[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
|
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
2019.0. "New OA$DATA Logical to point to NETWORK.DAT?" by MSAM00::DOUGLASBURKE (Fleeting Edge of Technology?) Mon Dec 28 1992 02:03
Customer question:
Is it possible to allow only one small group of users access to
NETWORK.DAT, instead of all ALL-IN-1 users?
The question stems from the fact that they have higher-level management
to whom they want to allow the ability to "see" special addressees, and
at the same time wish to restrict others in the organization from
having those addressees appear on GOLD-L's etc. (As an aside, this
customer does not and cannot use DDS).
I suggested to them that they might be able to accomplish this through
the use of logicals. In otherwords, for that special group of users,
they could have another OA$DATA logical search list which contains
another directory holding it's own special NETWORK.DAT.
We tried this approach by creating an ALL-IN-1 logical name table, and
pointing to it within the users table. The actual tables, their order
of appearance (search and translation) and contents are all shown below.
Unfortunately, what we found is that ALL-IN-1 does not seem to look at
this new logical name table for translation of OA$DATA.
Therefore I have two questions:
1. Am I barking up the wrong tree...ie. can anyone suggest another
approach?
2. Is ALL-IN-1 specifically looking at the SYSTEM logical name table
for the translation of OA$DATA, and if not, what are we doing
wrong?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(LNM$PROCESS_TABLE) [kernel]
[no protection information]
(OA$LOGICAL_TABLE) [exec] [shareable]
[Protection=(RWED,RWED,,RE)] [Owner=[ALLIN1]]
"OA$DATA" [exec] = "USER_DISK1:[TEST]"
= "OA$SITE_DATA_SHARE"
= "OA$SITE_DATA_LLV"
= "OA$DATA_SHARE"
= "OA$DATA_LLV"
(LNM$GROUP_000560) [kernel] [shareable,group]
[Protection=(RWED,R,R,)] [Owner=[560,0]]
(LNM$SYSTEM_TABLE) [kernel] [shareable,system]
[Protection=(RWE,RWE,R,R)] [Owner=[SYSTEM]]
"OA$DATA" [exec] = "OA$SITE_DATA_SHARE"
= "OA$SITE_DATA_LLV"
= "OA$DATA_SHARE"
= "OA$DATA_LLV"
"OA$DATA_LLV" [exec] = "A1$DATADISK:[ALLIN1.DATA_ENGLISH]"
"OA$DATA_SHARE" [exec] = "A1$DATADISK:[ALLIN1.DATA_SHARE]"
(DECW$LOGICAL_NAMES) [exec] [shareable]
[Protection=(RWED,RWED,R,R)] [Owner=[SYSTEM]]
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2019.1 | OA$DATA_SHARE | UTRTSC::SCHOLLAERT | Hup Holland Hup | Mon Dec 28 1992 07:55 | 14 |
| Hello,
NETWORK.DAT is accessed throught form NETWORK.
This form contains a pointer to the file which uses OA$DATA_SHARE,
not OA$DATA ......
;;.FILE;;
OA$DATA_SHARE:NETWORK.DAT,OA$LIB_SHARE:NETWORK.FDL
Regards,
Jan
|
2019.3 | Separate form for the special users? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Mon Jan 04 1993 10:01 | 13 |
| .1's observation could give you a clue that you could give the
"special" users their own version of the NETWORK form pointing to a
special version of the file.
Generally, we won't translate logicals out of tables other than the
SYSTEM table, unless it's a co-existent/parallel system. This might be
another avenue to explore.
Remember to fix up the housekeeping utilities that convert/fdl and
update across the network the NETWORK.DAT file to include your version
to if necessary.
Graham
|