Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hello: I am looking into a workaround for a customer. Allendale Insurance is *very* concerned about the differences in behavior of formsets between V2.3 and V2.4 of ALL-In-1. Below is an example: They have a formset which contains 3 forms. All of the forms are arg forms. The first form in the set has a clear area defined as 0 to 23, taking up the entire screen. The second form is an overlay form which clears 10 to 23, the bottom of the screen. The third form clears 0 to 23, the entire screen. On the first form, there is a .form_set which calls the other two forms. Not all of the named data is on the first form. V2.3 Call up the first form in the set. Hit next screen. The second forms overlays the bottom of the first form. Hit next screen. The third form paints over the entire screen. Hit previous screen. The second form comes back overlaying the first form in the set. This behavior occurs in V2.3 of ALL-IN-1. Also, if while the second form is on the screen, you hit Ctrl/W the top half of the screen is not cleared. In V2.4, the behavior is entirely different. Call up the first form. Hit next screen. The second form overlays the bottom of the screen and on the top halp of the screen is part of the menu from which the formset was called. Hit next screen and the third form paints fine. Hit previous screen and the second form reappears overlaying the menu again. On their system if in V2.4 you hit Ctrl/W while the second form is on the screen, it clears the top half of the screen leaving it blank. I cannot reproduce this clearing of the top half of the screen. Note: V3.0 works as described for V2.3. The customer can not upgrade to V3.0 due to customization investments. I think they would be *very* happy with a workaround to their problem. But they would possibly settle for the resons why this change occurs and some suggestions they might try to fix the problem. Any Help is Appreciated, Tim
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1825.1 | Overlay and CTRL/W | AIMTEC::BUTLER_T | Mon Nov 23 1992 14:56 | 13 | |
I realize Allendale has not learned how to spell ALL-IN-1 (I thought that would get a comment) and I realize that there is not much we can do about this. This is a situation, and any feedback we could use would be gratefull. Otherwise, the customer will go the sales exec route and cld. Thanks, Tim | |||||
1825.2 | Will the CLD do any good? | SIOG::T_REDMOND | Thoughts of an Idle Mind | Mon Nov 23 1992 15:22 | 15 |
Tim, I haven't commented so far, but it's mostly because I don't have a set of forms that do what Allendale have been up to and I don't have the time to build one. Form processing does change from time, normally to correct reported bugs, and it is quite likely that a fix has closed off one of the undocumented loopholes that facilitated the behaviour Allendale wants to recapture. I'm sure some would comment further if a set of forms, in a library, was made available on the network (not posted in this conference). Can Allendale provide a copy of such a library, complete with all of the named data they use? Tony | |||||
1825.3 | Will set-up pointers | AIMTEC::BUTLER_T | Mon Nov 23 1992 18:46 | 12 | |
Thank You. Laurie will post a pointer to the forms, in another reply. -< Will the CLD do any good? >- No. That is why I am trying to avoid all the calls and paperwork and ... Thanks, Tim | |||||
1825.4 | One big .flg file. | AIMTEC::SIMPSON_L | Mon Nov 23 1992 19:19 | 233 | |
Below is a listing of the three arg forms I set up. Thanks. Laurie ! FMS Form Description Application Aid ! Version V2.4 FORM NAME='TESTARG1' AREA_TO_CLEAR=1:23 WIDTH=80 BACKGROUND=CURRENT ; TEXT (1,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (2,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (3,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (4,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (5,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (6,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (7,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (8,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (9,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (10,1) 'AAAAAAAAAA' ; TEXT (11,1) 'TESTARG1' ; TEXT (11,33) ' Arg Form Title ' BOLD ; TEXT (15,2) 'Field 1:' ; TEXT (17,2) 'Field 2:' ; TEXT (19,2) 'Field 3:' ; TEXT (22,2) 'Enter information and press RETURN' ; ATTRIBUTE_DEFAULTS FIELD CLEAR_CHARACTER=' ' NOAUTOTAB BLANK_FILL NOBLINKING NOBOLD NOREVERSE NOUNDERLINE NODISPLAY_ONLY ECHO NOFIXED_DECIMAL LEFT_JUSTIFIED NOSUPERVISOR_ONLY NOSUPPRESS NOUPPERCASE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_1' (15,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_2' (17,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_3' (19,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; ORDER BEGIN_WITH = 1 NAME='FIELD_1' NAME='FIELD_2' NAME='FIELD_3' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=1 NAME='.TYPE' DATA='ARG/OVERLAY/HARD="YOUR arg form name"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=2 NAME='.FORM_SET' DATA='TESTARG2,TESTARG3' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=3 NAME='FIELD_1' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 1"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=4 