| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 1375.1 | vaudeville has the answer, now :-) | MINNIE::DOUG | to bless and not to curse | Wed Sep 06 1989 11:34 | 5 |
| man (holding his arm over his head): "doctor, it hurts when i do
this."
doctor: "don't do that."
|
| 1375.2 | Any fixes? | PTEVAX::PICHE | | Wed Sep 06 1989 12:09 | 10 |
| That's the obvious answer. We already took the doctors advise.
However, since the Digital school of medicine requires all systems to
run Securepack I was looking for a fix or work around.
@ @
>
v
Guy
|
| 1375.3 | Re SecurePak [sp] | HYDRA::COAR | Have you mutated yet to-day? | Wed Sep 06 1989 12:12 | 6 |
| Actually, I think all systems have to have it installed, not necessarily have
it running. At any rate, that's how I interpreted the policy back in St Louis..
I think the wording is currently ambiguous enough for you to get away with this.
#ken :-)}
|
| 1375.4 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Sep 06 1989 14:44 | 7 |
| Also, the component of SECURPACK that kills the sessions is the Idle
Process Monitor, an entirely optional thing.
Besides, SECURPACK doesn't work on V5.2 or later, last I checked.
Steve
|
| 1375.5 | | LESLIE::LESLIE | Fat was then - thinner is now | Wed Sep 06 1989 18:05 | 5 |
| Running the Idle Process Killer is a non sequitor on a Workstation
anyhow. Securepak runs on 5.2.
- ���
|
| 1375.6 | | VISA::GENTILI | Banlieue Boogie Cardiac Blues | Thu Sep 07 1989 06:03 | 11 |
|
Securpack I.P.M. has got a process exclusion list.
Please enter your topic in the Securpack Notes conference on
VISA::SECURPACK
Securpack V3.3 which is going to be available next week supports
VMS V5.2.
Franc
|
| 1375.7 | Catch-22 | ERIS::CALLAS | The Torturer's Apprentice | Thu Sep 07 1989 12:12 | 7 |
| Actually, Securpack is not required. The Securpack guidelines say that
you shouldn't run any privileged software that you don't have sources
for. And the Securpack people won't give you the sources for their
stuff, so if you follow their guidelines, you don't run their software.
Jon
|
| 1375.8 | Really Catch-22 have to use VMS :-) | KNOWAY::WOLFF | Conformism is for little minds. | Tue Oct 24 1989 22:25 | 12 |
| Re: .7
Huh? What about VMS? I don't get all the sources, we both know there is
a censor list of stuff that doesn't go outside. Does this mean I am
stuck with my home grown Operating system??
Can I quote you and remove Inspect from my system?
Besides that, I agree with you, Secupack is not required nor mentioned
in the leatest MEM security policy.
Julian.
|
| 1375.9 | | STAR::MFOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Tue Oct 24 1989 23:41 | 11 |
|
RE: .7
But John (and I) have access to the complete sources so the point
is moot.. :-)
mike
VMS Development System Manager
(yea, BULOVA's too.)
|