the mail code
does the copy of the subject, but the WP code does.
Graham
|