T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1202.1 | Linked and Dynamic loaded message symbols? | CESARE::EIJS | All in 1 Piece | Fri Aug 07 1992 14:14 | 20 |
|
Hi Julie,
I can't give you full details of the technical implementations, only
the following:
- The new 'literal symbols' are held in some kind of hash table. They're
not actually linked in the OA$MAIN image, as is done with message
files like OAMESS.MSG, MAIL.MSG
- Message which are called by code routines still reside in files like
OAMESS.MSG and MAIL.MSG. (Let's call them) Scripting messages now
in the new hash table
- It was decided that CM would support the new 'Literal symbols' and
the old MSG files
Only a start...
Ciao,
Simon
|
1202.2 | Easy... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Fri Aug 07 1992 14:42 | 16 |
| So you can fix this message, but you have to edit MAIL.MSG without the
benefit of CM, $mess/compile it twice, once with /TEXT and once with
/NOTEXT, put the objects in OALLV.OLB and DMPLUS.OLB respectively,
relink the image.... I think this is still described in the Management
Guide somewhere.
Are they put off yet?
Graham
PS there are at least five other uses of "canceled" just in MAIL.MSG.
PPS So is this going to be fixed in a PFR Simon?
PPPS Canceled is the "correct" spelling in the US, not that that counts
for anything (he said ducking :-) )
|
1202.3 | Two different types of message file | SCOTTC::MARSHALL | Pearl-white, but slightly shop-soiled | Fri Aug 07 1992 15:19 | 16 |
| Just to clarify:
The *.A1$MSG files contain messages used in scripts, named data, etc. They are
an ALL-IN-1 specific file type. They are "compiled" with OA$MESCOMP to produce
"section" files, *.A1$SECTION, which do not need to be linked into the ALL-IN-1
image. CM provides a high-level way to do this.
The *.MSG files are VMS message files containing messages used in code. They
must be "compiled" with MESSAGE, and the resulting object files linked into the
image.
The *.A1$MSG files were created new in V3.0 to make it easier to customise and
add new messages to ALL-IN-1, and also because the *.MSG files were becoming
overloaded.
Scott
|
1202.4 | PFR? | CESARE::EIJS | All in 1 Piece | Fri Aug 07 1992 15:53 | 13 |
|
Graham,
> PPS So is this going to be fixed in a PFR Simon?
Futures? In this place? And you, out of all moderators, ask me? ;-)...
CM Should support all elements within ALL-IN-1 (the OA application).
*.MSG files are part of it so I suppose...
Ciao,
Simon
|
1202.5 | | IOSG::MAURICE | Ceci n'est pas une note | Fri Aug 07 1992 16:45 | 9 |
| > PPPS Canceled is the "correct" spelling in the US, not that that counts
> for anything (he said ducking :-) )
Presumably this is a bug in the British kit. Who owns those problems I
wonder?
;^)
Stuart
|
1202.6 | | PAULUS::HOFMANN | Stefan Hofmann, LC Frankfurt, ISE | Mon Aug 10 1992 12:53 | 5 |
| The Localization Center (or is it Localisation Centre) should take care
of the language specific details :-)
Stefan
|
1202.7 | Info | SCOTTC::MARSHALL | Pearl-white, but slightly shop-soiled | Mon Aug 10 1992 14:01 | 8 |
| re .5 and .6
The majority of US-specific spellings are not changed in the British kit. I
don't think "bugging" it will do much, as it is an intentional decision not to
change the spelling. Also, the Localisation Centre doesn't produce the British
kit; it's done here in engineering, in parallel with the base (US) kit.
Scott
|
1202.8 | | FORTY2::ASH | Grahame Ash @REO | Mon Aug 10 1992 19:06 | 16 |
| >>>>
The majority of US-specific spellings are not changed in the British kit. I
don't think "bugging" it will do much, as it is an intentional decision not to
change the spelling. Also, the Localisation Centre doesn't produce the British
kit; it's done here in engineering, in parallel with the base (US) kit.
