T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1847.1 | How did it get there? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Liverpool 4 Norwich 1 | Wed Nov 25 1992 19:23 | 15 |
| Sunil,
The Distribution List has a STATUS of SENT that's why it's in the
Shared Area, and even worse it's in the WASTEBASKET folder.
Neither of these is good it should be in a [.DOCn] subdirectory in
the DISTRIBUTION LISTS folder with a blank STATUS.
I can't even figure out how to get a distribution list into the same
state but given it somehow got there I'm not too surprised at how the
mail code is behaving (:==:)
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
1847.2 | Investigating .... | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Wed Nov 25 1992 22:45 | 12 |
| Hi Andrew,
The reason why it's in the WASTEBASKET is because the customer deleted
the EM.
The Distribution List are stored in [.MSG] as far as I know. This
behavour is so odd I am really stuck for answers. I will just have to
keep on working at this problem and post anything else I find here.
Thanks
Sunil
|
1847.3 | Customer has 2.4 elements still did not remove them | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Fri Nov 27 1992 06:09 | 20 |
| Hi,
When I did a <debug on, my terminal hung at a certain point in the
script. I ran the script interactively <do wpsend without a problem,
I suspect that the base TXL's are corrupted.
The customer was unable to compile the base tlx's because the
WPMDMP.SCR was present in twice in oa$do, in the site and base area.
This should have been removed as per the pre-installation checks. The
customer has said that they did not remove any of the elements, and had
a number of error message they have thrown away the logfiles :0( a
typical customer).
What's the best way to tackle this problem ? I know we will have to
make sure that we remove the elements as required by the
pre-installtion check is there an easy way of achiving this under 3.0 ?
Thanks
Sunil
|
1847.4 | There's also a known bug with <debug on | IOSG::TALLETT | Gimmee an Alpha colour notebook... | Mon Nov 30 1992 08:01 | 8 |
|
<debug on can sometimes "hang" your terminal by sending funny
characters to it caused by incorrect decoding of the lines of
the TXL not by TXL corruption. Try resetting your terminal
when this happens and see if you can continue.
Regards,
Paul
|
1847.6 | Still plugging away and doing an audit now of installation | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Tue Dec 15 1992 01:04 | 54 |
| Hi Andrew,
Sorry it's taken me sometime to get back to you. The customer had a
number of error messages reported during the installation and did
not keep the logfile (hardcopy) because it was not important !
I have narrowed down the possible reason for the problem I asked her to
do an audit of her system to ensure that the file ownership and
protections are correct. They have a number of systems around
Australia and are in the process of doing this now, the customer has
told me a number of files are owned by SYSTEM.
In my absences Hong Lee obtained further information that is of
interest
Sanity checks on files in OA$DO, OA$SCP and block size
o *.SCP Files in OA$LIB_BRITISH
32 vs 36 (vanilla vs. customer )
o *.SCP Files in OA$LIB_SHARE
693 vs 756 (vanilla vs. customer )
o *.SCP Files in OA$DO_SHARE
322 vs 339 (vanilla vs. customer )
o Size of A1TXL: 1132 vs 1377 blocks (vanilla vs. customer )
o WPSEND.SCP;5 27-NOV-1992 14:17:04.72
WPSEND.SCP;4 12-MAR-1992 09:54:41.69
but they're not different.
It's an educated guess that ownership and protection problems maybe the
cause, because everything works fine from the ALL-IN-1 managers account.
As mentioned if the user has the following distribution lists @DEC1 and
@ABC and the user enters @D gold <L> they get the error message
%OA-W-RECORD_IO_ERROR, Error occurred while attempting to GET the record
-RMS-E-RNF, record not found
If the distribution name is entered in full at the TO: and CC: ie @DEC
everything works fine, this is slightly different from what I said in
the base note.
Any other suggestion would be helpful otherwise I will keep on plugging
away and enter the solution here once I have worked it out. Thanks for
your help and interest.
