T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1203.1 | OA$FORM_DISPOSE should work... | HYTIDE::CREAMER | | Fri Aug 07 1992 17:41 | 8 |
|
> Is there another symbol we should interrogate instead ?
How about checking OA$FORM_DISPOSE??
HTH,
Jack
|
1203.2 | where's it gone then ? | COMICS::BARHAM | Norbert: | Fri Aug 07 1992 18:21 | 6 |
| Does this mean that $OA$TERMINATOR has been removed. Is this change of
functionality documented ?
Thanks
Clive
|
1203.3 | functionality removed ? Why ? | COMICS::BARHAM | Norbert: | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:11 | 11 |
| Can someone confirm/deny whether this symbol has been removed or not ?
Customer is now having to rewrite all their applications to use
OA$FORM_DISPOSE in the belief that it has gone. Is this really the case ?
The symbol has been documented since at least 2.3 days and still is so
I would have thought this may effect a number of customers. It is not
acceptable to remove functionality that is still documented.
Thanks
Clive
|
1203.4 | Looks like an opportunity | MDCRAB::HOWARD | Our business is computers not money | Tue Aug 11 1992 16:54 | 8 |
| You're right. It seems to work under V2.4, but not under V3.0. I
assume he was checking the DCL symbol OA$TERMINATOR in the subprocess
rather than going back to ALL-IN-1 to read $OA$TERMINATOR. The latter
is much slower since permanent symbols are stored in a file. I would
guess that an SPR is in order. This kind thing seems to happen with
every new version, unfortunately.
Ben
|
1203.5 | ALL-IN-1 or WPS-PLUS? | SHALOT::NICODEM | Avoid traffic; leave work at noon | Wed Aug 12 1992 15:01 | 9 |
| Are they using WPS-PLUS? This may be a change in how WPS-PLUS is now
handling Gold-K... $OA$TERMINATOR was simply a symbol in the user's permanent
symbol table that was used to reflect the terminator value that was also stored
in the DCL symbol TERMINATOR in the subprocess. While I realize that we are
attempting to encourage alternatives to the subprocess, and to slower storage
such as the permanent symbol table, I would agree that this seems to be an over-
sight if, indeed, it is no longer working as before.
F
|
1203.6 | SPR/CLD? | COMICS::BARHAM | Norbert: | Wed Aug 12 1992 16:23 | 11 |
| Well it's WPS-PLUS within ALL-IN-1 3.0 and it is the symbol
$OA$TERMINATOR they're trying to read.
Would I be wasting my time raising a high level SPR/CLD 'coz that's
what they want ? Can anyone give me a good sales pitch to get them off
using $OA$TERMINATOR ? I've tried to tell them it's slower and to use
OA$FORM_DISPOSE but they weren't impressed!
Thanks
Clive
|
1203.7 | Another reason | IOSG::NEWLAND | Richard Newland, IOSG, REO1-D/4A | Wed Aug 12 1992 17:46 | 15 |
| I looked at a system running ALL-IN-1 V2.4 and WPS-PLUS V4.0 and that does
not set $OA$TERMINATOR. WPS-PLUS/VMS V4.1 also does not set $OA$TERMINATOR.
There is no code in ALL-IN-1, including the EDIT function which is called
to invoke the WPS-PLUS editor, which assigns a value to a symbol called
$OA$TERMINATOR. Therefore, as you have found, it appears to have been set
by the WPS-PLUS code, but only in V3.1 and earlier versions.
Another reason for using OA$FORM_DISPOSE is that any script code using
$OA$TERMINATOR is dependent on WPS-PLUS being used, and may not work
correctly if another editor is used.
Richard
|