[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

2273.0. "ALL-IN-1 V3.0 Upgrade Service" by CHGV04::JANES (DTN 474-5373 Packaged Services Development) Tue Feb 16 1993 19:51

I am the Team Leader for the Information Technology Consulting 
(ITC) Service Development group out of Chicago. One of the projects
our group is currently working on is to create a set of service
offerings around the Teamlinks set of products and applications.

As part of a set of Teamlinks service offerings, we would also like 
to offer an ALL-IN-1 V3.0 Upgrade service. The service would include 
installation of the V3.0 software and migration (?) of customized 
ALL-IN-1 applications. What I would like to do is to offer an 
V3.0 upgrade service that is fixed priced and has a fairly predictable 
delivery length (i.e. a "packaged" service). Not having worked with 
ALL-IN-1 in a long time, (and never having had the pleasure of migrating 
from one ALL-IN-1 version to another) I am looking for some help in 
approaching this type of service. So I have a couple questions around an 
ALL-IN-1 V3.0 upgrade service.

1) Do you think it is possible to create a V3.0 upgrade service that is
   fixed priced and has a fixed delivery length? 

or put another way...

   Is there a way we can "bound" an upgrade service so that it can be
   delivered the same way at most any customer site, regardless of the 
   number of customizations?

   I realize that there are many variables here, but is there some common
   denominator that all ALL-IN-1 sites have so that we have a base to start
   from and possibly sell additional consulting services to address ALL-IN-1 
   needs that a "packaged" service cannot address?

If the answer to the first question is Yes or maybe (or a non-negative 
answer), then...

2) What would the components (deliverables) be for an ALL-IN-1 V3.0 Upgrade
   service? 

I would appreciate any help or ideas that anyone can offer. 

Thanks,
Lester Janes
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2273.1Yes, work done in Britain on preparing this...IOSG::PYEGraham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's ApprenticeWed Feb 17 1993 09:0615
    We investigated this in Britain. In fact we spent a week putting some
    material together. Our conclusion was that we would offer a number of
    packages, starting with a couple of fixed price services, one to run
    the CART and analyse the report, and another to do a general
    investigation into the health and customisation state of the system.
    Based on these two surveys, we designed a number of other services,
    mostly on a time and materials basis to actually do the upgrade,
    including customisation migration and application programmer training.
    
    Since money was spent on doing this work, I can't really give you the
    full story. You might like to contact Julian Kempster @ UCG, who owned
    the project and see what he felt about letting you have access to the
    material.
    
    Graham
2273.2two more questions...CHGV04::JANESDTN 474-5373 Packaged Services DevelopmentWed Feb 17 1993 16:1530
    Graham,
    
    >  Since money was spent on doing this work, I can't really give you the
    >  full story. 
    
    I appreciate money spent and ensuring that an effort gets its due
    return on investment. I hope the next couple of questions are generic
    enough in nature that you can give a little more info without
    compromising work already done.
    
    1) What is the price and time effort for the CART and analysis services
    that have been done in Britain? Since the US geography is fairly large
    the chance that travel will be incurred in delivering these services
    is very likely. As a result, my best guess for what we would have to
    charge in the US for this service would be a minimum of $6,000-$7,000
    for a weeks' effort. Is this in line with what you were charging?
    
    2) You said that the CART service would then lead to T&M services for 
    doing the upgrade and customization migration. Is there any way
    possbible to offer a "fixed-price" upgrade and customization that
    meets the needs of all customers, and with T&M work being sold to
    address upgrade and cusomization work beyond the basic "fixed-price"
    service?
    
    The reason I am asking for a "fixed-price" upgrade and customization
    is because a request has been made to me to create a service offering 
    that is easy for Sales to quote and sell

    Thanks for your help,
    Lester
2273.3I can't see how this *can* be fixed price!IOSG::PYEGraham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's ApprenticeThu Feb 18 1993 08:5228
    This is going to sound unhelpful...
    
    I'm *just* an Engineer, and I don't get directly sold to customers (at
    least not very often :-) ) so I don't understand pricing. I expect that
    the UK prices wouldn't really tell you anything relative to the US
    market anyway. I think the initial report and doing the CART run were
    both one day services.
    
