[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

2259.0. "Editing housekeeping batch queue has no effect" by COMICS::BARHAM (Norbert:) Mon Feb 15 1993 08:35

    ALL-IN-1 3.0

    Couldn't find this anywhere...

    If I schedule a housekeeping procedure such as PT and at a later date
    try and edit it to change the queue it submits on from SYS$BATCH to
    A1$BATCH, it has no effect.
    Form SM_SKEDFORM_FCVR_PRE_PHASE1 has a field SM_QUEUE (Ctrl-V) which on
    screen is displayed as A1$BATCH (the new name required) but if I
    Gold-KP7 and GET #SM_QUEUE it says SYS$BATCH??? Anyway, the form has 
    preprocessing to call SM_SKED_DEFAULT_PRE.SCP. This loads the value of
    #SM_QUEUE dependent on #SKED_TYPE which is set to 2 by default and
    hence it does
     
    get #sm_queue=sm_generic_utility_schedule.sa_util_queue[#nbs_run_time]
        	(=SYS$BATCH)

    instead of 

    get #sm_queue=sm_utility_master.sm_util_queue[#util_type] 
    (=a1$batch)



    I think, although I'm not sure, that maybe it should be executing the 
    second command since the value in #SM_QUEUE appears to wrong.

    So why does editing the batch queue not transfer the job to the new batch
    queue ?

    Thanks

    Clive
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2259.1Time for 'official' support?AIMTEC::WICKS_AWALES 10 England 9Wed Feb 17 1993 17:028
    Clive,
    
    Couldn't find any reference to this in STARS so I guess it's SPR
    time. Julie should have a new box of them (:==:)
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks