T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1699.1 | check resource files | STAR::BROUILLETTE | | Mon Nov 13 1989 14:01 | 7 |
|
The only suggestion I have is to check to see if any of the sm.printer
resources exist in a decw$xdefaults.dat or other *sm*.dat file. They
should only exist in decw$sm_general.dat
Are you doing a capture screen or print screen to get the output?
|
1699.2 | | TALLIS::MCAFEE | Steve McAfee | Mon Nov 13 1989 15:29 | 22 |
| The only file with printer definitions is shown below.
I'm trying to do a capture portion of screen. I would do a print
screen, but we don't have a color printer actually on a queue.
Mine is an LJ250 connected to CSA0: on a VSII/GPX.
regards,
steve
-----------------------------------------------------------------
$ search *.dat; print
******************************
STOUT$DUA1:[MCAFEE]DECW$SM_GENERAL.DAT;11
sm.printer.aspect_ratio: 1,1
sm.printer.color: color
sm.printer.filename: sys$login:decw$capture.six
sm.printer.ribbon_saver: positive
sm.printer.storage_format: sixel
sm.printer.file_prompt: 1
sm.printer.rotate_prompt: 1
|
1699.3 | Here too! | BOMBE::MOORE | BaN CaSe_sEnSiTiVe iDeNtIfIeRs! | Mon Nov 20 1989 01:01 | 18 |
| I'm getting the same thing. If I select B&W sixel, the capture
operation produces a sixel file which prints just fine, in black and
white. After changing *only* the Color option, the result is some
PostScript Bitmap Image format, the header looks like this:
%!PS-Adobe-2.0 EPSF-1.2
%%Title: Bitmap Image
%%Creator: VAS V1.1
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 128 186
%%Pages: 1 1
%%EndComments
/DEC_IMG_dict 50 dict def
DEC_IMG_dict begin
/inch {72 mul} def end
%%EndProlog
%%Page: 1 1
|
1699.4 | Maybe somebody closer wants to QAR it :-) | CASEE::CLEOVOULOU | Marios Cleovoulou | Mon Nov 20 1989 07:30 | 7 |
| It's broken for me too.
Is there anybody that this works for?
Regards,
Marios
|
1699.5 | DECWINDOWS-IFT QAR #3771 | TALLIS::MCAFEE | Steve McAfee | Tue Nov 21 1989 11:46 | 1 |
|
|
1699.6 | Already a patch for this one ? | BRSSWS::GALLOY | Albedo=0.39 | Thu Dec 21 1989 11:30 | 5 |
| Is there a patch available somewhere for this problem?
Or should we wait.........the next release ?
Andr�
|
1699.7 | Still broken in 5.3-1 | MUTTON::LAMB | Peter Lamb - FSG Santa Clara | Wed Jan 24 1990 16:55 | 13 |
| Hi,
I just upgraded to 5.3-1 and it is still broken - I guess I probably could
have found that out by checking the QAR database but just thought I would
mention it here for anyone else that is wondering.
Peter
P.S. It wouldn't be nearly as bad (not having it work) if there were some
other workarround (like generating color postscript) is there any news
on when this will be supported from print screen?
|
1699.8 | Can get there with UTOX | BOMBE::MOORE | BaN CaSe_sEnSiTiVe iDeNtIfIeRs! | Wed Jan 24 1990 20:03 | 2 |
| You can capture the screen with UTOX, save it in SIXEL format and print
that file (in color).
|
1699.9 | Patches forthcoming | STAR::ORGOVAN | Vince Orgovan | Wed Jan 24 1990 22:47 | 5 |
| The printscreen function cannot capture color sixels in VMS V5.3
and V5.3-1. A patch, actually 2 patches, that corrects the problem
have been produced and will be included in VMS V5.3-2. We are
working on making the patches available via the CSC for V5.3 and
V5.3-1 sites.
|
1699.10 | Will you be posting the location for internal users? | MUTTON::LAMB | Peter Lamb - FSG Santa Clara | Wed Jan 24 1990 23:04 | 0 |
1699.11 | patch available very soon | VMSSPT::TCARR | | Thu Jan 25 1990 09:23 | 7 |
| re: .9 and .10
The patch that will correct this problem has been given to me by
Decwindows Engineering. I am in the process of putting the patch into
a VMS installable format. When the patch is complete, I will post
another note giving the name of the patch. You can then obtain the
patch from any of the CSCs by referencing the patch name.
|
1699.12 | patch is now available | VMSSG::TCARR | | Tue Jan 30 1990 09:54 | 8 |
|
The notice was sent out this morning to all CSC's regrading the
availability of the patch to correct this problem. If you require this
patch, contact the CSC and ask for patch DECWPRINT$PATCH01_530 and tell
them that it is available in the CSSE VOID patch distribution system. If
you are an internal user, you can call the CSC also. I think you will have
to give them your badge number to get access to the patch. Do not
contact engineering to try to get this patch.
|
1699.13 | Just some more questions. | EVTIS2::HOANG | | Wed Jan 31 1990 06:16 | 28 |
|
Hi,
Thanks for the quick Patch. We've waited for a long time..
