[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | DECWINDOWS 26-JAN-89 to 29-NOV-90 |
Notice: | See 1639.0 for VMS V5.3 kit; 2043.0 for 5.4 IFT kit |
Moderator: | STAR::VATNE |
|
Created: | Mon Oct 30 1989 |
Last Modified: | Mon Dec 31 1990 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 3726 |
Total number of notes: | 19516 |
3662.0. "probl. : security and remote displ. on local node" by MUNICH::BENDER (two beer or not two beer...) Wed Nov 14 1990 11:15
Hi,
try the following :
- login on a vms decwindows system as user A,
- customize security : allow access for localnode, user B, transport DECNET
(or LOCAL),
- create a decterm, do a set host 0 and login as user B,
- type set display/create[/trans=local][/node=localnode]
- start a decwindows application
Probably you will get one of the two error messages :
1. use transport LOCAL in customize security and set display/create :
XIO: unable to open connection _WSA11:
after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 events remaining.
%XLIB-F-IOERROR, xlib io error
-DECW-E-CNXABORT, connection aborted
2. use transport DECNET in customize security and set display/create
Xlib: connection to "0::0.0" refused by server
Xlib: Client is not authorized to access server
X Toolkit Error: Can't Open display
%DWT-F-DWTABORT, xtoolkit fatal error
This two error messages are generated with or without use of /node=localnode
in the set display command
But...
if you use 0 as nodename in customize security, everything works fine !!
Could someone out there give me an explanation for this behaviour ?
Thanks a lot,
-Andreas
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
3662.1 | Current restriction | STAR::VATNE | Peter Vatne, VMS Development | Wed Nov 14 1990 11:55 | 4 |
| There is an undocumented restriction that the node name must be '0'
for local connections.
I suggest you QAR this problem so I don't forget to fix it.
|
3662.2 | DECNET connection ? | MUNICH::BENDER | two beer or not two beer... | Thu Nov 15 1990 05:01 | 5 |
| Thanks for your reply.
But what about the decnet connection ? Are there some more
restrictions ?
Thanks, -Andreas
|
3662.3 | Tricky definition of local | STAR::VATNE | Peter Vatne, VMS Development | Thu Nov 15 1990 13:43 | 6 |
| Um, in this case a 'local' connection is a connection from a client
to a server on the same node, without regards to the transport type.
Unfortunately, we have overloaded the term 'local'. The LOCAL
transport probably should have been named something like 'Shared
Memory', but we're stuck with the current name.
|
3662.4 | I've got it, Thanks! | MUNICH::BENDER | two beer or not two beer... | Fri Nov 16 1990 02:52 | 1 |
|
|