T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1040.1 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | in the year 2525... | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:03 | 18 |
|
the job.
If I experience challenges and joy, and feel I am growing, as long as I
can support myself fairly comfortably, I'm happy.
And moreover, it's not just the job, but the workplace, and the people
in it, and the possibilities for learning and growth, all combined,
that makes the job attractive.
I will admit that 3 things interested me in my vocational high school
(cosmetology, fluid power (hydraulics, pneumatics), and electronics),
and I chose the field that I hoped would earn the most after
graduation, but I enjoyed all three.
-Jody
|
1040.2 | | USWRSL::SHORTT_LA | Everything I do... | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:11 | 12 |
| I'm speaking from experience...the job. I expected to take a major
pay cut when I head to the book store. My district manager has wangled
a way to keep my same pay...but I already accepted the other job and
had put my notice in here *before* I knew how much I would get.
I came here for two reasons...benefits and money. I can buy better
benefits than I've been getting. And money just isn't worth not
*wanting* to go to work. I'll never seel out for money again.
L.J.
|
1040.3 | can't afford principles ;-( | SA1794::CHARBONND | Northern Exposure? | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:13 | 2 |
| I don't make enough to take a $4-5/hour cut, so it would have to be
the money.
|
1040.4 | one vote for MONEY. | CSC32::PITT | | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:32 | 11 |
|
It used to be for the job...until I started HATING this job.
Now it's a necessity of life.
It's more than just the $$. Seems that pay is also a measure of
what your employer things of you.
It's hard to feel good about what you do when it's obvious that the
company doesn't think you're worth SQUAT.
....given a choice? The money.
|
1040.5 | | PSYLO::STONE | | Tue Sep 17 1991 15:41 | 11 |
| right now I would say it is neither the job or the money keeping me
here. I sit back and think that I have been with the company for
10 years and am making X amount of dollars. I friend of mine got a job
in Worc, Ma at Allegro (formally Sprague), has worked there since last
Oct and is making 3 less an hour than I am. And it's not like she
started at a glorious position either....people think working at DEC
that everyone makes $60,000K or better....
even though the ideal job may come along, if i had to make $4-$5 less
an hour, I couldn't do it.....bottom line.......in it for the money (ya
right, someday)
|
1040.6 | best = having both the job and the $$ | CADSYS::PSMITH | foop-shootin', flip city! | Tue Sep 17 1991 16:16 | 17 |
| The job (vocation, career, lifestyle...!)
From my experience, if it's the right job, the joys of doing what I
love make up for the $$. If I can wake up psyched to do what I do for
6-8 hours a day versus resigned to doing what I have to do for the day,
that's worth any amount of dinaro. After all, I want the $$ so I can
get things to make me happy; I might as well just be happy first!
I'm currently switching over from doing what I do (writing manuals) to
doing what I love with massage therapy (and singing in a band and my
latest, teaching aerobics!) ... letting go of security is hard but for
me, WORTH it.
"Do What You Love, the Money Will Follow" by Marsha Sinetar is a
mind-blowing book if this question fascinates you!
Pam
|
1040.7 | Go for the money | ELWOOD::CHRISTIE | | Tue Sep 17 1991 17:04 | 6 |
| If I could find a company that offered my $27,000/yr or more, I would
be gone in a minute. If you don't make a decent pay, then why
work?
Linda
|
1040.8 | Stuck between a rock & a hard place... | BOOVX2::MANDILE | I love readin' & ridin' | Tue Sep 17 1991 17:23 | 8 |
| The money lets me have the things I want/care most
about....our own house in the country, my horses,
etc. etc.....
I would love to change jobs to one I would enjoy, but
I would have to give up too much of the things I have.
HRH
|
1040.9 | | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Tue Sep 17 1991 17:34 | 7 |
| The money. Without question. Just finished reading a book where the
protagonist's father always told her to "Have a firm handshake and
always go where they pay you more money." Seem wise to me!
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"
Sandy
|
1040.10 | I've done it - it works | TYGON::WILDE | why am I not yet a dragon? | Tue Sep 17 1991 18:09 | 36 |
| I managed to stumble into a very satisfying, demanding, scary, and occasionally
frustrating job working for a non-profit organization focused on getting the
"hard core" welfare recipents off welfare and into the ranks of the working.
I loved that job - and I was poor. I took the job straight from working as
a private consultant - and my pay cut was more than 50%. Admittedly, I was
responsible for my own taxes and health care while a consultant...and I did
have a health plan, and normal tax withholding for the job at the CET, but
the net result in difference in pay was approx. 40% less spending money.
