T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2332.2 | I think we can work this one here | AIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Tue Mar 02 1993 13:29 | 14 |
| Hi Monica,
I should have read this closer the first time. It's the second
part to the problem I'm concerned about. If that can be
reproduced upon demand on an uncustomized system, submit an SPR.
If this can only be produced on the customer system, I'd start by
looking for problems with customizations and mail corruption I've
not seen any problems with mail messages associated with TM
actually having the wrong body files.
If the customer is looking for a solution to the documented
restriction, escalate.
Dave Zaniewski
|
2332.3 | Thanks, kindly, Dave | KAOFS::M_FETT | alias Mrs.Barney | Tue Mar 02 1993 14:11 | 12 |
|
Thanks for the response. I suspect that this problem might
be going hand in hand with a corruption problem, but I will look
into it a little deeper. They are also getting the "Invalid or
Missing Arguments to Function" error when they edit the event
date (which, in yet another stars article, is the result of problems
repainting the index screen - however, it states while a problem
in 2.4, it is supposedly resolved in 3.0 - customer HAS 3.0 !)
I will play with this on our system and get back to you.
Monica
|
2332.4 | Verify where the forms come from | AIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Tue Mar 02 1993 17:29 | 5 |
| Make sure they haven't customized a v2.4 version of one of the
time mamagement index forms. Turn trace on and determine which
form library the form comes out of.
Dave Zaniewski
|