I've just installed the patch this morning on my system (VS2000)
under VMS 5.3 . It works fine, Ican do the output on the LJ250.
However, I've some little questions and please correct me if
I'm wrong :
a) After installing the patch, when logging in and doing a SHOW
SYSTEM , I've seen 2 new processes :
HOANG_SM1
HOANG_SM2
It seems that there're 2 Sessions processes. I don't remember if
it already exists with VMS 5.3 . Am I right ?
b) When capturing a big portion of screen( 1/4 of screen) with
a lot of colors, it takes about 10mn to produce a file. When printing,
we don't get all the colors, but only with about 32 colors. Is it
normal ?
I know that this is only a patch to correct a big problem, if
you could get more informations, please HELP..
Thanks for any input, and thanks again for the
patch
Dung HOANG
TSC EVRY FRANCE
|
1699.14 | engineering will need to respond to your question | VMSSPT::TCARR | | Wed Jan 31 1990 09:27 | 3 |
| I will let the moderator comment on that. I do not know the specifics
of the side effects, if there are any, of this patch. The moderator will
be able to comment better or find out the information for you .
|
1699.15 | Color doesn't work with patch | TOOLEY::B_WACKER | | Fri Feb 02 1990 11:57 | 4 |
| With the patch applied to 5.3 all I get is a grey scale rendition on
an lj250, even though color is set in customize.
Has anyone been able to get color sixel to work???
|
1699.16 | operator error | TOOLEY::B_WACKER | | Tue Feb 06 1990 13:23 | 3 |
| The patch does work. My printer didn't.
Bruce
|
1699.17 | | TALLIS::MCAFEE | Steve McAfee | Tue Mar 13 1990 15:53 | 8 |
|
Could someone please elaborate on exactly who I contact to get
the patch? Like maybe a phone number? No one around here
even knows what a CSC is...
thanks,
steve
|
1699.18 | Ya gotta be a Customer of someone | TOOLEY::B_WACKER | | Wed Mar 14 1990 10:16 | 10 |
| >Could someone please elaborate on exactly who I contact to get the
>patch?
It depends on your organization and who your software support is
through. The phone number will depend on who you're authorized to
contact. On the other hand if you'll send me a world writable
location I'll copy the patch over as long as you understand that it is
"experimental", no guarantees, etc., etc.
Bruce
|
1699.19 | Phone numbers for CSC's | PEACHS::BELDIN | | Wed Mar 14 1990 14:59 | 24 |
| >
> Could someone please elaborate on exactly who I contact to get
> the patch? Like maybe a phone number? No one around here
> even knows what a CSC is...
>
> thanks,
>
> steve
In the phone directory that I have, November 1989, on page 281 the numbers
for (of course it is not under Customer Support Center):
Field Service - In-DEC Area (Internal customers)
CSC/AT (Atlanta, GA)
Microsystems/PC's/Terminals (also GKS,PHIGS,DECWINDOWS,DECIMAGE,
VWS, ect) 1(800)332-8000
CSC/CS (Hardware) 1(800)525-6570
CSC/CS (Software) 1(800)525-7100
Rick
|
1699.20 | | PEACHS::GILBERT | Jeff Gilbert, VMS workstations support, CSC/AT | Mon Apr 02 1990 21:37 | 43 |
| I have been able to reproduce a problem a customer is having after installing
both the color sixel vs postscript patch and the b/w printscreen corruption
patch. The b/w printscreen patch didn't seem to do a dern thing and although
I now generate color sixel instead of postscript files these color sixel files
are corrupted.
The problem is this:
If I hold the paper at the orientation that it came out of the printer,
reguardless of what orientation printscreen has turned the image, I see
horizontal 1/16" rows of black interlaced with 1/16" horizontal lines of
yellow superimposed over the top of the actual image. If I type the
captured file in a DECterm, the resulting graphic is corrupted the same
as when it is printed.
Since a picture is worth 1k words, here is what a printscreen of a white
area of the screen looks like.
each character is bwwbwwb...
an lj250 pixel wwwwwww...
bwwbwwb...
b = black wwwwwww...
w = white bwwbwwb...
y = yellow wwwwwww...
bwwbwwb...
wwwwwww...
ywwywwy...
wwwwwww...
ywwywwy...
wwwwwww...
ywwywwy...
wwwwwww...
ywwywwy...
:::::::
.......
(This problem is also discussed in note 2283. of this conference.)
Is there any new information on this?
Is it something that I am doing wrong?
Is it being addressed?
Thanks,
Jeff
|
1699.21 | maybe depth? | TOOLEY::B_WACKER | | Tue Apr 03 1990 11:42 | 4 |
| Well, at least someone else is reporting the same problem I've seen
and I'm not completely daft. I think it may have to do with the depth
of a decterm which defaults to 4, but I haven't had a chance to fiddle
with it.
|