Luckily, I live pretty simply, except for the nice furniture I have these
days....and which I've purchased since I returned to DIGITAL. I didn't
really miss the money, but I did have to do a lot of "pooling" of resources
with other folks at the center - I baked/cook/taught how to cook/taught how
to use a computer in return for car maintenance, for instance.
I would probably not have stopped working at the CET, but the program funding
dried up in the Reagan years. I would certainly NOT be working here at
DIGITAL if I was not truly satisfied, challenged, terrified, exhilerated, and
entertained by the work I do. I like my job. I don't want a promotion to
a fancier title where my "window" of available tasks will be narrowed by
that title, and I have made that clear to my mangement...they are just a
little confused by this as their program has been to help develop women
executives and help get them promoted into management jobs. I am NOT
explained in the management training manuals.
I am now making a great deal more money and I have some nice furniture for
the first time in my life. I like that too...but, if this job does not
satisfy me in the future, I will go find one that does...and it will probably
pay much less and have a lot more to do with helping others DIRECTLY than this
current job...
after all, money enough to keep me a place to live where I can have
my cats and dog, clothed appropriately to be comfortable, clean to not be
an insult to others, fed to be healthy and alert, and a little to put aside
for when noone wants my services is all I NEED.
|
1040.11 | | KVETCH::paradis | Music, Sex, and Cookies | Tue Sep 17 1991 18:43 | 25 |
| Ultimately, satisfaction is a combination of job AND pay; pay me enough and
I'll do ALMOST anything... but it better be so damned much that I get to
retire on about an hour's pay! On the other hand, even the most ideal-est
job in the world is nothing if I can't afford a roof over my head for what
I'm being paid...
Here's a data point for you: Some years back I was working at a startup
company that was burning me out big-time. The place was losing money
as fast as it could, didn't have a decent product to sell, and I felt like
I was the only one who cared. I burned myself out trying to give them
200% all the time and still it wasn't enough. After enough of this, I
looked for another job, found one, and gave notice. Naturally, they tried
to talk me out of it. At the eleventh hour, my boss comes to me and says,
"Will you stay for $XXXXX?" Now, $XXXXX was far more than I was fighting
tooth-and-nail to get during my job search, so I jumped at it.
Six months later, I was out of there. $XXXXX wasn't enough to buy my
sanity, and I was losing it fast!
Now if it were $XXXXX * 100, well, maybe I'd have stuck it out for a
year or two 8-)
But I wouldn't have stayed forever. Everyone has limits.
--jim
|
1040.12 | Do you have that in red in a size 6? | ESGWST::RDAVIS | It's what I call an epic | Tue Sep 17 1991 18:44 | 7 |
| The money, definitely. If I could make as much (and get a job) being a
clerk in a San Francisco shoe store, I'd be gone.
But programming is nice, for a day job. I'm much better off than most
of my friends, as far as hours and fatigue and money goes.
Ray
|
1040.13 | Both | SMURF::SMURF::BINDER | As magnificent as that | Tue Sep 17 1991 21:42 | 20 |
| It's a combination.
"If you can't do what you like, you'd better learn to like what you do."
To an extent that's true, at least for me. I stuck out a job that was
okay but not thrilling until something I *did* like tapped me on the
shoulder for the same money, then I was gonzo.
I've made it clear to my management, ever since my former supervisor
offered me his job he left the group, that I am an individual
contributor, not a management type. i don't need the ulcers, thank
you, I get enough doing what I enjoy! But this philosophy is to some
extent made possible by Digital's willingness to maintain a dual-
ladder system.
The personal pleasures of working in the specific place where I work
cannot be overemphasized, but if they offered me a 25% pay cut I'd be
outta here so fast they'd never even see me go.
-d
|
1040.14 | | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | Presto! Wrong hat. | Tue Sep 17 1991 23:47 | 35 |
|
I agree with much of what was said in .11 and .13. Ray, I loved what
you said in .12!
For me, it's a combination like -d said. Right now I think I'm in it
for the money. Changing direction in life can be expensive, and
sometimes there are expensive lessons to be learned; sometimes just
living is expensive! (Even for a single person with no dependents.)
One expensive lesson I learned was "don't abuse credit cards". It took
me a few years of aggressive outlay to pay off that lesson. Then,
after a few more years of aggressive saving, I decided to quit working
and send myself back to college. During these times, I lived with my
sister and her husband and all my household goods were eventually
absorbed into their household. After graduating, I got my current
job and moved into another established household; one where I didn't
need to acquire my own goods. During this time I was able to
supplement my mother's income during a time of need but more or less
lived high on the hog for a couple years. When I left that household
I had to buy everything I needed to establish my own household --
expensive! Now I'm in debt, so I need to make a decent salary to pay
it off in an acceptable amount of time. After I pay off my debts,
I'll probably start thinking of what I'd like to "do next".
