[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference bulova::decw_jan-89_to_nov-90

Title:DECWINDOWS 26-JAN-89 to 29-NOV-90
Notice:See 1639.0 for VMS V5.3 kit; 2043.0 for 5.4 IFT kit
Moderator:STAR::VATNE
Created:Mon Oct 30 1989
Last Modified:Mon Dec 31 1990
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:3726
Total number of notes:19516

1601.0. "Will PAINT be improved?" by DELNI::MHARRIS (Netwrk Integ'n Projects) Wed Oct 18 1989 18:59

    Is any group in this company working on a SUPER-DECW$PAINT?
    
    I did a dir/keyw=PAINT and found two dated notes. Doesn't appear to
    have an answer.
    
    Seems like graphics are one of the hottest topics that we and our
    customers are asking about, but the PAINT program that ships with
    DECWINDOWS is primative in comparison to commercial pkgs available for
    IBM-PC's and MAC's.
    
    I had the need to create a drawing so I tried SUPER-paint on a MAC.
    Whew! Puts DIGITAL's paint to shame.  I am told that other pkgs are
    even BETTER than SUPER-Paint. (I can't imagine!)
    
    Is PAINT something being worked on as part of the DECwindows program?
    
    Mark

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1601.1STAR::MFOLEYRebel without a ClueWed Oct 18 1989 23:249
       
       
       	
       DECpresenter sounds from what I've heard to be 10k times better
       than the old VWS SIGHT. So, I suspect that will be our
       "Super-PAINT". Personally, I can't wait for DECpresenter!!
       
       							mike

1601.2You want a Mac, get a MacEPIK::J_JOSEPHLiving in the PastureThu Oct 19 1989 15:2115
	For DECwindows V3, paint will have color and some other nifty stuff.
Because Paint (like all the other DECwindows products) has to run on every
platform which DECwindows runs on, it is likely that certain enhancements 
may have to be sacrificed because the resources may not be available on every
platform.  Paint was never intended to incorporate any object oriented (draw)
elements.  Both DECwrite (which is aready out there) and DECpresenter will
have object oriented capabilities, and both may include a bitmap image created
with paint (so you can get two both layers with these products).  I (just me)
am the entire development team for DECpaint, so what I can do for V3, I will.
What I can't do won't make it into V3, and that's all I can say.

-Jonathan



1601.3I may be getting ahead of myselfEPIK::J_JOSEPHLiving in the PastureThu Oct 19 1989 15:3915
I may be getting ahead of myself here.  It's certainly not a majority of 
people who have access to DECwindows V2 (although it may be a majority of the
readers of this conference).  V2 paint (though still monochrome) is much
improved over V1, though not in terms of specialized painting tools.  It was
not our desire to create an application with a great deal of nifty yet not
largely used tools.  We instead created an application which has a basic set
of commonly used tools.  The largest functionality difference between V2 and
V1 is the ability to edit images larger than the screen, and to set the 
resolution (useful for editing 300 DPI images)

-Jonathan




1601.4If you're looking for inputs, look at these...DELNI::MHARRISNetwrk Integ'n ProjectsFri Oct 20 1989 11:0224
    I completely understand.  Sounds like you have a great deal of items on
    YOUR list, and only 1 person to do it!
    
    Is it possible to take a look at some of the packages commonly
    available on the market (like MACdraw II , or Super-Paint)
    and see which features actually makes sense? I totally agree that MANY
    features in these external packages are nit features, BUT, there are
    still a great deal of REALLY useable features. (Take a look at their
    3-D wire frame OBJECTs, or the dithering mechanisms, or their alignment
    techniques- These were all really nice and would be used WIDELY.)
    
    As a aside, I am part of the project team implementing the DIGITAL
    ROADSHOW (32 cities over 5 months, 1st city: Houston on 24-Oct-89)
    DURING the show, we need to demo a great deal of product and
    capabilities. At one point, we will draw the MAILbus and NAS diagrams.
    We have chosen the SuperPAINT application on the MAC to do it due to
    the limited functionality of our DECW$PAINT.  If WE had to do it, I can
    only believe that our CUSTOMERS will make similiar choices...
    
    (No energy here, just wanted to explain my interest in PAINT as a REAL
    product which has some VERY REAL applications for our customers.)
    
    Mark

1601.5Did you miss something in Jonathan's note?EPIK::BUEHLERThe status quo is what you make of it.Fri Oct 20 1989 11:3310
>    capabilities. At one point, we will draw the MAILbus and NAS diagrams.
>    We have chosen the SuperPAINT application on the MAC to do it due to
    
    Why not use DECwrite?  It provides text and graphics drawing
    capabilities at the object level instead of the pixel level.  It just
    doesn't do color yet (and DECpresenter will be addressing that in their
    V1 release).
    
John

1601.6DECwrite is like buying a gas station to fillup your tankDELNI::MHARRISNetwrk Integ'n ProjectsFri Oct 20 1989 16:2015
    No, didn't miss anything... In fact I'm one of the biggest advocates of
    using DEcwrite, but in comparison to the simplicity found when using
    SUPERpaint, it doesn't come off well. In fact, customers can relate
    directly to PAINT-type applications, while they hesitate to adjust to
    using a full-blown documentation package to get at the simple
    'DRAW A PICTURE' need.  -- DECwrite would do it fine, but it involves
    more operations just to get you to the point where you can
    begin drawing.
    
    If they feel they want and understand PAINT, we'll do it with Paint.
    
    (Now next year, maybe DECpresentor, or DECW$PAINT, or...?)
    
    Mark

1601.7Just a thoughtEPIK::BUEHLERThe status quo is what you make of it.Fri Oct 20 1989 17:547
>-< DECwrite is like buying a gas station to fillup your tank >-
    
    I guess.  I don't have a user's perspective on DECwrite, so I'll trust
    your views.
    
John