[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

1843.0. "ADS Archiving Procedure Appears To Hang in a Loop, Never Completes. Solved in 3.0 ?" by BACHUS::LAROCHE (Veerle Laroche) Tue Nov 24 1992 15:42

One of our customers has upgraded to 3.0 and is now checking if the problems
known in 2.4 have been solved in 3.0.  One of these problems is the 'infinite
loop problem' of the ADS procedure.  The STARS article is attached to this
note.

He checked if the changes applied to the archive_sys_user_folder.scp in 2.4
have been incorporated in 3.0.  According to him, the procedure has not been
changed to include the fixes described in the article.

Does he have to apply the STARS article again to his 3.0 system?

Thanks,

Veerle

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADS Archiving Procedure Appears To Hang in a Loop, Never Completes

PRODUCT: ALL-IN-1 V2.4

SOURCE: Customer Support Center/Atlanta USA

PROBLEM:

The ADS archiving housekeeping procedure will go into an infinite
loop.  The batch job submitted appears to be taking an abnormally
long time to process, and it does not appear to be archiving
documents into the archive area on the system.  It appears as
though some users (at the beginning alphabetically of the profile)
have been processed but users at the end of the alphabet have not.

<<< Remainder of article removed by ALL-IN-1 Conference Moderator GAP >>>

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1843.1RTFCR?AIMTEC::WICKS_ALiverpool 4 Norwich 1Tue Nov 24 1992 17:0117
    Veerle,
    
    Firstly, when posting STARS articles please remove the "hidden text"
    particularly the authors name.
    
    Secondly the reason the script you mention hasn't changed is that it
    was deleted/removed in v3.0!!
    
    Take a look at the customer's CART report - they did run the CART
    didn't they??? the 13th of the 500 or so elements in STATUS A
    is:
    
    ARCHIVE_SYS_USER_FOLDERS               DO   ENGLISH
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks
1843.2And CABINET NEXT_FOLDER is fixed!IOSG::MAURICEHex 20 travellerTue Nov 24 1992 17:1510
    Hi,
    
    To add another comment extra to Andy, it is worth noting that the
    underlying problem was a bug in the CABINET NEXT_FOLDER function. When
    this was fixed in V3.0 the workrounds required in the V2.4 version were
    no longer needed.
    
    Cheers
    
    Stuart