I've liked aspects of every job I've ever had -- some jobs it was only
the co-workers that made the job enjoyable, but it was still enjoyable
and I derived great satisfaction from being a part of a tightly knit
team; other jobs that were supremely distasteful in deed (washer woman
at a nursing home) remain memorable because of the emotional rewards of
interacting with the patients. My current job is perfect in many ways
but sorely lacks in any kind of substantial emotional reward. The
money's good enough but I still have lottery fantasies. The stress
level can be very, very high. Right now my top priorities are taking
care of myself and paying off my debts.
Cq
|
1040.15 | I'd like to keep my house... | ABSISG::WAYLAY::GORDON | Of course we have secrets... | Wed Sep 18 1991 00:16 | 11 |
| A little of both...
Buying a house brings the financial aspect very much to the top,
but no matter how much someone paid me, if I weren't interested, I'd have a
hard time staying (perhaps even keeping) the job.
And a lot of things come into play. I thought seriously about
leaving my current job in DEC because my commute tripled, from 3 to 10
miles one way.
--D
|
1040.16 | no question | TLE::TLE::D_CARROLL | A woman full of fire | Wed Sep 18 1991 01:20 | 6 |
| Money.
I like my job, but if money weren't an issue, I'd be a
psychologist/social worker.
D!
|
1040.17 | One day I'll fly away.... | JUMBLY::BATTERBEEJ | Kinda lingers..... | Wed Sep 18 1991 06:08 | 15 |
| Absolutely without doubt the money. Why else would I be a contractor.
I'm also lucky that I like programming - most of the time. I have
friends that make a lot less than I do, work longer hours and hate
their jobs. I would also not be able to afford a decent place of my own,
a decent car (more important than the house!), *and* a decent standard
of living if I was not a contractor. There are times when I don't go
out 'cos none of my friends can afford to. If the money was no object
I'd become a helicopter pilot full time, and probably be out of work !
(I'm gonna fly one part time anyway one day soon). I just love flying
and having *nothing* in your way to impede max. speed progress. I
suppose being brought poor has made me determined to avoid wanting for
things ever again. Still a little boy, just the toys are more expensive.
Jerome.
|
1040.18 | set mode/parent == money | FRAMBO::HARRAH | Nota Bene | Wed Sep 18 1991 07:56 | 17 |
|
As a single person, I did things for the love of the work itself
(playing keyboards with a band, editing tracks in a studio) even though
the money was sometimes absymal.
Now that I've got a little girl, I find that the base cost of survival
has increased, well, dramatically. When it is time to fund a new
version level of school clothes, Xmas, food, lodging, and the entire
support structure required for a young one, then excuses don't cut it.
Only money does . . . . . . .(and we won't mention the upcoming
orthodontia ! ! ! . . . . . . ;-(
I still find things musical to do on the side, but DEC GMBH pays a
whole lot more funds, in a creditor-pleasing monthly fashion, then
gigging with a band ever would.
Ars gratia artis. . . . but money for God's sake !
|
1040.19 | rathole alert | SA1794::CHARBONND | Northern Exposure? | Wed Sep 18 1991 08:21 | 9 |
| re.15 >my commute tripled from 3 to 10 miles
You're kidding, right? I know people who commute 60 miles to work
in various DEC facilities. (I personally do 10 each way, used to
be 18 when I worked in WFO.) Doesn't seem to be much of a factor.
Of course, I wouldn't want to do more, but unless I transfer, I'll
have to, just to live where I want.
Dana
|
1040.20 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | cold nights, northern lights | Wed Sep 18 1991 09:29 | 3 |
| good question.
next question.
|
1040.21 | | VMSMKT::KENAH | The man with a child in his eyes... | Wed Sep 18 1991 12:16 | 7 |
| WRT: .19
Knowing Doug, I can tell you no, he wasn't kidding.
These things are all relative. Your mileage may vary.
andrew
|
1040.22 | No dope! | CALS::MALING | Mirthquake! | Wed Sep 18 1991 12:24 | 10 |
| To misquote the Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers...
Fun will get you through times of no money better than money will
get you through times of no fun.
As others have said, its a combination. For me, the people I work
with is the most important, after that comes the money and the actual
kind of work.
