[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference iosg::all-in-1_v30

Title:*OLD* ALL-IN-1 (tm) Support Conference
Notice:Closed - See Note 4331.l to move to IOSG::ALL-IN-1
Moderator:IOSG::PYE
Created:Thu Jan 30 1992
Last Modified:Tue Jan 23 1996
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4343
Total number of notes:18308

168.0. "TM: How to extend the Event description field?" by SUBWAY::SULLIVAN () Wed Mar 04 1992 16:47

    My customer is running ALL-IN-1 2.4 with WordPerfect 5.1
    
    They have requested that  the TM EV description field be extended..
    
    Ideally, they would like to be able to attach a small document to an
    event...i.e. a set of directions, phone contacts etc.
    
    Has anyone done anything like this before?
    
    If not is it just a matter of me expanding the description field?
    
    Thanks
    Ruth
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
168.1Bad news... and good newsSHALOT::NICODEMWho told you I'm paranoid???Wed Mar 04 1992 18:4027
	Seems like we have two questions here:

�    They have requested that  the TM EV description field be extended..

	If you're referring to the "Purpose" field (DESC), then the answer is
"Don't touch it!"  The Calendar data sets (CAL$CALENDAR, CAL$MEETING, and
CAL$ATTENDEE) are all bound closely together; trying to make a "simple" modifi-
cation to one isn't as simple as it sounds.  It's not just a matter of changing
a field on an entry form somewhere.  These DSABs are defined within the BLISS
code.

	However...

�    Ideally, they would like to be able to attach a small document to an
�    event...i.e. a set of directions, phone contacts etc.

	This *is* your lucky day!  As a matter of fact, we do have just such an
application, written as a customized TM solution.  This solution is available
through our office here in Charlotte, and the person you should contact is
Barb SHALOT::PEACOCK (DTN 393-7573).

	The application you would want to refer to is known as "Attaching
Related Documents", and is becoming a somewhat standard TM enhancement (ref:
a similar capability within the old SES application).  BTW, the application has
already been upgraded for V3.0, and is currently in final testing...  8^)

	F
168.2Just curiousAIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_DWhy would CSC specialists need training?Wed Mar 04 1992 19:218
        Hi Frank,
        
        Has this been tested with WordPerfect integrated on the system? 
        This integration chokes on the 80 character dash when you try to
        add a comment to the event.  The customer appears to have seen no
        way around this and asked for the data set to be extended.
        
        Dave Zaniewski
168.3Not the same thingSHALOT::NICODEMWho told you I'm paranoid???Fri Mar 06 1992 13:0717
�        This integration chokes on the 80 character dash when you try to
�        add a comment to the event.

	Again, I'll say that I think we've got two different topics here.  The
integration I was mentioning in .1 (and which addressed the specific problem in
.0 of being able to attach "small documents" to an event) does *not* use the
DESC field.  It uses the FILLER field as a pointer to *another* (i.e., related)
document, which can then be as short or as long as you wish to make it.  This
related document could be directions to the meeting, speaker notes, an agenda,
or anything else you want.

	I'll still suggest that extending a field in the calendar DSAB is *not*
the kind of task a user wants to undertake.  (In fact, that's exactly why some
"special" DSABs have been written to extend things like the ATTENDEE record
*in another file*, rather than in the ATTENDEE record itself; right, Ben???)

	F
168.4Wasn't the "dashed" problem fixed?SEWNSO::PEACOCKBack in the saddle againMon Mar 09 1992 14:458
Hi Dave!

I thought that the problem with WordPerfect and the dashes was fixed when
the code was changed to display a symbol (OA$_TM_DAHED_LINE).  If the customer
has WordPerfect, I think they are supposed to change the value of symbol
in OAMESS.   Is this still a problem?

Barb
168.5Possible, but unknownAIMTEC::ZANIEWSKI_DWhy would CSC specialists need training?Tue Mar 10 1992 13:138
        Hi Barb,
        
        At the last time somebody checked for me, the only place that
        symbol was used was in a couple of CM modules (V2.4 unpatched).
        If the TM and MAIL code was changed in a V2.4 patch, then the
        problem may be gone.
        
        Dave Zaniewski