| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1996.1 | VMS and x11r4? | GIDDAY::DRANSFIELD | Mike Dransfield, Sydney RSSG | Wed Jan 17 1990 00:59 | 11 |
| Should ultrix x11r4 applications display on a vms decwindows v2 server?
I have tried this and it doesn't seem to work.
The message I get is cannot connect to display.
(Of course I have tried and can get R3 applications working from the
same machine)
Any clues welcome,
Thanks,
Mike
(also put in a note in MOTIF conference)
|
| 1996.2 | Did you build with DECnet (-DDNETCONN) support? | MIPSBX::thomas | The Code Warrior | Wed Jan 17 1990 18:31 | 0 |
| 1996.3 | config didn't have decnet | GIDDAY::DRANSFIELD | Mike Dransfield, Sydney RSSG | Mon Jan 29 1990 19:44 | 4 |
| re: .2
No, that was the problem.
Thanks,
Mike
|
| 1996.4 | When will we ship it? | OSLACT::OLAV | Do it in parallel! | Fri Feb 23 1990 09:06 | 3 |
| When will we ship X11R4 as a part of DECwindows with VMS? ULTRIX?
Olav
|
| 1996.5 | For futures, contact the product manager | STAR::VATNE | Peter Vatne, VMS Development | Fri Feb 23 1990 14:02 | 5 |
| The product manager for VMS DECwindows is Janis Horn (STAR::HORN).
Contact her for all questions aobut VMS DECwindows futures.
What in X11 R4 do you or your customers need? I'm curious what the
field has heard about R4.
|
| 1996.6 | Shape .. | HKOVC::TERENCE | From Middlesex, UWO | Mon Feb 26 1990 03:44 | 6 |
| I am interested in the shape-extensions.
Does anybody know how to build a X11R4 server under VMS 5.3 DECwindows
V2.0?
-Terry
|
| 1996.7 | | FEGPX::SWEENEY | Patrick Sweeney in Hong Kong | Mon Feb 26 1990 23:06 | 13 |
| The VMS DECwindows server is not based on the sources provided by MIT,
so the effort in porting the "MIT sample server" is substantial.
It's important to mention every so often that the "standard" is the
protocol description and Xlib bindings, and not the sample
implementations servers and Xlib client which MIT distributes, although
customers see no distinction between such offerings from MIT, vendors
should know of them.
Other people have said this before, but "shapes" are no big deal,
as R3 windows can have a background pixmap = None. The real difference
as I see it is how the server associates events with a window.
|
| 1996.8 | No substitute... | KASINO::NEIDECKER | Software Motion Pictures | Wed Mar 07 1990 06:30 | 10 |
| Re. 7:
Background none doesn't cut it something under the window tries
to draw something new (or scrolls...). Shapes are easy to add to a
server though, as windows are really represented by clip regions
internally and MIT just made use of this to allow more than one
rectangle specify the window form.
Re. "what are you looking for":
Shared memory Pixmaps and PutImage. Makes imaging fly...
|
| 1996.9 | Eurofeed | KERNEL::CARLETONL | I'm the Blue Canary in the light switch | Mon Mar 19 1990 06:39 | 6 |
| For those of us poor people in Europe there is a copy in
decuk::/public/X11/R4
...Les...
|