    I would think that customer systems are so different that you couldn't
    possibly fix a fixed price for migrating customisations, unless you
    made it so high that you wouldn't ever catch a cold, in which case
    you'd scare off half the business!
    
    Our theory was that anyone delivering these services was used to doing
    variable time span consultancy, and could use the initial report, which
    might be done by a more junior person following a check list, to
    accurately specify the final price.
    
    We know of systems that have from zero to hundreds, possibly thousands
    of files customised, and systems that are from vanilla to having dozens
    of layered products installed. I can't see how you can possibly make a
    single price for handling that sort of thing.
    
    You should contact Julian, who I fingered in .1 for more info, maybe
    he'll agree to some of our material, e.g. the service descriptions,
    being posted. I don't have the rights to it.
    
    Graham
2273.4depends on various parametersBERN02::MUELLERSStefan A. M�ller DTN 761-4864Thu Feb 18 1993 14:2017
Hi,

>    ...offer a "fixed-price" upgrade and customization that
>    meets the needs of all customers, ...

The time needed to do the variuos things depends on different parameters 
(cpu, disks, number of customizations etc). This makes it difficult to offer a 
fixed price that meets all customers needs. Doing so some customers would pay 
too much some too less. Clever customers only pay for this service if it's 
cheaper than an individual offer.

After evaluating this possibility we offer a couple of days to the customer. If
not all the time will be needed for the upgrade, the customer may get other 
services for the remaining time. For SUIS customers it's essential to show them
what will be covered by the contract and for what they have to pay.

Stefan
2273.5I know a little about the CART ;-)SIOG::T_REDMONDThoughts of an Idle MindSun Feb 21 1993 15:3163
    I have recently spent some time with a customer helping them to analyze
    their CART reports and fixing some of the problems.  In a single day I
    was able to:
    
    -- Look over a customized system that had > 600 elements registered in
       CM.
    -- Delete over 100 of these elements, because they were either obsolete
       or had been created by programmers "trying things out"
    -- Review the site elements report and identify "rogue" elements listed
       there.  Get a programmer working on the process of importing those
       elements into CM.
    -- Review the CART report, concentrating on elements in status codes B
       and C.  These elements failed the sanity check, in other words, they
       were registered in CM, but no trace could be found in the listed 
       location.  Again, we started the process of fixing up the CM records
       by either deleting them (if not required), or changing the record to
       point to the right location.
    -- Review the CART report for mandatory elements (mostly in status code
       M), and see what changes had been made to these elements on the 
       customer's system.  Try and decide whether these elements should be
       retained under V3.0.
    -- Review the CART report for elements that had been customized but not
       marked as mandatory (mostly P).  There are quite a few elements in 
       this category, some of which will come as a surprise to a customer.
       For example, EMC, EMC1, FC1, WP, and so on.
    -- Generally review the contents of the ALL-IN-1 directiory structure
       to see if there's anything that could cause problems during the
       upgrade, for instance, modified FDLs and/or data files.
    
    Items that can affect the amount of time taken for this type of work:
    
    1. Level of customization on the system. Clearly the more code that's
       been changed, the more work there is to do.
    2. Availability of customer resources who understand the system and
       why changes were made. If you're on your own it will take more
       time to reason out why a change was made.
    3. Knowledge of what the CART can and cannot do. I have stated time and
       time again that it is not a universal panacea, but only a tool that
       needs to be supplemented by human wisdom and intelligence.
    4. Knowledge of ALL-IN-1 V3.0 (plus its patches) and previous versions.
       If you know what you're dealing with you can get a lot more done in
       a set period of time than is otherwise possible.
    
    After all of the work described above was accomplished, a second CART
    run was executed in order to try and achieve "a clean CART report".
    This is one that has:
    
    -- No unknown elements listed in the site elements report.
    -- No elements listed under status codes B and C
    -- No errors reported
    -- A well-defined list of elements in status codes M and P that the
       customer is prepared to deal with just before (the Ms) and 
       immediately after (the Ps) the upgrade.  Of course, there are other
       important status codes that must be reviewed, but these are the 
       most important, in my experience.
    
    Net result:
    
    1 day will do a lot of good work, providing the Digital specialist is
    well prepared and has the required knowledge.  Two days should finish
    the job, after a second CART run is carried out. 
    
    FWIW, Tony