T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
671.1 | A link loop without the loop? ;') | BUFFER::VICKERS | Rearranging the DEChairs | Tue May 12 1992 15:59 | 19 |
| This certainly does sound like very strange behaviour for a common
household appliance (or installation). The HIB process state seems
quite bizarre.
A wild guess would be that there is some file system level problem,
possibly a bad object library or other file used in the link. It would
be good to do an ANAL/RMS on the various object libraries in SYS$SHARE
as well as the ones being used more directly by ALL-IN-1 in its area.
I would suggest that the ANAL/DISK be done on the system disk and other
disks being used for the install to see if there are problems at that
level, as well.
It might be a bit helpful to do a SHOW PROC/CONT on one other terminal
and a SHOW DEV/FIL/NOSYS SYS$SYSDEVICE: on another to observe the
progress of the install.
Hang in there,
don
|
671.2 | DEBUG, DEBUG, DEBUG! | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Liverpool win the F.A Cup again! | Tue May 12 1992 16:58 | 7 |
| Or redo the installation with OPTIONS D
that will tell you what file it is trying to access.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
671.3 | Assuming you don't fill the disc with the resulting logfile... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Tue May 12 1992 17:02 | 0 |
671.4 | VMS bug? | IOSG::TALLETT | Making broccoli | Wed May 20 1992 20:28 | 15 |
|
This reminds me of a bug in SPAWN, something to do with the
protection on a mailbox used by DCL to pass info between the
parent and sub-process. The footprint was a HIB parent in
supervisor mode (don't we just know it) and no subprocess. It
was introduced in a recent VMS version, as the protection on the
mailbox was "corrected". HIB+super state is normal for a parent
spawning a subprocess.
Sorry I can't be more specific, I didn't really understand the
details at the time. You could maybe trawl VMSNOTES, cos that's
where I saw it.
Regards,
Paul
|