| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1286.1 | Sending or receiving? | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Fri Aug 21 1992 09:49 | 14 | 
|  | In the last column of your display, do you want to record that you have ASKED 
for a read receipt, or that you have RECEIVED one?
If it's ASKED, then that's easy - just get the RR field from CAB$.
If you want to see if you've received a RR, then you've got a lot of work to 
do! (You'd need an line for each recipient, and some sort of function which 
can read each of your incoming messages and check to see if they're RRs and 
who they're from. Unfortunately, ALL-IN-1 doesn't receive read receipts in 
MRIF format - they arrive as ordinary text messages).
However, maybe someone's done all this already, so I'll move over.
grahame
 | 
| 1286.2 | Misunderstanding about previous request..Answer again | DEKVC::DAEHEEKIM |  | Mon Aug 24 1992 01:26 | 12 | 
|  |     Maybe there is a misunderstanding about my request.
    I want to display whether the Receiver read the mail or not,not whether
    I asked Read_Receipt or not.
    
    Until now , we requested READ_RECEIPT on each mail , and POSTMASTER
    send a read_receipt mail to the Original Author in the batch mode.
    
    But our customer asked me , how can they display the information
    - at least one of the Receivers read the mail or not - interactively
    without setting the READ_RECEIPT field  'YES'.
    
    - DaeHee
 | 
| 1286.3 | no? | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Mon Aug 24 1992 10:11 | 15 | 
|  | Well, it looks to me that the answer is No.
The only way of discovering if a recipient has read a message (and this is not 
fully accurate anyway) is to ask for a read-receipt and then get one. If mail 
is going out via Message Router, how does the customer think you can get 
interactive access?
If the customer is worried that the sender should not HAVE to set read-receipt 
request, then you can customise the mail header forms so that Y is the 
default. But you will still have the problem of matching the read recepit 
with the message which asked for it.
Sorry (I hope I've understood what you are asking for)
grahame
 | 
| 1286.4 | Possible | IOSG::TALLETT | Arranging bits for a living... | Tue Aug 25 1992 08:07 | 7 | 
|  |     
    	Am I mixing this up, or is this the X.400 read receipt collation
    	feature? If so, you'll possibly get it if we possibly were to
    	support all the X.400 features in a possible future release.
    
    Regards,
    Paul
 | 
| 1286.5 | It has been done, somewhere | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Tue Aug 25 1992 16:31 | 9 | 
|  |     Someone has done this (provide a reciept correlation feature using our
    current read receipts).
    
    Sorry, but I can't remeber who - it was mentioned at a US DECUS some
    time ago.
    
    Maybe this will jog someone's memory?
    
    D.
 |