Sunil
|
1847.7 | More information and logfile | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Tue Dec 22 1992 05:01 | 29 |
| Hi All,
I have narrowed down the problem a bit more now and I find myself at a
loss to explain why this is occuring. As per the previous note I
stated that this problem does not occurs for the ALL-IN-1 managers
account only for user both priviledged and unpriviledged. If I enter
@DEC <ret> that's when the problem occurs and not as stated in -.1, sorry
about that minor oversight. The file ownership and protection problems
have been solved.
Now the remaining problem, it would appear from the trace that the
incorrect WPSEND is being executed. I asked the customer to check the
OA$DO:WPSEND.SCP it's the correct version and I asked the customer to
recompile the A1TXL.TXl it made no difference. To check that the
correct version is in A1TXL.TXL I did the following
1. <do$txl_directory wpsend,do,a1txl - the wpsend.scp was present
2. <do$txl_list wpsend,do,a1txl - compared the actual ie
<list oa$do:wpsend.scp and the one in A1TXL.TXL they are exactly the
same minus the comments.
A logfile contains details of my login session on the customer's
system. I would be grateful for your help and advise the file
specification is RIPPER::USER$TSC:[SETHI]DHHCS_122192.LOG;1 the
protection is set to W:R.
Thanks for your help in advance,
Sunil
|
1847.9 | 3rd party software caused the problem | GIDDAY::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Tue Jan 05 1993 02:14 | 20 |
| Hi All and Happy New Year,
I have finally managed to track down the cause of this problem. The
customer has a 3rd party package called Queue File it's a bit like
Xtree.
If the following command was not executed $set command
<disk>:queue_file prior to the user invoking ALL-IN-1 the Send option
would not work, if it was all would work as expected.
The customer will liase with the 3rd party and hopefully get to the
bottom of all of this. I will keep you posted on the progress
providing the customer get's back to me.
Well this one had me pulling my hair out, I wonder if Digital will
cover the cost of a hair transplant.
From a bolding man downunder :-),
Sunil
|
1847.10 | Same problem i Norway | BGO02::ARNEM | Arne Moe @NWO - Digital Services Norway | Fri Jan 22 1993 14:22 | 12 |
| Hi,
I've got the same problem, with my Norwegian ALL-IN-1 3.0.
If we try /nocustomize it dosn't help, and the problem still
appears from the WP menu(bu no problemo from EM menu) when
the user <TAB> down to the SUBJECT field.
There's a trace of this appearing in BERGEN::*.trace.
Any hints....
...Arne
|
1847.11 | Somethings to check | BUSHIE::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Sun Jan 24 1993 22:43 | 24 |
| Hi Arne,
Did you see my previous note as I stated I discovered that a $ set
command was the problem if you did not have it. A 3rd party software
package was installed that caused the problem.
I would suggest that you look at the following
1. OAINI.SCP and OAINI.COM if they are used to see if they have
something that may cause the problem.
2. Look at LOGIN.COM and SYLOGIN.COM.
3. Are there some accounts that work and others that do not ? If so
check for differences.
I started to examine everything from the time the users logged in to
the time they went into WP menu and entered the send command. It may
not be a 3rd party package or it maybe, you just have to look, I
couldn't access your node.
Good luck,
Sunil
|
1847.13 | | BUSHIE::SETHI | Man from Downunder | Mon Jan 25 1993 23:02 | 22 |
| Hi Arne,
>But I discovered somthing very interesting, In the EMFWHD (from the WP menu)
>form doing a select on a private (customer do not use system dist.list)
>dist.list AND a <RET> the error occurs, BUT doing a <TAB> instead the error
>do not occur and everything is OK.
Same thing happened to me.
I think that you may have misunderstood me regarding OAINI.SCP,
OAINI.COM, LOGIN.COM and SYLOGIN.COM. What I found was that the
customer had a 3rd party package and if they did not have $ set command
<whatever>, they had they problem. So puting in exit in the files will
not help.
Ask the customer if they have a 3rd party package like the one I
mentioned. Alot more information is required about the customers
installation, it could be a logical that's causing a problem.
Sorry that's the best I can offer for the time being.
Sunil
|