T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
202.1 | The DECUS PSS might help | BUFFER::VICKERS | Winners take action not keep score | Mon Mar 09 1992 22:43 | 25 |
| The user differences document to which I placed a pointer during
'Expert' Training is a good start.
Your customer might be well served to attend the Pre Symposium Seminar
which will be given in Atlanta on 3-May-1992 which covers "Upgrading to
ALL-IN-1 V3.0". Your customer will then be able to attend the
remainder of the DECUS symposium well armed to ask all sorts of great
questions to prepare themselves for the upgrade.
Below is the agenda of the PSS:
Introduction to the PSS
Attendee introduction and goals
Overview of ALL-IN-1 V3.0
Writing your installation checklist
Installation Procedure Operations
Conflict and Reporting Tool (CART)
Upgrading application packages
Managing Customization Management
Changes in managing resources
Migrating from SFCP
Additional topics and questions
Have fun,
don
|
202.2 | Blushing... | IOSG::PYE | Graham - ALL-IN-1 Sorcerer's Apprentice | Wed Mar 11 1992 09:38 | 18 |
| After your compliment in .0, I had to reply really!
I think I said run the FCVR or at least PT before upgrading, especially
if you're doing an SFCP migrate.
We've field tested the SFCP migration at a site whose use of SFCP makes
your customers look like a test system! They had several hundred SFCP
cabinets I think!
Once your customer gets the kit, which should be soon now, they should
read the books straight away. Perhaps you could obtain an earlier copy
to let them have a look at?
As far as SFCP cabinets belonging to departed users, that shouldn't
matter as long as the owning accounts still exist. Once you've gone to
V3.0, you could move the corresponding into a more sensible place.
Graham
|
202.3 | Correcting the Expert | AIMTEC::WICKS_A | Vote Bill'n'Opus for a weirder USA | Wed Mar 11 1992 16:52 | 20 |
| Re .2
Well excusing GAP's use of old terminology (FCVR was renamed to TRU and
TRM some years ago) i'd just like to point out that the running of
PT or TRU before migrating SFCP is *RECOMMENDED* but NOT *MANDATORY*
as implied in the Installation Guide - the correction is in the
Release Notes.
There are many valid reasons that customers may not or cannot perform
either or both before the upgrade and certainly on the guess that the
site that GAP is referring to is Denver VAMC then we'd still be trying
to upgrade them now if that was true!
They've been running DIAMOND for 4 months now and have still to have a
successful TRU/TRM run - but of course they are a 'worst case' scenario.
Regards,
Andrew.D.Wicks
|
202.4 | Is this right? | KCOHUB::KCPCXX::SCHELL | Insufficient virtual memory... | Fri Mar 13 1992 17:50 | 21 |
| Thanks for the thoughts...
Check me on this; see if I've got it right.
I have two Shared File Cabinets: "Projects" and "Ideas"
Bill and Lucy have access to both of them.
I upgrade to V3.0
Bill and Lucy can now access a DRAWER named "Projects", and a DRAWER
named "Ideas", both of which are "simple" shared drawers.
Is that correct?
Who "owns" the Shared Drawers?
Thanks again
John
|
202.5 | The original owner stills owns the files | BUFFER::VICKERS | Winners take action not keep score | Fri Mar 13 1992 18:53 | 25 |
| If Bill and Lucy are currently using SFCP to access two shared cabinets
then they are using something like
[PROJECTS]folder-name and [IDEAS]folder-name
as the folder name.
After the SFCP upgrade script has been executed then the
[PROJECTS]MAIN and [IDEAS]MAIN
drawers will be accessible to all those users who had access to the
shared file cabinets prior to the upgrade.
The users can add these drawers to their file cabinets using the Add
Drawer (ADR) on the Drawer Management (DRM) menu under the File Cabinet
(FC) menu. The users can give the drawers any name they wish.
The files in the shared drawers are owned by the VMS account which was
used to contain the SFCP directories prior to upgrading to V3. As
Graham said in an prior reply, you can change the ownership if
required.
Have fun,
don
|