Scott
>>>>
This seems a little bizarre (IMHO and all that stuff!) So what is the British
kit? Does it contain a spellchecker which would flag the product's own error
messages as being spelled wrong?! I'd always thought that the changes to make
the product look 'British' rather than American were fairly trivial . . . are
customers supposed to do it themselves now?
grahame
|
1202.9 | V3.0 MG missing other bits too | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | DEC Mail Works for ME sometimes | Tue Aug 11 1992 00:26 | 18 |
| And avoiding all the noise in this reply
The way to 'customise' messages in .MSG files appears to be
yet another piece that got lost in the MAnagement Guide for v3.0
like Moving ALL-IN-1. So for Julie's benefit it's on page 16-21 of
the v2.4 Management Guide.
Also look at the index for the management guide in v3 and you'll see
that it has entries that point to v2.4 sections of the book?
I know i'm naturally skeptical but did these sections just get lost
or were they removed?
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
1202.10 | British Explanation... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue Aug 11 1992 11:21 | 21 |
| Re .9
I'm not sure it's noise, but perhaps a valid discussion of interest to
British readers.
I notice from your spelling of "skeptical" that you have now switched
to loading the "American" spelling checker when you get up in the
morning :-)
re .8
The British version, even when produced by the British Local
Engineering Group, rather than the Central Engineering Group (who sit
about 50 yards away from each other :-) ) never had very many changes
to the spelling. the only things that are changed are replacment of Zip
Code with Post Code, use of the British Spelling Dictionaries, and
about two hundred (only a slight exaggeration!) changes of default
language to British. Corrsesponding changes to Help and CBIs complete
the alterations.
Graham
|
1202.11 | | FROIS1::HOFMANN | Stefan Hofmann, LC Frankfurt, ISE | Wed Aug 12 1992 19:03 | 18 |
| re: several.
of course I know that the British variant is produced in Reading,
because I work in the Localization Center. I always though that it's
not correct to discuss American or British English issues in the BIV,
since there should be a British and US-American variant of the BIV
who take care of language and country specifics. (remember: BIV = Basic
International Version).
I guess it wasn't a good time for a joke :-)
So, please forget that I replied to this topic.
re .10:
Graham,
not to forget the famous "�" sign !
Stefan
|
1202.12 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | Oh God. | Tue Feb 16 1993 15:23 | 18 |
|
With very little help from the documentation, I found some files in
[allin1.sources_<language>] called SITE$%%.A1$MSG. It seems these files
should be used to contain customisations to message symbols!
I wanted to change the value for EM$_TELNO, so like a conscientious
ALL-IN-1 manager, I copied the SITE$EM.A1$MSG to the dev area added a
line
TELNO <New text>
compiled it, installed it and guess what - nothing! I still get
the original text when I print or read a document.
Can someone shed some light?
Steve
|
1202.13 | Move to live | IOSG::BILSBOROUGH | Just testing. Please ignore!!! | Tue Feb 16 1993 15:53 | 10 |
|
Did you move it to live
Try MLA on the element
then AM PME enter the element name in hte index arg form and enter ML
to move it to live
Then do SM CSZ CMF to compile it.
Mike
|
1202.14 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | Oh God. | Tue Feb 16 1993 16:53 | 4 |
| > Did you move it to live
Yes.
|
1202.15 | Remember to exit ALL-IN-1 | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | WALES 10 England 9 | Tue Feb 16 1993 17:28 | 9 |
| Steve,
Make sure you log out of ALL-IN-1 and back in. These 'message files'
are VMS global sections so you won't see an updated one until
you reactivate ALL-IN-1.
regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
1202.16 | | ECCGY4::HAIGH | Oh God. | Fri Feb 19 1993 13:35 | 5 |
|
I had restarted ALL-IN-1. In the end I changed the boilerplate.
Steve
|
1202.17 | CMF'ing the .A1$MSG file helps too | SIOG::T_REDMOND | Thoughts of an Idle Mind | Sun Feb 21 1993 15:16 | 7 |
| I trust the CMF option (customize message file) was used from the
"Manage a Customized System" menu to compile the contents of the
altered .A1$MSG file into a new global section file? I do this all the
time and have never seen a problem. But then again, I am kind of
strange!
;-) Tony
|