| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2050.1 | Working . . . | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri Jan 08 1993 11:44 | 5 |
| I'm *sure* this has been discussed before. Unfortunately I can't
remember what the final story is, so I've asked someone who'll know to
reply...
Graham
|
| 2050.2 | Have fun this weekend... | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Hup Holland Hup | Fri Jan 08 1993 11:44 | 49 |
| Hallo Ajar,
>Sorry, I've spent about more than 1 hour looking for an answer
>to this one - in STARS/ALL-IN-1/VMSNOTES conferences - but in vain.
Which Databases did you open...
Took me 5 minutes to find...
{ALL-IN-1-NOTES} V3.0 Image Activation...Differences?
ATTENDEE_OVERFLOW.DAT, UQM and SITEUQM and some accesses that no
longer take place such as EPM$SRVSHR.EXE, SITECM, CM
{ALL-IN-1-NOTES} Does FCS Require EPM$SRVSHR to be $INSTALLed?
Note 660.3 Does FCS Require EPM$SRVSHR to be $INSTALLed? 3 of 6
CHRLIE::HUSTON 9 lines 11-MAY-1992 14:08
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-< Needs to be in sys$share >-
re .0
For ALL-IN-1 V3.0 things are as Kevin said in .1. It must be on the
system, not necessarily installed. It is referenced in the link,
but never used during run time.
--Bob
===============================================================
> What is SYS$LIBARRY:EPM$SRVSHR ?
EPM$SRVSHR Anyone?
===========================================================================
Note 2582.1 EPM$SRVSHR Anyone? 1 of 3
IOSG::SHOVE "Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C" 6 lines 17-OCT-1991 15:29
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-< Performance monitoring >-
Yes, it's to do with performacne monitoring (DECWatch).
===========================================================================
>it seems it's linked with ALL-IN-1 (V2.4 now, V3.0-1
>on Monday). If so, why is it not installed ?
Happy upgrading this weekend,
Jan
|
| 2050.3 | Yes, but... | UTROP1::BEHARI_A | Ajay Behari @UTO | Fri Jan 08 1993 13:05 | 13 |
| Jan,
>Which Databases did you open...
Yes, I had seen all those entries but didn't find the answer to my
question -> why is the image not installed if it's used by every
ALL-IN-1/user ?
>Happy upgrading this weekend,
Thanks, I'll definitely let you know how it goes.
Ajay.
|
| 2050.4 | Not needed, just linked in. | CHRLIE::HUSTON | | Fri Jan 08 1993 13:24 | 12 |
|
Ajay,
It is not installed because it is not used. It is linked in simply as
an oversight, the FCS use to use EPM for performance monitoring. We
no longer do. The link to it was left in as an oversight during a
hectic time.
If you want, feel free to install it.
--Bob
|
| 2050.5 | Never used | IOSG::DAVIS | Mark Davis | Fri Jan 08 1993 13:30 | 18 |
|
EPM was going to be used in ALL-IN-1 performance monitoring but was
never actualy implemented.
So far as V2.4 is concerned you can rename EPM$SRVSHR.EXE so that the
users never open it. ALL-IN-1 will work but there are risks such as
other applications using it and I am not sure whether it's needed for
the link. A safer course of action is to install it shared so that at
least you save on memory used for buffer space.
EPM is not referenced at all in V3.0 main image. However it is
referenced by the File Cabinet Server and when I renamed it on a test
system the FC server failed to start. However it seems to only open it
once so you don't lose much by having it there.
Mark
|
| 2050.6 | ok, satisfied. | UTROP1::BEHARI_A | Ajay Behari @UTO | Fri Jan 08 1993 14:52 | 8 |
| .4 & .5 are reasonable answers.
I hope the link to the EPM$SRVSHR will be removed from ALL-IN-1,
sometime in a future release/patch/whatever.
Thank you all.
Ajay.
|
| 2050.7 | nudge nudge, wink wink, say no more... | IOSG::STANDAGE | Oink...Oink...Mooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo | Fri Jan 08 1993 15:11 | 10 |
|
Ajay,
Yes, let's say it has most certainly been considered for removal in a
future ALL-IN-1 release/patch ! :-)
Kevin.
|