[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

443.0. "Patch List for 3.0?" by POBOX::CROWE (I led the pigeons to the flag..) Wed Apr 08 1992 20:30

    Is there available a patch list of what's been fixed in v3.0? 
    Specifically my customers are having problems with a `feature' that
    Atlanta says they are "aware of and have elevated to engineering."
    I know its a known problem, is it fixed in the next release?
    
    The problem is this:  if you reply/answer to an off-node message, your
    name gets added to the CC: list once for every time you reply.  They do
    some goofy mass messaging and replying and this is getting to be a very
    visible problem.  Customers want to know if this is fixed in 3.0?
    
    If nobody here knows, do you know where I can find out?
    
    --  Tracy
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
443.1Workarounds, No FixUTRTSC::SCHOLLAERTHalf Dutch - Half BelgiumThu Apr 09 1992 21:1574
    Tracy,
    
>    Is there available a patch list of what's been fixed in v3.0? 
>    Specifically my customers are having problems with a `feature' that
    
    The release notes contain a list with known problems. 
    
>    The problem is this:  if you reply/answer to an off-node message, your
>    name gets added to the CC: list once for every time you reply.  They do
>    some goofy mass messaging and replying and this is getting to be a very
>    visible problem.  Customers want to know if this is fixed in 3.0?
    
    This problem is not fixed because its not possible to fix 
    with the current mail system. If you want the details,
    read note 2644 of the 2.4 note conference.
    
>    If nobody here knows, do you know where I can find out?
    Contact your CSC. They have access to a problem/solution
    database which contains info about the problem. 
    I think every employee should have access to the tool.
    I know this cost losts of money but it will save lots of money.
    
    By the way. When your customer used the following addressing method,
    you can use the script at the end of my reply to remove
    the user from the CC: list. 
    
    If they use:
    
    		ALL-IN-1 username @ mailboxname @ node 
    


!+
! file		: remove_user_from_cc_list.scp
! created 	: 6 feb 1992
! author  	: Jan Schollaert
!-
!+
! Get remote address of local user
!-
     GET #USER = OA$USER "@" LOG$OA$MTI_MAILBX "@" LOG$OA$MTI_MR_NODE
!+
! Remove user from CC list
!-
     FOR CAB$ATTRIBUTES:"CC" WITH .VALUE <=> #USER DO -
     CAB DELETE_ATTRIBUTE OA$CURMES, "CC", .VALUE

    .EXIT
!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
!+
! COPYRIGHT (c) 1988,1989,1990 BY
! DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, MAYNARD, MASSACHUSETTS.
! ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
! 
! THIS SOFTWARE IS FURNISHED UNDER A LICENSE AND MAY BE USED AND COPIED
! ONLY  IN  ACCORDANCE  OF  THE  TERMS  OF  SUCH  LICENSE  AND WITH THE
! INCLUSION OF THE ABOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICE. THIS SOFTWARE OR  ANY  OTHER
! COPIES THEREOF MAY NOT BE PROVIDED OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILABLE TO ANY
! OTHER PERSON.  NO TITLE TO AND  OWNERSHIP OF THE  SOFTWARE IS  HEREBY
! TRANSFERRED.
! 
! THE INFORMATION IN THIS SOFTWARE IS  SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE
! AND  SHOULD  NOT  BE  CONSTRUED  AS A COMMITMENT BY DIGITAL EQUIPMENT
! CORPORATION.
! 
! DIGITAL ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE USE  OR  RELIABILITY OF ITS
! SOFTWARE ON EQUIPMENT WHICH IS NOT SUPPLIED BY DIGITAL.
!-


    
    
    
    
    
443.2I'll take it!POBOX::CROWEI led the pigeons to the flag..Fri Apr 10 1992 18:348
    .1,
    
    Many thanks, the news of no fix won't make them happy but the script
    you supplied may alleviate the problem.
    
    Thanks,
    
    --  Tracy