T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
197.1 | any hints ? | VISA::BIJAOUI | Tomorrow Never Knows | Tue Feb 14 1989 13:21 | 7 |
| Could you please give us some typical values that would make the server
more reliable, without causing any big pain to the whole system (I
mean, so the server doesn't have a pathologic behaviour).
Pierre.
|
197.2 | Kids! Have fun! Experiment! | DECWIN::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO3-4/W23 | Tue Feb 14 1989 20:34 | 12 |
| Well, the default values were supposed to be reasonable, but as Edith
implied, the timing came out to be 10ths of milliseconds instead of
milliseconds. Thus, if you multiply the retry interval default values
will see more what we intended.
Actually, you might try leaving the retry interval the same and
multiplying only the number of retries. That will give it more chances
to succeed before it finally gives up.
Burns
|
197.3 | Questions | GOBBLR::MULHEREN | Kelly Mulheren, GObE & NetEd | Wed Feb 15 1989 12:54 | 17 |
| A few questions about defining these logical names:
1. When can they be defined? On a running server, strictly at server startup,
between successive "session quit/session start" pairs?
2. What logical name table should they be defined in? System, DECwindows?
I'm very anxious to experiment with these. The default values make it difficult
to do interactive transformations on moderately complex GObE and NetEd objects
from remote clients without having connections aborted. Several products that
use GObE and NetEd have reported this problem to us and I'd love to have a
solution, or at least a temporary workaround.
Thanks,
Kelly
|
197.4 | | DECWIN::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO3-4/W23 | Wed Feb 15 1989 13:46 | 10 |
| They should get read every time the server resets (that means at startup and
everytime you log out...when the cursor moves itself to the middle).
As to the table, the server looks in LNM_FILE_DEV, but it has previously
modified LNM_FILE_DEV to have DECW$SERVER0_TABLE at the beginning (assuming
server 0, which is the only one we support). Thus you should be able to
put it in the SYSTEM table, as long as it does not appear in DECW$SERVER0_TABLE.
Burns
|
197.5 | re: .1 & .3 | STAR::TAN | | Wed Feb 15 1989 14:03 | 14 |
| Re:.3
I would just define them in the DECW$SERVER0_TABLE to play it safe.
Re:.1
You can define them as what Burns has suggested, or just make them
10 times the default values. That should give you a longer, yet
tolerable retry period, so you can get your work done. This is
strictly for V51 server.
Edith
|
197.6 | | VISA::BIJAOUI | Tomorrow Never Knows | Thu Feb 16 1989 02:18 | 8 |
| � This is
� strictly for V51 server.
Ah Ah ! What about T5.2-40B servers then ?
Pierre.
|
197.7 | re: .6 | STAR::TAN | | Thu Feb 16 1989 10:54 | 10 |
| Sorry, I meant to say for version 1 server. There is no change
on this for v52 server either. But on version 2 server(no idea which
version of vms it would tie in), I plan to change the default retry
interval unit to ms, so that the retry interval will be every 1.5 cpu sec.,
and a total of 20 retries.
Edith
|
197.8 | retry logicals for v52 server | STAR::TAN | | Wed May 31 1989 13:02 | 8 |
| For the v52 decwindows server, these two logicals are pre-defined
to different values in the decw$startserver.com. After some
experiment, we found a smaller interval and more retries to be
a reasonable setting. So they are set to be .5 second interval and
60 retries.
Edith
|
197.9 | What about ... | VISA::BIJAOUI | Tomorrow Never Knows | Wed May 31 1989 13:53 | 7 |
| For DECnet connections, what about making the retry period as long as
DECnet time-out for links (is it 240sec time-out by default). That
would make the whole lot consistent, wouldn't it ?
Pierre.
|
197.10 | We'll stay with our defaults | STAR::TAN | | Thu Jun 01 1989 13:43 | 7 |
| We are interested only to keep the server alive, and a reasonably short
delay, approixmately 30 seconds, is about as much as we can tolerate.
But you can always experiment with setting the max to the decnet
timeout value to see whether it helps in your environment.
Edith
|
197.11 | Come Again | CSC32::JJONES | Jeff Jones | Mon Jun 12 1989 18:57 | 22 |
| Please, oh, please - Am running VMS 5.2-42W and for two main remote
applications (DECwrite and BOOKreader) I can only maintain a remote
link for, on good days, 5 to 10 minutes without getting XLIB IO ERROR.