Mary
|
1040.23 | I LOVED being a Temp. | ELWOOD::CHRISTIE | | Wed Sep 18 1991 15:27 | 9 |
| Temping is a great job, but there are no benefits. If I could get
paid sick leave and paid vacation, I would still be temping. You
don't stay on a job long enough to get involved in any hassles. If
anyone really starts aggrivating you, just ask for a assignment.
It's my ideal job.
Linda
|
1040.24 | | RANGER::CANNOY | True initiation never ends. | Wed Sep 18 1991 16:14 | 2 |
| I'd like to say the job, but if I made $3-$4 less an hour, I couldn't
make it.
|
1040.25 | | SRATGA::SCARBERRY_CI | | Wed Sep 18 1991 17:21 | 3 |
| re.23
I know what you mean, exactly!
|
1040.26 | Job first, then money | RIPPLE::KENNEDY_KA | Trudging the Road to Happy Destiny | Thu Sep 19 1991 13:31 | 10 |
| Two years ago I left a company I had worked at for 7 years. I started
doing temp work and took a $600.00 a month cut in pay. Sure, it was
scary, I wasn't sure I would be able to meet the bills, but it worked
out great! When DEC hired me 9 months later, I was hired at $200.00 a
month more than when I quit my first company. For me, being happy what
I am doing is more important than the money.
Just my $.02
Karen
|
1040.27 | | ICS::STRIFE | | Thu Sep 19 1991 16:33 | 16 |
| I need to feel that my work is valued so I expect to be paid well. But,
I try to balance that with job satidifaction, lifestyle etc. Last
winter I was being wooed by a company for a good job with a starting
salary somewhere between 40-60% more than I'm currently making. The
job was in NYC so would have meant a major lifestyle shift for me and I
had some concerns about the culture of the company and the acceptance
and support of a senior level woman. Let me tell you even with those
concerns, the $$$$ would have been a powerful lure.
I was saved from making a decision. They told me that they thought I
was equally qualified to do the job and that in some ways they liked me
better but they thought the guys in the field would react better to
someone with an engineering background. Suspect that my concerns were
well founded.
Polly
|
1040.28 | not that easy... | MILKWY::TATISTCHEFF | feminazi extraordinaire | Thu Sep 19 1991 20:35 | 12 |
| coupla years ago i was offered 50+% raise + commission to move to new
jersey and sell microscopes. but it was a burn-out job with a burn-out
company selling a lousy product. in retrospect, i realize there were
NO other technical women there, also.
hard choice but i stayed.
the $$'s important, very important. there are lots and lots of jobs i
can like, fewer that i can like and that can give me good bucks. even
fewer that can offer sanity+security on top of it.
lt
|
1040.29 | I love being on camera! | TINCUP::XAIPE::KOLBE | The Debutante Deranged | Fri Sep 20 1991 15:41 | 7 |
| I have to say the money but the job does count too. In my experience though, the
low paying jobs actually make you deal with more sh*t than higher paying jobs.
A waitress doesn't make near the money I do but I bet she gets more grief on a
daily basis than I do.
On the other hand, I'd really rather be staring in the Field Service news video
than sitting at my desk filling out release management forms. liesl
|
1040.30 | Kids take money | USCTR2::DONOVAN | | Mon Sep 23 1991 03:34 | 13 |
| I can learn to like any job for the correcto dinero (money).
With 2 kids, a major pay cut would be a nightmare. Next month
we'll need:
2 pairs of winter boots
1 snowsuit
1 Halloween costume
After October starts Christmas shopping!!
Actually, I like my job and don't mean to complain.
Kate
|
1040.31 | Money helps but unhappiness would be every day | BENONI::JIMC | Knight of the Woeful Countenance | Thu Sep 26 1991 18:20 | 17 |
| For me it has to be a combination of both. My last job was with the
state of Massachusetts and I was seriously underpaid for what I did,
but, I had a lot of freedom, great people to work with and lots of
learning opportunities. I did not suffer. Then a friend of mine got a
job with Digital, and after about a year there was a great position
with lots of potential which was very enticing. If they had offered me
just enough to make me competitive in my field, I would have taken the
job for the potential. When they made the offer, I had trouble
speaking for a few moments 8-) and here I am. Good company, good
people to work with, great people to note with, and a job that is fun
and exciting. What more can you ask? I passed up several jobs in
between with much better pay but not much potential for growth or
development, and I never regretted it.
My 0.02
8-)
jimc
|
1040.32 | | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | just play the record | Fri Sep 27 1991 11:27 | 38 |
| re .30, if you could learn to like anything for the enough money, I
feel I should tell you about one of the help wanted ads I saw in the
Worcester Telegram last week - oil field workers, in Kuwait, $75,000. a
year; engineers, in Kuwait, $200,000. a year. Even if qualified, I'd
rather pass on those jobs.
