Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Hi, I couldn't find any information with a few quick searches, so pardon me if I missed it. Is there any reason why the II (index inbox) option lists the _MODIFIED_ date under 'Received'? Shouldn't it be POSTED instead? If it's a bug, I'll [have the customer] SPR it... > Index of Inbox > (Selections: 0) (New messages: 1 ) > > No. Folder Title Sender Received > > > 1 INBOX just more testing ALL-IN-1 System 02-Jun-1992 ^^^ should be POSTED date! Cheers, Dan'l
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
788.1 | You knew this really | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Liverpool win the F.A Cup again! | Wed Jun 03 1992 00:50 | 17 |
Dan'l Shame on you (:==:) - this was in this very notes file about a week ago. It's done this way for "performance reasons" MODIFIED is in the DOCDB whereas POSTED is in the DAF which takes quite a bit longer to get at. Someone did once post a QAR about the labelling of the field being wrong but it got a "Thank for for your SPR" answer. Of course you can customise it (using CM of course) and then your customer can take longer coffee breaks !! Regards, Andrew.D.Wicks |