T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1601.1 | | STAR::MFOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Wed Oct 18 1989 23:24 | 9 |
|
DECpresenter sounds from what I've heard to be 10k times better
than the old VWS SIGHT. So, I suspect that will be our
"Super-PAINT". Personally, I can't wait for DECpresenter!!
mike
|
1601.2 | You want a Mac, get a Mac | EPIK::J_JOSEPH | Living in the Pasture | Thu Oct 19 1989 15:21 | 15 |
| For DECwindows V3, paint will have color and some other nifty stuff.
Because Paint (like all the other DECwindows products) has to run on every
platform which DECwindows runs on, it is likely that certain enhancements
may have to be sacrificed because the resources may not be available on every
platform. Paint was never intended to incorporate any object oriented (draw)
elements. Both DECwrite (which is aready out there) and DECpresenter will
have object oriented capabilities, and both may include a bitmap image created
with paint (so you can get two both layers with these products). I (just me)
am the entire development team for DECpaint, so what I can do for V3, I will.
What I can't do won't make it into V3, and that's all I can say.
-Jonathan
|
1601.3 | I may be getting ahead of myself | EPIK::J_JOSEPH | Living in the Pasture | Thu Oct 19 1989 15:39 | 15 |
| I may be getting ahead of myself here. It's certainly not a majority of
people who have access to DECwindows V2 (although it may be a majority of the
readers of this conference). V2 paint (though still monochrome) is much
improved over V1, though not in terms of specialized painting tools. It was
not our desire to create an application with a great deal of nifty yet not
largely used tools. We instead created an application which has a basic set
of commonly used tools. The largest functionality difference between V2 and
V1 is the ability to edit images larger than the screen, and to set the
resolution (useful for editing 300 DPI images)
-Jonathan
|
1601.4 | If you're looking for inputs, look at these... | DELNI::MHARRIS | Netwrk Integ'n Projects | Fri Oct 20 1989 11:02 | 24 |
| I completely understand. Sounds like you have a great deal of items on
YOUR list, and only 1 person to do it!
Is it possible to take a look at some of the packages commonly
available on the market (like MACdraw II , or Super-Paint)
and see which features actually makes sense? I totally agree that MANY
features in these external packages are nit features, BUT, there are
still a great deal of REALLY useable features. (Take a look at their
3-D wire frame OBJECTs, or the dithering mechanisms, or their alignment
techniques- These were all really nice and would be used WIDELY.)
As a aside, I am part of the project team implementing the DIGITAL
ROADSHOW (32 cities over 5 months, 1st city: Houston on 24-Oct-89)
DURING the show, we need to demo a great deal of product and
capabilities. At one point, we will draw the MAILbus and NAS diagrams.
We have chosen the SuperPAINT application on the MAC to do it due to
the limited functionality of our DECW$PAINT. If WE had to do it, I can
only believe that our CUSTOMERS will make similiar choices...
(No energy here, just wanted to explain my interest in PAINT as a REAL
product which has some VERY REAL applications for our customers.)
Mark
|
1601.5 | Did you miss something in Jonathan's note? | EPIK::BUEHLER | The status quo is what you make of it. | Fri Oct 20 1989 11:33 | 10 |
| > capabilities. At one point, we will draw the MAILbus and NAS diagrams.
> We have chosen the SuperPAINT application on the MAC to do it due to
Why not use DECwrite? It provides text and graphics drawing
capabilities at the object level instead of the pixel level. It just
doesn't do color yet (and DECpresenter will be addressing that in their
V1 release).
John
|
1601.6 | DECwrite is like buying a gas station to fillup your tank | DELNI::MHARRIS | Netwrk Integ'n Projects | Fri Oct 20 1989 16:20 | 15 |
| No, didn't miss anything... In fact I'm one of the biggest advocates of
using DEcwrite, but in comparison to the simplicity found when using
SUPERpaint, it doesn't come off well. In fact, customers can relate
directly to PAINT-type applications, while they hesitate to adjust to
using a full-blown documentation package to get at the simple
'DRAW A PICTURE' need. -- DECwrite would do it fine, but it involves
more operations just to get you to the point where you can
begin drawing.
If they feel they want and understand PAINT, we'll do it with Paint.
(Now next year, maybe DECpresentor, or DECW$PAINT, or...?)
Mark
|
1601.7 | Just a thought | EPIK::BUEHLER | The status quo is what you make of it. | Fri Oct 20 1989 17:54 | 7 |
| >-< DECwrite is like buying a gas station to fillup your tank >-
I guess. I don't have a user's perspective on DECwrite, so I'll trust
your views.
John
|