T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
2017.1 | Migrate | IOSG::CARLIN | Dick Carlin IOSG, Reading, England | Thu Dec 24 1992 11:23 | 10 |
| The quick answer is Yes you need to run sfcp_migrate. Details are in
Installation Guide Part 1, section 10. Other references have been
mentioned in this conference (try dir/tit=shared).
Briefly:
Documents in folder "[username]TEST" are refiled into folder "TEST" and
documents in folder "[username]" are refiled into folder "username".
Dick
|
2017.2 | Only if you are using SFCP! | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Dec 24 1992 11:47 | 7 |
| Of course if you didn't use SFCP other shared folders need to be
handled manually...
The SFCP migrate script is a good place to start stealing code form
tho'!
Graham
|
2017.3 | Oy! | IOSG::MAURICE | Is there life on IOSG? | Thu Dec 24 1992 12:29 | 19 |
| No no no!!!
Ordinary shared folders are not impacted by upgarding to V3.0. They
should still work OK.
SFCP shared folders are a special case and need to be handled by
running the SFCP migration script.
A common trap for shared folders to "stop working" is if the user's
DOCDB containing the shared folders loses its access. Usually the UIC
group protection is used to grant access, and System Managers do like
taking it off when you're not looking ;^)
Also beware that in V3.0 you can only access someone else's shared
folder if your current drawer is your MAIN (default) drawer.
Happy Christmas
Stuart
|
2017.4 | What's now? | BERN02::MUELLERS | Stefan A. M�ller DTN 761-4864 | Mon Jan 04 1993 09:02 | 6 |
| Stuart,
So a common shared folder from V2.4 "[MUELLERS]TEST" has the same name
"[MUELLERS]TEST" in V3.0?
Stefan
|
2017.5 | | IOSG::MAURICE | Is there life on IOSG? | Mon Jan 04 1993 09:06 | 10 |
| Re .4
> So a common shared folder from V2.4 "[MUELLERS]TEST" has the same name
> "[MUELLERS]TEST" in V3.0?
Yes - that's right.
Cheers
Stuart
|
2017.6 | Silly me! | IOSG::CARLIN | Dick Carlin IOSG, Reading, England | Mon Jan 04 1993 17:30 | 11 |
| Apologies.
My earlier reply assumed that you were using SFCP. As Stuart quite
rightly says you can carry on using ordinary shared folders as before.
Another catch (but a more bizarre one) is that a user of another client
could create a folder [xxx]yyy in your main drawer, which you would
never be able to access (the shared folder mechanism would say that
there was no user xxx).
Dick
|