There was also an ad in the Worcester paper for an "exotic dancer, will
train, $500/wk." That struck me as rather amusing, and probably would
be more fun than working in the oil fields, in Kuwait. But, then I
realized that I'm not qualified for that either - too old, too shy and
not the right body type. Not that great of a dancer, either, to be
honest. :-)
Seriously, though, I agree with pretty much with .31. Ideally, I think
it would be a combination of both. Also, what people consider to be a
lot of money can vary from person to person, and usually has something
to do with how much money they're used to having. For example, I would
rather have a job I loved that paid $35K a year, than a job I hated
that paid $75K a year. (But, the important thing to realize here is
that I don't make as much as $35K a year *now* and, while I don't hate
my job, I don't love it either. Basically, it pays the rent and
somebody offered to pay my living expenses I could find plenty of other
things I'd rather do.)
But, I'd rather have a job I loved that paid $25K a year than a job I
hated no matter what it paid. (When you're 85 yrs. old and dying
nobody can give you anymore time, and they'll already be fighting over
your money.)
But, I couldn't take a job I loved if it didn't pay enough to survive
on. I wouldn't take a job I loved if it only paid $10-15K a year. I'd
rather work in an antique jewelry store than be a secretary at DEC but
I couldn't get paid enough to live on. But, I'd rather own a small
jewelry store and make $30-40K a year than be an engineer and make
$65K.
Lorna
|
1040.33 | | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | just play the record | Fri Sep 27 1991 11:35 | 22 |
| Appropriate lines from a song on Van Morrison's new album.
We all know that money, don't buy you love
You just get a job and somewhere to live
You have to look for happiness, within yourself
And don't go chasin' thinkin' that it is somewhere else
I was pretending all the time
I was givin' everybody what they wanted
And I lost my peace of mind
And all I ever wanted was simply just to be me
- from I'm Not Feeling It Anymore
by Van Morrison
(I figure he must know. He probably has more money by now than
any of us do!) :-)
Lorna
|
1040.34 | Sometimes, it's the money. | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Sep 27 1991 12:24 | 8 |
| Jack Chalker spent a long time saying "I wouldn't write another Well
World book for a million dollars."
He is now writing another Well World book.
He did not change his mind.
Ann B.
|
1040.35 | | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | the sky was blue | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:00 | 5 |
| re .34, what's a Well World book? Is it a science fiction trilogy or
something? (oh, Ann, I'm so confused...)
Lorna
|
1040.36 | wishful thinkin'...... | BOOVX1::MANDILE | Lynne a.k.a. HRH | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:06 | 5 |
| I want a legit job that pays $100,000/yr, that I can wear
jeans, sneaks & a sweatshirt at, that is only 5 hrs
a day....
|
1040.37 | | VMSMKT::KENAH | The man with a child in his eyes... | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:11 | 12 |
| Lorna, Ann seems to be in full-tilt SF mode today.
Yes, she's talking about SF -- the Well World series is much larger
than a trilogy (how much larger, I don't know; I haven't read any
of Jack Chalker's work -- he wrote the Well World books).
Boskone if an annual SF convention -- it used to be held in Boston,
now it's held in Springfield. MA.
I have no idea about scorched earth whimsey.
andrew
|
1040.38 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | Northern Exposure? | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:18 | 1 |
| re.36 Lynne, you find that job, give me a call ;-)
|
1040.39 | Boss' nephew has that one sewed up... | TALLIS::PARADIS | Music, Sex, and Cookies | Fri Sep 27 1991 13:42 | 24 |
| Re: .36
Actually, I've often used something like that as a brush-off
line when headhunters cold-call me: "Well, if you can find
me a seven-figure V.P. job where I don't have to do anything,
then we'll talk!"
On another note: For April Fool's day this year, I posted a
camped-up version of my resume to the USENET group "misc.jobs.resumes".
It started out:
"Employment objective: Seeking a thoroughly unchallenging
position with minimal performance requirements and maximum
material benefits"
and went downhill from there.
Would you believe that I actually got calls on it? No, not offering
the position mentioned above, but rather noticing that I had put the
magic words "UNIX internals" on it and would I please-oh-please
think of working for them anyway....
--jim
|
1040.40 | mavra chang, i love ya! | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Mon Sep 30 1991 12:16 | 8 |
| A new well-world book? I'm so happy! (Althoughif he's writing it just
for the money, probably won't be very good.)
Lorna, the Well World series is an sf series that is (currently) 5
books long. Or, more acurately, it is two books followed by a
trilogy.
D!
|