NAME='FIELD_2' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 2"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=5 NAME='FIELD_3' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 3"' ; END_OF_FORM NAME='TESTARG1' ; ! FMS Form Description Application Aid ! Version V2.4 FORM NAME='TESTARG2' AREA_TO_CLEAR=10:23 WIDTH=80 BACKGROUND=CURRENT ; TEXT (11,1) 'TESTARG2' ; TEXT (11,33) ' Arg Form Title ' BOLD ; TEXT (15,2) 'Field 4:' ; TEXT (17,2) 'Field 5:' ; TEXT (19,2) 'Field 6:' ; TEXT (22,2) 'Enter information and press RETURN' ; ATTRIBUTE_DEFAULTS FIELD CLEAR_CHARACTER=' ' NOAUTOTAB BLANK_FILL NOBLINKING NOBOLD NOREVERSE NOUNDERLINE NODISPLAY_ONLY ECHO NOFIXED_DECIMAL LEFT_JUSTIFIED NOSUPERVISOR_ONLY NOSUPPRESS NOUPPERCASE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_4' (15,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_5' (17,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_6' (19,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; ORDER BEGIN_WITH = 1 NAME='FIELD_4' NAME='FIELD_5' NAME='FIELD_6' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=1 NAME='.TYPE' DATA='ARG/OVERLAY/HARE=''YOUR arg form name"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=2 NAME='FIELD_4' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 1"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=3 NAME='FIELD_5' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 2"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=4 NAME='FIELD_6' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 3"' ; END_OF_FORM NAME='TESTARG2' ; ! FMS Form Description Application Aid ! Version V2.4 FORM NAME='TESTARG3' AREA_TO_CLEAR=1:23 WIDTH=80 BACKGROUND=CURRENT ; TEXT (1,1) 'BBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (2,1) 'BBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (3,1) 'BBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (4,1) 'BBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (5,1) 'BBBBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (6,1) 'BBBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (7,1) 'BBBBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (8,1) 'BBBBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (9,1) 'BBBBBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (10,1) 'BBBBBBBBBBBB' ; TEXT (11,1) 'TESTARG3' ; TEXT (11,33) ' Arg Form Title ' BOLD ; TEXT (15,2) 'Field 7:' ; TEXT (17,2) 'Field 8:' ; TEXT (19,2) 'Field 9:' ; TEXT (22,2) 'Enter information and press RETURN' ; ATTRIBUTE_DEFAULTS FIELD CLEAR_CHARACTER=' ' NOAUTOTAB BLANK_FILL NOBLINKING NOBOLD NOREVERSE NOUNDERLINE NODISPLAY_ONLY ECHO NOFIXED_DECIMAL LEFT_JUSTIFIED NOSUPERVISOR_ONLY NOSUPPRESS NOUPPERCASE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_7' (15,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_8' (17,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; FIELD NAME='FIELD_9' (19,11) PICTURE=30'X' UNDERLINE ; ORDER BEGIN_WITH = 1 NAME='FIELD_7' NAME='FIELD_8' NAME='FIELD_9' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=1 NAME='.TYPE' DATA='ARG/OVERLAY/HARD="YOUR arg form name"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=2 NAME='FIELD_7' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 1"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=3 NAME='FIELD_8' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 2"' ; NAMED_DATA INDEX=4 NAME='FIELD_9' DATA='/HARD="Description of field 3"' ; END_OF_FORM NAME='TESTARG3' ; | |||||
1825.5 | SIOG::T_REDMOND | Thoughts of an Idle Mind | Fri Nov 27 1992 14:20 | 8 | |
Tim, I've had a look and can't see any quick way around this problem. It's curious that things should have changed between V2.3 -> V2.4 and then back again at V3.0. What customization problems are preventing Allendale from moving to V3.0? Cheers, Tony | |||||
1825.6 | Allendales' CM | AIMTEC::BUTLER_T | Tue Dec 01 1992 15:33 | 16 | |
Tony, Allendale "reee-designed" CM completely! They went way beyond anything CMA would do. They have many different solutions they market in the Insurance Industry. I worked some INSTALL/EXECUTE Issues with them and found that only one person in their programming organization understood their "CM." It is their own problem as V3.0 CM+ could work for them. I am just trying to save lots of calls, cld's, etc.. Thanks, Tim | |||||
1825.7 | What did they change? | IOSG::SCM | CM+ Development Team from Torino | Wed Dec 02 1992 08:07 | 9 |
Hi Tim, Just out of curiousity, what kind of functionality did they add? Something which isn't available in V3.0 either? Ciao, Simon | |||||
1825.8 | Their way -vs- our way | AIMTEC::BUTLER_T | Wed Dec 02 1992 13:19 | 20 | |
Simon, They went to their own elaborate scheme using vms logicals as they *saw* it. The logicals were used to create a product (by customer) specific save set (libraries, TXL's, etc..) that would install in the site area on the target machine. Iain and I spent many a day working with VMS and logicals helping them to make it work? In fact the actual working system was more complicated ((:^)) than CM+. It was more a matter of *MY WAY* than CM's way. I also suspect that it is easier for them to do it their way (2.3) than to spend the resources to convert. Tim (Now I will call them and give them another reason to go to V3.0) |