My default settings are as follows:
DECW$SERVER_RETRY_WRITE_MAX = 30000
DECW$SERVER_RETRY_WRITE_MIN = 500
Have tried setting them to 1000000 and 25000, respectively. If anything
it got worse. But the problem is real sporadic.
What should I have them set to?
[extra]
Have not been able to test this out yet but have others which
are plauged with the same problem, they are on THINWIRE (like me).
Got a person on THICKWIRE, and he swears that he never sees the
problem. Could this somehow be related to the problem?
Please respond,
jjjones/Colorado CSC DECwindows Support
|
197.12 | What's your configuration and network load? | EPIK::BUEHLER | Let's get out there and kick some bitts. | Tue Jun 13 1989 09:57 | 8 |
| What is the network load on the machine you are running DECwrite from?
Some users have suggested that the Xlib IO Error problems stem from
network loading. [This may be obvious to those in the know] One user
disabled recognition of boot requests on their boot member and he says
that the error rate dropped considerably.
John
|
197.13 | Try this.... | VINO::WITHROW | Robert Withrow | Tue Jun 13 1989 10:48 | 19 |
| > Have not been able to test this out yet but have others which
> are plauged with the same problem, they are on THINWIRE (like me).
> Got a person on THICKWIRE, and he swears that he never sees the
> problem. Could this somehow be related to the problem?
I had similar problems with a VS2000 once when another person connected
improperly to the same thinwire port. I experienced *very* slow decwindows
operation and droped links! If this is your situation, I suggest you take
the following actions to see if it helps:
1) Disconnect *everything* from the thinwire port (on the wall).
2) Connect *only* your workstation. Perform the connection *exactly*
as described the the hardware users guide for your workstation. Use
*exactly* the same hardware/terminator/cable as described!
3) Use the *as installed* defaults for the parameters you are twiddling.
I'll think you will then have a stable decwindows link situation. You can then
try adding other hardware to the thinwire and see what happens.
|
197.14 | | VWSENG::KLEINSORGE | Toys 'R' Us | Tue Jun 13 1989 10:54 | 11 |
|
I occasionally go through the office looking for improperly terminated
thinwire connections. Using the standard DECconnect stuff in our
offices you can tell a bad connection almost immediately - it usually
is a "Tee" connector hooked to the DECconnect box. This usually means
2 terminators in the office. There can only be ONE terminator on this
type configuration. The standard problem is people with 2, 3 or more
devices in their office with thinwire connections.
|
197.15 | is this new math? | NEURON::NICHOLSON | A belly as big as an oil spill | Sat Jun 17 1989 21:08 | 17 |
| I have been confused by some of the information in this note.
In .0, it was stated that the unit for retry is 1/10 of a millisecond
and that the default setting is 15000 or .15 seconds. I don't think
that math works, i.e. 15000 times 1/10 of a millisecond is 1.5.
In .7 it was stated that the unit didn't change for v52 server.
In .8 it states that the logicals are set in v5.2 startup files
to have a retry of .5 second and 60 retries. The values that I
see in my server table are 500 for MIN and 30000 for MAX. That
would only be true if the unit were milliseconds.
What's going on?
Thanks,
Mark
|
197.16 | No new math, just human error | STAR::TAN | | Mon Jun 19 1989 12:16 | 8 |
| No, this is not new math. It was a programming error internal to the
server, which caused some confusion of the unit used in the retry
count for the vms V52 decwindows server. For the vms V2 decwindows
server, the default value for the write-retry logicals will be those
stated in 197.8. I apologize for the confusion caused.
Edith
|
197.17 | Let's get all the info in one place! | BOOTIS::WESTON | Fish shaped hysteria | Thu Jul 20 1989 12:24 | 21 |
| Let's get all the info in one place. Can someone in the know confirm or
correct the following.
For the V52 server:
The units are in mS.
The default value for DECW$WSERVER_RETRY_MIN is 500 (i.e., 0.5 seconds).
The default value for DECW$WSERVER_RETRY_MAX is 30000 (i.e., 30 seconds).
The logicals should be defined /TABLE=DECW$SERVER0_TABLE in
SYS$MANAGER:DECW$STARTSERVER.COM
To make the new values take effect, I must log out of DECwindows and back in
again.
Please confirm or correct this information.
