Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
A major ALL-IN-1 customer tried tailoring ALL-IN-1 V2.4 to sort DDS output. I'm no ALL-IN-1 Programmer but I think they used a BIND/SORT. Does that make sense? They found the performance of the tailoring less than acceptable and would like to know if there is any likelihood of the ALL-IN-1 V3 implementation being any quicker. Grateful for your help David
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1259.1 | Aren't you the expert? | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | It wasn't supposed to end this way | Wed Aug 19 1992 23:11 | 10 |
David, Have you ever read the definitive work on DDS and ALL-IN-1 written by one David Hare? I think the performance of sorting is the same in v3.0. Regards, Andrew.D.Wicks |