[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference bulova::decw_jan-89_to_nov-90

Title:DECWINDOWS 26-JAN-89 to 29-NOV-90
Notice:See 1639.0 for VMS V5.3 kit; 2043.0 for 5.4 IFT kit
Moderator:STAR::VATNE
Created:Mon Oct 30 1989
Last Modified:Mon Dec 31 1990
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:3726
Total number of notes:19516

1877.0. "3540 & Multiple Cursors???" by HOTAIR::BOYLES (Albuquerque Onsite Presales Support) Fri Dec 08 1989 18:49

	Help!!!

	I have a customer who purchased a 3540, and he is ready to throw it
	out the door.

	The problem is that when DECWindows is brought up it comes up with
	4 cursors, each one stacked upon the other, about an inch apart
	with the top one being the "real" one.

	Now when the system is brought up (and DECW loaded) the error light
	on the graphics board-set comes up with a fault of 0010... which
	indicates a faulty expansion module.  This module was replaced, but
	the result was the same.  The graphics base and output modules were
	also replaced.

	One of the cpu boardsets was also replaced, and MULTIPROCESSING was
	set to 0 (so that it was running in uniprocessor mode)	...yes folks
	this is shotgun mode.

	Finally, the system had the problem under VMS V5.1-1, and also under
	V5.2

	Can anyone give me any ideas on what to look at next?

	Thanks,

	Gary Boyles
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1877.1You have been through the right channels?BLUMON::QUODLINGOooooh, Nice Software....Sat Dec 09 1989 17:288
        You have got the csc involved? The Hardware problem (if it is
        such) has been elevated through the Field Service Action Outage
        mechanisms? That is usually the best way of getting the most
        qualified people involved with the greatest urgency and guarantee
        of responsiveness.
        
        q
        
1877.2RE: .1HOTAIR::BOYLESAlbuquerque Onsite Presales SupportMon Dec 11 1989 15:2021
    RE: .1
    
    The CSC was involved, and they told the customer to upgrade to V5.2
    (which didn't solve the problem).  As far as the "right" channels
    are concerned I guess I'd have to be naive and say that I would
    think that the responsibility lies with the CSC to resolve a problem
    once a custoemr calls in.... since that's what the CSC gets paid for.
    
    Now I got involved in this whole mess because the problems been dragging
    on for about 3 mths and the problem has gone from a (very expensive)
    3540 that doesn't work to a VERY MAD CUSTOMER with a 3540 that doesno't
    work.
    
    I'll talk to anyone who can help me with the problem.
    
    Which CSC supports 3540s anyway?  Atlanta or Color Spr?
    
    Regards,
    
    Gary BOyles
    
1877.3Some answers, more questions...LNKUGL::BOWMANBob Bowman, CSC/CS SPACE TeamMon Dec 11 1989 16:3422
re: .2

As far as I know, CSC/AT supports the *hardware*, CSC/CS supports VMS. We share
responsibility for supporting DECwindows.

Your quite right that it is a CSC responsibility to try to resolve a customer
issue once they call in.

Now if you called CSC/CS on this, part of the issue may be that we have *no*
Firefox here, and so no one has ever touched one, let alone tried to diagnose
a 4 cursor problem. When we don't have the equipment, and are unable to resolve
the issue remotely, we follow the Customer Services escalation procedure, which
is to notify the local office of the issue and request they provide us onsite
support to try and identify a solution. If we can't resolve it by working with
local customer services, then it is escalated to area/country/corporate support.

Questions:

Which CSC(s) have been involved? can you point us to call handling sequence
numbers? Which groups at CSC(s) have been involved? Has a formal escalation to
local Customer Services been done? Have local Customer Services escalated this
issue to Area/Country/Corporate Support?
1877.4CLD gives it visibilityTOOLEY::B_WACKERMon Dec 11 1989 18:128
As Bob said, CSC/CS has no firefox so I susggest you go through 
Atlanta.  If the customer is mad our procedure is to do a local office 
referral so that you know.  Given that you already know, you need to 
put pressure on Atlanta for them to either fix it or pass it on up to 
CSSE, etc. and get engineering involved.  Notes are nice, but if the 
customer's hot it is not a reliable escalation route.

Bruce
1877.5RE: .3 & .4HOTAIR::BOYLESAlbuquerque Onsite Presales SupportTue Dec 12 1989 10:3921
    RE: .3
    
    The problem did go to Colorado Springs.  The call # is C8910102215.
    
    The suggestion given to the customer was to install V5.2 of VMS
    which didn't change anything.
    
    RE: .4
    Don't "you guys"  (i.e. Colo. Sprs. & Atlanta) work together if a
    problem can't be resolved?
    
    Question:
    Local Office Referral.... What is this supposed to do anyway?  With all
    of the "big picture" people running around in local offices you're
    lucky to find someone who can find the switch to turn a system on.
    
    
    Regards,
    
    Gary Boyles
    
1877.6Some answers...LNKUGL::BOWMANBob Bowman, CSC/CS SPACE TeamTue Dec 12 1989 11:1927
I have responded to Gary by mail.

However, I'll take the opportunity to answer some of the questions from .5

> Don't "you guys"  (i.e. Colo. Sprs. & Atlanta) work together if a
>    problem can't be resolved?

Yes, we work together all the time (perhaps not as well as we could at times,
but we try.) In this particular case, we were not even aware that the customer
was continuing to have problems as the customer had never reported back to
us (as far as we can tell from our admin system) that they had attempted to
follow our advice. If the customer had done so, and we realized that V5.2
had not resolved the problem, we most likely would have been in contact
with Atlanta on this.

>    Local Office Referral.... What is this supposed to do anyway?  With all
>    of the "big picture" people running around in local offices you're
>    lucky to find someone who can find the switch to turn a system on.

A local office referral is the process by which Digital Customer Services
supplies a local focus to problems which for various reasons are not resolvable
remotely. Notice, it is the Customer Services folks that respond, not pre-sales,
sales, consulting groups etc. Now we realize that many local Customer Services
groups may not be staffed to handle software issues, and may infact get
additional local Digital organizations involved. The general idea is that the
local Customer Services manager is ultimately responsible for "their/our" 
customer, and the LOR is the mechanism we use to get them involved in the loop.
1877.7Problem Solved !!!HOTAIR::BOYLESAlbuquerque Onsite Presales SupportTue Dec 12 1989 14:0410
    Found the answer to the problem.... thanks Bob and Tom.
    
    Apparently there was a bad board (#L2005-AA).  It was discovered that
    the diagnostics does not detect the bad chip that causes this problem.
    Manufacturing knows about the problem.
    
    Thanks.
    
    Gary Boyles