T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2110.1 | $READ_WIDE is now the profile field READ$WIDE | SCOTTC::MARSHALL | Spitfire Drivers Do It Topless | Mon Jan 18 1993 23:23 | 10 |
| In V3.0 the PST symbol $READ_WIDE has been replaced by the profile
field READ$WIDE. See the script OA$LIB:PST_TO_PROF.SCP (written by a
truly wonderful engineer :-) which is run as part of the (post-)
installation to populate this and other new (in V3.) profile fields
from the corresponding PST symbols.
You'll need to WRITE CHANGE PROFIL this field instead of changing the
PST symbol to get the functionality you require in V3.0
Scott
|
2110.2 | US SWC | IOSG::MAURICE | Because of the architect the building fell down | Tue Jan 19 1993 08:15 | 6 |
| Also users themselves can change the setting on the second form of the
Set Working Conditions form.
Cheers
Stuart
|
2110.3 | Changing profil.read$write no worse, maybe better | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO2-G/M6 | Tue Jan 19 1993 12:15 | 12 |
| Actually, changing the profile field READ$WIDE will be no more
expensive than what you were doing, i.e. changing the PST symbol
$READ_WIDE (which will involve a write to the user's PST file). In
fact, as the PROFILE file is buffered, it may even be cheaper. (Also,
if the user's subprocess has been created, changing $READ_WRITE would
involve a write to the subprocess as well).
And as for it staying in the wrong state, this is exactly as it was -
your change would get saved in the user's PST just as the new change to
READ$WRITE will get saved in the Profile.
Dave.
|
2110.4 | Thanks, with minor modification | ODIXIE::MCLELLAN | Make it so, Mr. Data! | Tue Jan 19 1993 18:02 | 14 |
| Thanks for the help. To clarify the original problem, the 'Read-Wide'
needs to be done on a *temporary* basis, so having the user change his
PROFIL from SWC is not appropriate.
Using the method in .3 (write change profil), I found that I needed to
add:
oa$ini_globals
to make it work. (I think this sets the symbol OA$PROFIL_READ_WIDE
which is probably what the code looks for).
Thanks again,
Colin McLellan
|