[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference bulova::decw_jan-89_to_nov-90

Title:DECWINDOWS 26-JAN-89 to 29-NOV-90
Notice:See 1639.0 for VMS V5.3 kit; 2043.0 for 5.4 IFT kit
Moderator:STAR::VATNE
Created:Mon Oct 30 1989
Last Modified:Mon Dec 31 1990
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:3726
Total number of notes:19516

3294.0. "DECWINDOWS V3.0/MOTIF QUESTIONS" by HAACK::GUEST () Fri Aug 31 1990 18:27

    I would greatly appreciate it if someone could answer the following
    questions for me or give me pointers for obtaining them:
    
    1. What is the schedule for decwindows v3.0?
    
    2. In the meantime, how much would I burn myself by recommending the
       use of osf/motif v1.1 now as opposed to waiting for decwindows v3.0
       (regarding future potential incompatibilities)?
    
    3. Although uil seems to be a part of osf/motif, is there any
       uncertainty about it being a part of the osf standard (I hear that
       the members of osf have yet to vote on including it!)?
    
    I apologize if these questions have been answered elsewhere - a title
    and keyword search did not prove to be very fruitful.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3294.1Some answers...FUEL::grahamThe revolution will be televisedFri Aug 31 1990 19:1320
> 1. What is the schedule for decwindows v3.0?

I don't know the exact date but it is believed to be around November/
December.

>    2. In the meantime, how much would I burn myself by recommending the
>       use of osf/motif v1.1 now as opposed to waiting for decwindows v3.0
>       (regarding future potential incompatibilities)?

Last I heard, DECwindows V3.0 will not be bundled with Motif V1.1.

>    3. Although uil seems to be a part of osf/motif, is there any
>       uncertainty about it being a part of the osf standard (I hear that
>       the members of osf have yet to vote on including it!)?

UIL is now officially part of the OSF/Motif AES standard.

Kris


3294.2clarificationRAMBOX::JAIDKAFri Aug 31 1990 19:4114
>    2. In the meantime, how much would I burn myself by recommending the
>       use of osf/motif v1.1 now as opposed to waiting for decwindows v3.0
>       (regarding future potential incompatibilities)?
    
>>   Last I heard, DECwindows v3.0 will not be bundled with Motif v1.1
    
    I am sorry, I need to rephrase my question. My understanding is that we
    will be shipping osf/motif until we release the decwindows toolkit. Will an
    application designed using the osf/motif toolkit have any problems
    running under the decwindows toolkit? Also, since the decwindows
    toolkit will presumably (?) have DEC extensions, will there be any
    documentation on how to write portable code??
    
    Thanks. 
3294.3What I have heard..SUBWAY::GRAHAMThe revolution will be televisedSat Sep 01 1990 01:2411
    
    >I am sorry, I need to rephrase my question. My understanding is
    >that we will be shipping osf/motif until we release the decwindows toolkit.
    >Will an application designed using the osf/motif toolkit have any problems
    >running under the decwindows toolkit? 
    
    We have been assured several times that OSF/Motif 1.1 code will
    work/compile without problems in any 'DECwindows/Motif' environment.
    Read the Motif conference at SUBWAY::MOTIF for more info.
    
    Kris..
3294.4decwindows v3 will contain osf/motif v1.1STAR::BMATTHEWSTue Sep 04 1990 11:3918
    1. What is the schedule for decwindows v3.0?
    
>	The schedule is for external field test in early december.
>	The decwindows v3 plans can be found at bulova""::decw$public:[v3.plans]

    2. In the meantime, how much would I burn myself by recommending the
       use of osf/motif v1.1 now as opposed to waiting for decwindows v3.0
       (regarding future potential incompatibilities)?
    
>	decwindows v3 will contain osf/motif v1.1.

    3. Although uil seems to be a part of osf/motif, is there any
       uncertainty about it being a part of the osf standard (I hear that
       the members of osf have yet to vote on including it!)?
    
    I apologize if these questions have been answered elsewhere - a title
    and keyword search did not prove to be very fruitful.

3294.5ThanksRAMBOX::JAIDKATue Sep 04 1990 18:173
    Many thanks for your prompt responses. I shall pursue this further in
    the Motif notes conference if I have further questions along these
    lines.