T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1590.1 | customization? | AIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_D | Why would CSC specialists need training? | Fri Oct 09 1992 18:10 | 7 |
| Correct on the first part, form TWOCAL is not in v3.0. I turned
trace on and accessed TM ET from a v2.4 system (v2.3 system not
readily available). There is no call made to form TWOCAL. I'd
guess we're dealing with a customization of some sort. This should
have been identified by CART.
Dave Zaniewski
|
1590.2 | Maybe this is a feature !! | KAOT01::R_OBAS | | Fri Oct 09 1992 20:37 | 17 |
| No customization. Sorry I was not very clear in the base note. Let me try
again.
From the previous versions you can do these options in TM.
TM ET TC , type in the username then the TWOCAL form pops out.
Now in V3,
TM ET TC, type the username and comes back with an error that
it cannot find TWOCAL form , which makes sense because it
does not exist.
So is the TC (hidden) option while in ET (form TMET) is now
obsolete or could this be a FEATURE ?
thanks,
ricardo
|
1590.3 | More news as we get it... | SCOTTC::MARSHALL | Do you feel lucky? | Fri Oct 09 1992 20:49 | 16 |
| Hi,
First there's nothing "hidden" about TC, it's on the second GOLD-M screen from
form TMET.
Second, TMET called TWOCAL in V2.4, and calls TWOCAL in V3.0, so nothing's
changed there.
The problem appears to be that the TWOCAL form is marked as "Deleted" in the
V3.0 build-control data file. Hence it would not have been included in the
V3.0 kit.
As for when and why it was deleted, this involves searching a very large
notes conference, so I may be some time... :-)
Scott
|
1590.5 | The scoop... | SCOTTC::MARSHALL | Do you feel lucky? | Fri Oct 09 1992 21:16 | 12 |
| OK, I'm back...
It appears that TWOCAL was removed, along with a lot of other TM stuff, very
early in V3.0 development, under the heading "Remove V2.2 TM user interface".
Either someone was over-zealous and removed two much, or the removal of TWOCAL
was intentional (why?) and not enough ws removed.
So there you have it. I will mail the engineer concerned with this info, in
the hope that they can suggest what to do next.
Scott
|
1590.8 | | KAOFS::R_OBAS | | Tue Oct 20 1992 15:16 | 10 |
| Hello,
Does anyone know if I can use an ENGLISH TWOCAL form to a BRITISH
language ALL-IN-1 ?. I don't have any access to a BRITISH ALL-IN-1
to make comparison. The system in question in .0 was an install from
scratch. The V2.3 system was English and the V3.0 British kit does not
have the OBSOLETE*.FLB so there's no old TWOCAL form.
Thanks, Ricardo
|
1590.9 | use English TWOCAL | OASS::GUEST_D | Stefan Hofmann currently @ALF | Tue Oct 20 1992 15:45 | 11 |
| Hello Ricardo,
if I understnd the previous replies correctlz then
- TWOCAL is gone while the rest of this functionality remained
unchanged and
- you still have access to a TWOCAL form in ENGLISH but not in BRITISH.
If both of the above is true, then YES, you can use the ENGLISH TWOCAL
form for your BRITISH ALL-IN-1 system.
Stefan
|