T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1028.1 | My advice is to go back | ACUMEN::VICKERS | Rearranging the DEChairs | Tue Jul 14 1992 00:05 | 22 |
| I can't believe that no one has replied. Hopefully, you have resolved
the self inflicted problems at the customer site by now.
Doing a CONVERT/MERGE on the PENDING file is almost certainly a bad
idea as the records have special internal structures including
continuation markers.
I fear that there is really no way to get the PENDING the file to be
exactly correct. The only way would be to perform record level surgery
which would be very difficult and error prone.
The other files to be examined for damage would be the profile,
attendee, and meeting files.
My advice would be to fall back to the previous versions of the files
in OA$DATA and to issue an apology and give career counseling to the
party responsible for the restore. Trying to cover the error is almost
certainly going to be more likely to result in further damage as well as
pain.
Sorry,
don
|
1028.2 | Restore pending, then get pending,... | SHALOT::WARFORD | Richard Warford @OPA DTN 393-7495 | Tue Jul 14 1992 00:49 | 7 |
| Best method, is to write a little script that will newdir to each
account and do a get pending. Then restore the old pending.dat, run the
script. Restore the current pending.dat and continue runnging. The
only potential problem is in defered messages. So take a look at those
and see if you really have a problem with it.
Rick
|
1028.3 | More info | IOSG::WDAVIES | There can only be one ALL-IN-1 Mail | Tue Jul 14 1992 18:23 | 22 |
| I've been in the Pending DSAB code recently, and even I was unsure how
to advise you - but my feeling is NO. As don says, there can be
continuation records - and merge can't take account of these at all.
Effectively the pending file is a series of duplicate key entries.
KEY is there more
"MAIL WDAVIES""Y".... DATA ... DATA ..... DATA
cont record 1
"MAIL WDAVIES""1".... DATA ... DATA ..... DATA
Now imagine if you have 1 record in each for "MAIL WDAVIES"
Both have continuation set to NO...
Rick's solution is the neatest - as the cab$pending dsab will not allow
you to directly manipulate entries.
_HOWEVER_ It does NOT clear the SENDER QUEUE - to do this run teh
sender,and then examine the queue, and mark out the ones which were not
cleared.
Winton
|
1028.4 | Discussed in old conference | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | DEC Mail Works for ME sometimes | Tue Jul 14 1992 18:40 | 17 |
|
Note 3094 in the old conference has a procedure by Terry Porter for
doing this (so it must work) - here are the steps that refer to PENDING
for your info:
3. Make sure the sender and fetcher queues in PENDING are empty. Blow
away the sender and fetcher queues from one of the two systems. If you
have deferred mail on both systems then you have to chose which to
destroy.
9. Copy across and merge OA$DATA:PENDING.DAT
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
1028.5 | | IOSG::WDAVIES | There can only be one ALL-IN-1 Mail | Tue Jul 14 1992 19:55 | 4 |
| Andy, not questioning your superior information - but does this really
work with users who have large inboxes ????
Winton
|