-Les.
|
197.18 | One correction | DECWIN::FISHER | Burns Fisher 381-1466, ZKO3-4/W23 | Fri Jul 21 1989 16:47 | 29 |
| Let's get all the info in one place. Can someone in the know confirm or
correct the following.
For the V52 server:
The units are in mS.
***Correct
The default value for DECW$WSERVER_RETRY_MIN is 500 (i.e., 0.5 seconds).
***Correct, except for the "w" in the name
The default value for DECW$WSERVER_RETRY_MAX is 30000 (i.e., 30 seconds).
***Correct (again, except for the "W")
The logicals should be defined /TABLE=DECW$SERVER0_TABLE in
SYS$MANAGER:DECW$STARTSERVER.COM
***No. This will work, but the correct place to put them is in your
***SYS$MANAGER:DECW$PRIVATE_SERVER_SETUP.COM file, assuming you want something
***different from the default. If you define these things as global symbols,
***the right thing will go into the right table.
To make the new values take effect, I must log out of DECwindows and back in
again.
***Correct.
Burns
|
197.19 | Happening on a new 3100 SPX machine... | LAIDBK::ELLISON | That is truly a wetbrain concept. | Wed May 02 1990 17:55 | 14 |
|
I'm running into this error on a VAXstation 3100 SPX with local
connections. The server dies when it happens. (At least I that's whats
causinag the server to die.)
I know that there are some logicals that can be defined to get more
logging info for the server, but I can't find them here in the notes
file...
Could some one point me in the right direction or provide an assist?
Thanks -
Jan
dtn 533-7787
|
197.20 | Get the server log | DECWIN::FISHER | Prune Juice: A Warrior's Drink! | Wed May 02 1990 18:45 | 1 |
| You should always get a log DECW$SERVER_0_ERROR.LOG in SYS$MANAGER.
|
197.21 | I'm looking for more detail though | LAIDBK::ELLISON | That is truly a wetbrain concept. | Wed May 02 1990 19:14 | 9 |
|
Yeh- I know that, the problem is that there doesn't seem to be enough
(sometimes any) info to make a firm determination.
I've seen reference to a logical name which would turn on a more
detailed level of logging, but I just can't seem to find it...
Jan
dtn 533-7787
|
197.22 | No variations for server logging | STAR::VATNE | Peter Vatne, VMS Development | Wed May 02 1990 20:10 | 4 |
| > I've seen reference to a logical name which would turn on a more
> detailed level of logging, but I just can't seem to find it...
There is no logical name to make the server log any additional information.
|
197.23 | Rats | LAIDBK::ELLISON | That is truly a wetbrain concept. | Wed May 02 1990 20:24 | 3 |
|
Rats- Oh well, thanks for the help
|
197.24 | | STAR::KLEINSORGE | Fred Kleinsorge, VMS Development | Thu May 03 1990 10:40 | 5 |
|
How about - DECW$SERVER_DUMP
This should get a process dump on the server...
|
197.25 | | DECWIN::FISHER | Prune Juice: A Warrior's Drink! | Thu May 03 1990 12:46 | 10 |
| That is only if the server dies, and besides, I have never been able to do
anything useful with a server dump.
I think you'll find that if the server log does not say anything about a
process being thrown off, (with more than just "connection closed") that
it was not the server which initiated the shutdown (in particular it was not
because the event queue filled up. I'm pretty sure there is a log message for
that.)
Burns
|
197.26 | More on this | LAIDBK::ELLISON | That is truly a wetbrain concept. | Thu May 03 1990 17:26 | 16 |
|
I'm still trying to get solid information on these crashes.
The symtoms are that the user 'quits' via the session manager and the
server goes away, no logo comes up, no login dialog box. In fact it's
like being at an LA100 glass teletype...
The server log file is either empty or has the error in the .-?
note indicated...
Jan
I was sure that some kind of logical name existed for increasing
logging information. Maybe it was for the Session Manager?
|
197.27 | | DECWIN::JMSYNGE | James M Synge, VMS Development | Mon May 14 1990 13:05 | 8 |
| Jan,
Have you looked at the accounting data to see what the final
status for the server process was? If you don't have accounting
turned on, please do so, as this data is useful.
Which version of VMS are you running?
James
|
197.28 | Patch available | DECWIN::ROSENBLUM | | Tue Jun 05 1990 11:31 | 4 |
| This looks like the same problem described in note 2665
There is now a patch available thru the CSC, more info
in 2665
|