T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1642.1 | Bug????? | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Wed Oct 21 1992 19:44 | 17 |
| We changed this in V3.0 to use the PROFIL fields directly, or rather
the PROFIL_mumble special symbols instead of PST symbols. Indeed we
call OA$LIB:PST_TO_PROF.SCP and PST_TO_PROF2.SCP to copy the current
setting of the PST symbls into the profile.
The Named Data on SWC has a /PUT_SAVE to the PST symbol, but I think we
did that for backwards compatability reasons so that any application
that was using the PST symbol would still work. Since SWC has a /DATA
to PROFIL, it writes through to the file anyway.
The SWC option on US has a OA$INI_GLOBALS in it to reset all the global
symbols again after the profile reciord has been updated.
WP C calls DOCDSC which has a /VALID on the folder field which calls
FOLDER.SCP, which tests the PST symbol...
Graham
|
1642.2 | | KERNEL::LOAT | Bored....Bored....BORED!!!! | Thu Oct 22 1992 10:41 | 18 |
| Hi Graham
�We changed this in V3.0 to use the PROFIL fields directly, or rather
�the PROFIL_mumble special symbols instead of PST symbols. Indeed we
�call OA$LIB:PST_TO_PROF.SCP and PST_TO_PROF2.SCP to copy the current
�setting of the PST symbls into the profile.
What did you change? I've looked at a trace of document creation, and
the only checking I can find is against the value of
$NEW_FOLDER_PROMPT. I've also looked through a trace of editting a
profile, and I can't find anywhere where it does anything to the users
PST or creates a permanent symbol $NEW_FOLDER_PROMPT.
Bug? Definitely!
Steve.
|
1642.3 | Looking forward to your SPR :-) | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Thu Oct 22 1992 19:02 | 10 |
| Steve,
What I meant was that we changed all the things on SWC that used to be
PST sysmbols into PROFIL fields. And, as you can see, we made a good
job of changing the field setting from SWC. We just forgot to chnage
the code that tested the symbol.....
Sorry,
Graham
|