Title: | *OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference |
Notice: | Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1 |
Moderator: | IOSG::PYE |
Created: | Thu Jan 30 1992 |
Last Modified: | Tue Jan 23 1996 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 4343 |
Total number of notes: | 18308 |
Excuse me if this has been covered. I didn't see it. Customer's work statement includes 2.4D patch. Work has not been done and 3.0 has arrived. 1) At a given single-node, single-language, slightly customized system, how much more work will be involved in 2.4-->3.0 instead of 2.4D patch? 2) Are there compatibility issues with 3.0 and Lotus 1-2-3 or WordPerfect/OA? I've taken the three-day Technical Update, which only barely covers installation, and I've worked with ALL-IN-1 since 1.4. I believe the VAX is running VMS 5.4. Thanks for any help. Bruce Rhodewalt
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
704.1 | Apples and Oranges | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Liverpool win the F.A Cup again! | Mon May 18 1992 20:30 | 20 |
Bruce, Why would you be choosing between applying a v2.4 patch against upgrading to v3.0. It's like trying to compare apples and oranges. A v2.4 patch fixes some bugs and takes maybe an hour to install but gives you no new functionality. V3.0 takes a long time - say an hour to run pre-check, 12 hours to run the CART and then maybe another 12 hours to do the upgrade but it fixes hundreds of bugs and introduces tons of new functionality. That's your choice or the customers of course 2) Neither WordPerfect nor Lotus have released v3.0 compatible versions yet as discussed recently in other notes in this conference. Regards, Andrew.D.Wicks | |||||
704.2 | Noted | SWAM2::RHODEWALT_BR | Open. Close. Repeat. | Mon May 18 1992 22:27 | 10 |
Got your attention, anyway. The customer is using SFCP, which is incompatible with the new WPS-PLUS. They're ready to go ahead with 3.0, and convert their old shared documents, but the work statement only has my patch time accounted for. I was looking for a significantly larger number, so that this customer could not just "squeeze in" the actual upgrade. You have given me that, sir, and I thank you. Bruce | |||||
704.3 | Oh no it's not | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Liverpool win the F.A Cup again! | Mon May 18 1992 23:36 | 11 |
Bruce, Um why exactly is SFCP incompatible with WPS-PLUS ? sounds like somebody has been fibbing to you. Just checked on my system running SFCP R1.2A and WPS-PLUS v4.x and ALL-IN-1 v2.4 and it works just fine. Regards, Andrew.D.Wicks |