| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name
 | Date | Lines | 
|---|
| 1142.1 |  | IOSG::WDAVIES | There can only be one ALL-IN-1 Mail | Wed Jul 29 1992 16:12 | 4 | 
|  |     No its when it gets sent - either in express mail in the users context,
    or in the postmasters context.
          
    Winton
 | 
| 1142.2 | Under what circumstances ... | TAV02::CHAIM | Semper ubi Sub ubi ..... | Thu Jul 30 1992 10:57 | 11 | 
|  | Re .1
I am aware that a .COM file is executed at Send time. My question is under what
circumstances will this execute. If during the execution at Create time the
.CMU file changed the address from FAX to FAX!12345++@FAXMBX, will FAX.COM be
executed at Send time?
Thanks,
Cb.
 | 
| 1142.3 | Well, there may be a problem here . . . | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Thu Jul 30 1992 15:32 | 11 | 
|  |     Well, it's supposed to be. As long as there is a suitable delimiter
    between the part of the address that is an entry in the local profile
    file (FAX in your example) and the rest of the string. I think the
    guide uses _
    
    However, this seems to have got broken in v3.0. I'm surprised that we
    haven't had any bug reports about this.
    
    I'll do some more checking later (may have to be tomorrow).
    
    Dave.
 | 
| 1142.4 | It does work, but only with underscore | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Fri Jul 31 1992 16:03 | 22 | 
|  |     Well, I've looked at this again.
    
    The answer is that the Guide is slightly mis-leading.
    
    It gives _ as an example of the delimiter between the part of the
    address that can be looked up in the profile and the rest of the
    string. In fact, _ is the ONLY delimiter that will work - the code
    tests for it explicitly.
    
    So if your .CMU returns
    
    FAX_number!string!name!whatever
    
    it will work.
    
    One thing though - it's probably a good idea to avoid having any @'s in
    the string, as ALL-IN-1 tests for the presence of an @ before it does
    the rest of the testing. Seeing the @, it will assume that the message
    is to go remote and try to use the sender to send it via message
    router!
    
    Dave.
 | 
| 1142.5 | And the latest book does in fact say so | IOSG::SHOVE | Dave Shove -- REO-D/3C | Fri Jul 31 1992 16:24 | 9 | 
|  |     Well, it turns out that this has been corrected in the v3.0 Guide. It
    now says that you can only use a _, and the explanation of how it all
    works has been re-written and is much clearer (I can safely say this,
    since I wrote the original explanation back in about 1983!)
    
    Dave.
    
    (Now the real question - who _is_ BURNETT anyway? Small prize for the
    correct answer - by mail please; don't clutter up this conference!)
 |