[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

1141.0. "VMSMAIL in MAIDES and SECOND_CLASS Priority" by PCOLA::HAM () Wed Jul 29 1992 05:10

    Q.  I have users with MAIDES profile entry set to VMSMAIL.  User
    encounters a problem answering a message with second class priority. 
    The answer from VMSMAIL goes to the ALL-IN-1 VMS account, rather than
    to the account that sent the message.  If I change the MAIDES to
    ALL-IN-1 and set auto-forwarding to the VMS account, answering second
    class priority mail is successfully sent to the original sender.
    
    Is this an error within ALL-IN-1, or is this the way it's suppose to
    happen?  Is this due to the fact that the Sender batch job runs under
    an ALL-IN-1 process?  Why does the answer work correctly, if MAIDES
    reflects ALL-IN-1 and auto-forwarding is set to VMS?
    
    Thanks...
    
    Bill
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1141.1Unavoidable BehaviourBUFFER::VICKERSand thanks for all the fishWed Jul 29 1992 14:3318
    This behaviour has been discussed in this conference within the past
    few months so you might be able to find more information about it by
    doing a DIRECTORY of the topics.

    You have corrected determined the root of the cause of the behaviour
    being that the Sender is running in the context of the ALL-IN-1 account.
    Mail which goes directly to VMSmail does so by invoking the MAIL DCL
    command in the subprocess.  There is no good choice for handling Second
    Class mail in this situation other than the one you have taken.

    My guess is that you actually used MRGATE to provide the bridge between
    ALL-IN-1 and VMSmail.  By doing so, the actual ALL-IN-1 address string
    is maintained so that the answered mail can find the proper sender. 
    Had you forwarded the mail via the "_node::account" format you would
    have obtained the same undesired behaviour.

    Have fun,
    don
1141.2A pointerAIMTEC::WICKS_ADEC Mail Works for ME sometimesWed Jul 29 1992 19:526
    Note 2003 in the archived version of this conference is one of many
    that describe this feature.
    
    Regards,
    
    Andrew.D.Wicks