T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1951.1 | Yes, supported. | ATLANA::SHERMAN | Debt Free! | Fri Dec 11 1992 20:48 | 14 |
| Hi Ricardo,
If by "concurrently" your customer means to use the split Sender/Fetcher
capability, they will indeed be supported. While this feature may be
described in the "book of knowledge" (sic), it is also described in the
ALL-IN-1 "Mail Management Guide" official documentation.
FWIW, internal U.S.ofA. production ALL-IN-1 systems have used the split
Sender and Fetcher for years to help pass the abundance of electronic mail
generated within and without the company ... 8^)
Hthy,
Ron
|
1951.2 | Up to you | IOSG::WICKSA | Left alone in IOSG's rabbit warren | Mon Dec 14 1992 11:59 | 15 |
| Ricardo,
I'm not sure what you mean by 'supported' in this context.
I would have thought it was up to each country CSC to determine what is
and isn't supported taking into account what is in the SPD and the
level of back-up support available to them from Engineering.
Of course as Ron said the split Sender/Fetcher is documented in the
Mail Management Guide so in that context it is supported.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
1951.3 | | ANGLIN::HARRISA | lost in the jungle of doubt | Thu Jan 20 1994 19:18 | 9 |
| ALL-IN-1 3.0-1, VMS 5.5-2
my customer is finally looking seriously looking at this. the big
concern that they have is if the SENDER and FETCHER run in the same
queue what is there to prevent 2 SENDERS or 2 FETCHERS to be running at
the same time?
Ann
|
1951.4 | | BRUMMY::MARTIN::BELL | Martin Bell, NETCC, Birmingham UK | Fri Jan 21 1994 08:49 | 10 |
| Ann
you can either customise OAMTIMAIL and OAMTISEND to check xyzzyLOCK.DAT
in a similar way to the standard code, but just for that particular
direction; or why not create a VMS queue for each job, with a JOBLIM
of 1?
mb
or maybe ask in A1INFO to find out what the future might bring!!!!
|