T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
972.1 | No kit locations please, now over to you Paul... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Wed Jul 01 1992 18:42 | 8 |
| I've removed the kit location from .0 at the suggestion of a fellow
moderator, who will be replying to this note shortly.
Please don't post the kit locations in this conference!
Thanks,
Graham
|
972.2 | You need to pull a new PAK from VTX | IOSG::TALLETT | Arranging bits for a living... | Wed Jul 01 1992 19:13 | 25 |
|
Thanks Graham. No big deal about the kit locations, its just
that the whole system you used to get the location has been
set up to track who is pulling kits, and you bypass that by
posting kit locations.
Now on to your problem. The book states that your V2.4 license
is valid for V3.0. Well that is because the book is written for
customers and not DEC internal. For internal sites (I assume you
must be internal if you're using the network kit) the PAKs in
VTX have release date one year after you request the PAK. That
means you can install and use any version of the software released
before that date. (Not to be confused with license expiry dates).
Anyway, to cut a long story short, you, as an internal user, need
to pull a new PAK from VTX. The PAK you have is out of date.
A fresh PAK will allow you to install and run V3.0 as long as you
like (but you might need to pull another license to install/use any
possible future releases).
Customers don't have to do this, their PAKs don't have release
dates, so the book is correct.
Regards,
Paul
|
972.3 | no go | DEVOTN::NTTDA::MENARD | | Thu Jul 02 1992 17:30 | 7 |
| I'm still getting the same error, even after following the instructions in .2.
The log file for the installation can be copied from SISDA::SISDA$PUBLIC:A130.LOG
if you want to see it.
Could something else be causing the problem?
RAM
|
972.4 | Possibly an old SUP. | BRUNEL::JACK | | Thu Jul 02 1992 18:11 | 28 |
| If you are using a Software Update Pak, which was supplied with V2.4
Kits and it has a release date of 01-JAN-1991 then the V3.0 PC option will
give you this -INVALID date message.
This will also apply to our customers who have installed the V2.4 SUP.
What you need to do is disable the SUP licence
$LICENSE DISABLE/AUTHORISATION= <number> ALLIN1
Then install your "proper" PAK
$@SYS$UPDATE:VMSLICENSE
When the command asks if you wish to load this PAK, say NO.
Then unload the PAK you previously DISABLED
$ LICENSE UNLOAD ALLIN1
Then load your "proper" PAK
$ LICENSE LOAD ALLIN1
Hope this helps.
cheers
Jack C.
Bristol SPS
ps. and it's allowed me to say in my own dialect, ALLIN1 !
|
972.5 | What do your licenses look like | IOSG::TALLETT | Arranging bits for a living... | Thu Jul 02 1992 20:23 | 20 |
|
I would recommend doing LICENSE DELETE instead of DISABLE if
your LICENSE command understands DELETE (VMS V5.5 or LMF V1.1 kit
installed).
Your log doesn't show much except that you have both an old
capacity license ALLIN1 and an old personal license ALLIN1-PERSONAL
loaded. If you have more problems please either post the results
of, or if it is too long, provide pointers to the results of, the
following commands:
$ SHOW LICENSE ALLIN1*
$ LICENSE LIST ALLIN1*/FULL/OUTPUT=X.TMP
$ TYPE X.TMP
(Notice for notes police, this will be okay because the checksums
will not be listed so no-one can copy the PAKs)
Regards,
Paul
|
972.6 | Similar problem circumvented | BRUMMY::BIRGP1::LONERGAN | "Out through the window" | Fri Jul 03 1992 15:05 | 22 |
|
We had the same problem as reported in note .0 and made several
attempts to load in new licences. It didn't matter how many times I
ran sys$update:Vmslicense to remove the ALL-IN-1 V2.4 licence(it had
some real good statuses(sp) such as even extinct associated with it) or
when I tried all the various options from DCL, whenever I did a $Show
License ALL-IN-1, it pointed to the old one. So we decided to go for a
new LMF database file, loaded in the new ALL-IN-1 license and rebooted
the system. Sho Lice ALL-IN-1 now recognises the correct pak and more
importantly, the upgrade does too. Luckily our IS have a magic little
command file to allow us to remove those offending licences, we're not
running VMS 5.5 yet.
Now the kit we have here is not a network kit and the license is a
temporary one from the CSC. Its possible that the PAKS from VTX would
worked if we had used the above procedure. Quite possibly this will
affect other inhouse upgrades so be warned...I just hope Paul is
correct in thinking it wont affect our "external" customers.
Regards,
Se�n
|
972.7 | LICENSE DELETE | IOSG::TALLETT | Arranging bits for a living... | Fri Jul 03 1992 19:09 | 30 |
|
Yes, several people seem to have a problem with getting rid of
those pesky licenses. I don't like running Vmslicense.com because
I don't know what it does. It sounds like it doesn't LICENSE UNLOAD
any loaded licenses which would cause the problem you are having.
> Luckily our IS have a magic little
> command file to allow us to remove those offending licences, we're not
> running VMS 5.5 yet.
LMF engineering claim that these "little command files" have been
known to corrupt the LMF database. They recommend you get hold of
the LMF011.% kit and install it on pre-V5.5 systems. This gives
you the LICENSE DELETE command, among other things. The
installation takes about 5 minutes.
> I just hope Paul is
> correct in thinking it wont affect our "external" customers.
So do I! :-) There was a long discussion about this date thing, and
we decided it should be implemented as per the SQM/LMF rules which
is why the date changed. Any licenses which are now invalidated
should have been sold under special conditions (we don't normally
sell these "restricted" licenses) and per LMF rules they should
not allow you to run a newer version. I just do as I'm told... :-)
By the way, what's a SUP?
Regards,
Paul
|
972.8 | Get rid of all the old ones first | PRESS1::HOWARD | Our business is computers not money | Fri Jul 10 1992 18:38 | 38 |
| This issue has been inactive for a while, but I thought I would throw
in my 2�. I heartily recommend installing V1.1 of LMF to get the
delete command, but even if you don't, this is what works for me:
$ LICENSE UNLOAD ALLIN1
$ LICENSE LIST ALLIN1/FULL
If only one shows up, use:
$ LICENSE DISABLE ALLIN1
Otherwise use
$ LICENSE DISABLE ALLIN1/AUTH=first_number_from_screen
$ LICENSE DISABLE ALLIN1/AUTH=second_number_from_screen
With LMF V1.1, you can then do:
$ LICENSE DELETE ALLIN1/AUTH=first_number_from_screen
$ LICENSE DELETE ALLIN1/AUTH=second_number_from_screen
In either case use:
$ LICENSE LIST ALLIN1/FULL
You should then see one or more licenses with a status of DISABLED or
no licenses at all if you used V1.1
Then, finally
$ @PAK.COM ! The new one you got from VTX
This will load the new one.
Unfortunately, LMF loads the first one that it sees, and has no idea
that this product release business is a problem, so it just goes ahead
loads your bad one if you don't disable or delete it first.
All this holds true for all products; it's not just ALL-IN-1.
Ben
|