[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

380.0. "SVC function in DT menu of version 2.3" by VFOVAX::TRAUTWEIN () Tue Mar 31 1992 20:46

    There is a problem with the SVC functionality from the DT menu in 
    ALL-IN-1 version 2.3. When trying to save a binary document without
    conversion to a VMS file the VMS file only gets a single ascii string
    in it that states "Text line unsupported by terminal type." However,
    dumping the file that ALL-IN-1 has the actual document in reveals the
    binary data is in the document. I obtained the file and directory that
    ALL-IN-1 is using by using the FULLDB command. The DSAB is foreign. 
    The type is DOCUMENT. 
    
    This same functionality works in ALL-IN-1 2.4. Also the Atlanta hotline
    has a machine with ALL-IN-1 2.3 in which they repeated the test and it 
    worked for them. They stated that their machine probably has all the 
    patches for version 2.3. Looking in notes there were apparently a
    series of patches for version 2.3. These are 501 to 536. Can anyone
    confirm that one of the patches fixed this particular problem. If so,
    we need to obtain the patch that corrects this problem. 
    
    Upgrading to version 2.4 is not a solution. This functionality was
    promissed to customers to work with version 2.3 without upgrade. 
    If a patch is not the solution, what else is configurable that may 
    provide the solution? The customer experiencing problems at present
    says that they have not customized the document transfer menu. Is there
    something that they must customize for SVC to work?
    
    Thank You in advance for the help,
    
    Ralph
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
380.1It's hard to remember that far backHYPERS::VICKERSIf it helps a customer, DO ITTue Mar 31 1992 22:2217
    I would assume that there are good business reasons for the customer to
    remain on ALL-IN-1 V2.3 rather than moving to software which provides
    the improved operations.

    It most certainly sounds as if the SVC option is doing a convert on the
    customer's system.  You might want to have them do a trace of the
    SCRIPT and SYMBOL activities when they do a SVC.  I don't believe that
    V2.3 had the /FILE qualifier on the COPY function so I am not sure how
    the conversion was avoided in V2.3.

    One approach would be to use the DCL copy command to make the copy. 
    You could customize the SVC code to do so if you must.

    I am sure that others will be able to give better answers.

    Hang in there,
    don
380.2Don't need DCL in V2.3 - but takes two or more stepsSHALOT::WARFORDRichard Warford @OPA DTN 393-7495Wed Apr 01 1992 04:565
    Instead of using the DCL copy, you could do an ALL-IN-1 COPY function
     making sure the extensions remained the same, then do a RENAME
    function. Same result, but no DCL subprocess required.
    
    Rick
380.3Could you supply me the steps to take?VFOVAX::TRAUTWEINWed Apr 01 1992 17:239
    I have not had the pleasure of customizing a command such as SVC
    before. Can you give me the cookbook list of steps I would take to 
    customize SVC so that when that command is invoked it does the 
    ALL-IN-1 copy and rename as you described. 
    
    Thank you,
    
    Ralph
    
380.4Nine steps to a better life (or script)HYPERS::VICKERSIf it helps a customer, DO ITThu Apr 02 1992 08:1938
    In doing some research on a V2.4 system I see that the SVC option there
    uses the DCL COPY to make the copy.  I am guessing that this MAY be the
    case in V2.3 as well.

    You may wish to examine the OA$DO:DXSV.SCP script to see.  Take a look at
    the code after step 6 below and see what happens right after the SVC_COPY
    option.

    You might also wish to try the SVC option with SCRIPT and SYMBOL tracing
    set to the log file.  Take a look at that and see what is going on.

    1. Go to the CM menu and use the ADE option to Access the Base Elements.
    2. Use the SEL option to select the DXSV script by placing that in the
       Name field and DO in the Type field.  Mash RETURN.
    3. Use CO to copy it to the development area.
    4. EXIT back to the CM menu.
    5. Use E to edit it.
    6. Find the label called SVC_COPY and add the code between the !!'s below: 
       (Note that the first !! comments out the existing V2.4 code)

    .LABEL SVC_COPY
    !!      GET OA$DCL = "COPY " #DX_SRC " " #VMSFILE
            GET #TMP_FILE = OA$DIR:"*.*;".DEV[#VMSFILE] -
                    OA$DIR:"*.*;".DIR[#VMSFILE] -
                    "TMP_FILE" OA$DIR:"*.*;".TYPE[#DX_SRC]
            COPY #DX_SRC #TMP_FILE
            RENAME #TMP_FILE #VMSFILE
    !!
            GET #DX_STS = OA$STATUS
            .GOTO SVC_EXIT

    7. Test that the new script works by using the MS DVF option.
    8. Once you are happy with it then use the MLA option to move it live.
    9. You will then have to use the SM M CSZ PME ML CCM options (with the
       proper pauses in between) to make the sucker live. 

    Hope this helps,
    don
380.5COPY/FILE is new for V3.0IOSG::MARCHANTOnly parrots succeedSun Apr 05 1992 22:158
    Yes, the `/FILE' qualifier on the COPY command (and APPEND too) is new
    for V3.0.

    Both V2.3 & V2.4 (& earlier? - before my time!) use a DCL copy for the
    SVC option.

    Cheers,
        Paul.