T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1142.1 | | IOSG::WDAVIES | There can only be one ALL-IN-1 Mail | Wed Jul 29 1992 17:12 | 4 |
| No its when it gets sent - either in express mail in the users context,
or in the postmasters context.
Winton
|
1142.2 | Under what circumstances ... | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Thu Jul 30 1992 11:57 | 11 |
| Re .1
I am aware that a .COM file is executed at Send time. My question is under what
circumstances will this execute. If during the execution at Create time the
.CMU file changed the address from FAX to FAX!12345++@FAXMBX, will FAX.COM be
executed at Send time?
Thanks,
Cb.
|
1142.3 | Well, there may be a problem here . . . | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Thu Jul 30 1992 16:32 | 11 |
| Well, it's supposed to be. As long as there is a suitable delimiter
between the part of the address that is an entry in the local profile
file (FAX in your example) and the rest of the string. I think the
guide uses _
However, this seems to have got broken in v3.0. I'm surprised that we
haven't had any bug reports about this.
I'll do some more checking later (may have to be tomorrow).
Dave.
|
1142.4 | It does work, but only with underscore | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Fri Jul 31 1992 17:03 | 22 |
| Well, I've looked at this again.
The answer is that the Guide is slightly mis-leading.
It gives _ as an example of the delimiter between the part of the
address that can be looked up in the profile and the rest of the
string. In fact, _ is the ONLY delimiter that will work - the code
tests for it explicitly.
So if your .CMU returns
FAX_number!string!name!whatever
it will work.
One thing though - it's probably a good idea to avoid having any @'s in
the string, as ALL-IN-1 tests for the presence of an @ before it does
the rest of the testing. Seeing the @, it will assume that the message
is to go remote and try to use the sender to send it via message
router!
Dave.
|
1142.5 | And the latest book does in fact say so | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Fri Jul 31 1992 17:24 | 9 |
| Well, it turns out that this has been corrected in the v3.0 Guide. It
now says that you can only use a _, and the explanation of how it all
works has been re-written and is much clearer (I can safely say this,
since I wrote the original explanation back in about 1983!)
Dave.
(Now the real question - who _is_ BURNETT anyway? Small prize for the
correct answer - by mail please; don't clutter up this conference!)
|