T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1019.1 | | JENEVR::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Thu Sep 05 1991 17:50 | 13 |
| Oooh, etiquette question! Where's my Miss Manners?
The big question is whether they are in a "committed" relationship.
Spouse and fiance are definitely committed. I think living together
would count as committed. Seeing each other doesn't count.
If there is a committed relationship, the partner should be included as
a matter of etiquette. Otherwise, the partner can be included if the
hosts decide that people can bring dates. If dates aren't allowed, the
uncommitted partner has no "right" to attend.
This question usually comes up at weddings, where everyone is ready to
fight over every little nitpicky point.
|
1019.2 | | COOKIE::LENNARD | Rush Limbaugh, I Luv Ya Guy | Thu Sep 05 1991 18:03 | 4 |
| After only a year, it's probably way too soon. Also, to me it would
make a big difference whether they were divorced or just separated.
Children of the original marriage will find it a strain after 10 years.
|
1019.3 | | CALS::MALING | Where there's a will there's a wall | Thu Sep 05 1991 18:03 | 22 |
|
>My question is is there some kind of etiquette where you don't bring
>the girlfriend along or would you say he just doesn't want her to be a
>"real" part of his life
It may not be a matter of etiquette, but I wouldn't conclude that he
doesn't want her to be a real part of his life. It's possible that
his family (for any number of reasons) may disapprove of him bringing
her along. So he may be avoiding family conflict by not bringing her.
And I'm sure there could be other explanations as well.
>I think she should be going with him to these things - she
>doesn't have to go to all of them but she doesn't listen
>to me. What do you think?
I think what you mean is that she doesn't *agree* with you. (It's
just one of my pet peeves, but I hate it when someone accuses me
of not listening, when I disagree with or choose not to follow
their advice.) I think its good for you to offer her your advice,
but its her call.
Mary
|
1019.4 | Manners, indeed! | SMURF::CALIPH::binder | Sine titulo | Fri Sep 06 1991 09:49 | 13 |
| If the man is "separated" as opposed to "divorced," he is still legally
*married* to his separated wife. He is not legally free to form a
committed, marriage-type relationship with another woman because the
implication of separation is that there is a chance for rapprochement.
It seems to me that it could be a serious shot in the teeth to his legal
family and friends to see him show up at functions with a woman. "Hey,
folks, I'm still married, but here's my future wife all shiny and ready
to drop into place after I get unhitched."
Tacky, tacky...
-d
|
1019.5 | | MEWVAX::AUGUSTINE | Purple power! | Fri Sep 06 1991 10:06 | 9 |
| You asked what we think. My opinion is that your sister needs to
live her own life and make her own path with her sweetie. It's quite
possible that what makes her happy is different from what makes you
happy and only she can judge that for her own life. I'm willing to
bet that the best thing you can do is give your sister lots of love
and good wishes.
Liz
|
1019.6 | | BLUMON::GUGEL | marriage:nothing down,lifetime to pay | Fri Sep 06 1991 10:52 | 13 |
|
I strongly agree with Liz. You've told her what you think,
now let her decide. She's a "big girl" now. Why does this
worry *you* so much, anyway? It's *her* life! Let me make a
wild-ass guess - you're her *older* sister!
I'll suggest that maybe she doesn't want to go to these things.
My husband *really* doesn't like family functions (his own
family as well as mine). He likes people in ones and twos,
mainly. With my family, it's always a big party. He comes
sometimes because he knows he has to to maintain domestic
harmony. Other times, I go by myself which is fine.
|
1019.7 | clarification | TLE::TLE::D_CARROLL | A woman full of fire | Fri Sep 06 1991 11:03 | 27 |
| This is an anonymous reply from the author of the basenote.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
To clarify a little ...
They have been seeing each other exclusivey for over 1 year. They
were friends for a long time before that. He is constantly going
to all these family things and when the holidays come, she is left
out in the cold. My understanding is it is his choice as I have
talked to several of his relatives who asked me why he never brings her
to anything. On Labor Day it was "I have a cookout to go to
with all the family and relatives and I'll stop by later tonight"
His 2 children are over 18 and he has been separated for 3 1/2 years.
She is very upset about this and feels all kinds of things like
maybe he is ashamed of her (thats what sets me off). I think
its unfair to her.
The first few notes seemed to say that she should'nt expect to take
part in anything.
I honestly cant belive that when Christmas comes around and he goes
over to drop off his gifts with his family and they ask him if he
would like to stay for a short time for a little Christmas cheer
that he would not be able to stay because he has my sister waiting
out in the car.
|
1019.8 | | CUPMK::CASSIN | Nothing sticks to Teflon | Fri Sep 06 1991 11:05 | 15 |
| I think the issue is between your sister and her SO. If it's bothering
her that she's not invited to family functions he attends she should talk
to her SO about it. If her SO has an understanding with his family that
he won't bring any new partner to family functions, he should communicate
that to your sister (especially if she asks why she's not invited!).
I feel when any commitment-based relationship ends that it's up to the
people directly involved to set their own definition of what's "right"
(and that definition can change with time). I don't think this guy
should sign up for never being able to bring a new partner to a family
function, but if the wound is still new for him, or if he still has hope
of reconciling with his wife, I can understand why he's not ready to
introduce a new partner.
-Janice
|
1019.9 | I've been there! | HAMPS::HAWKINS_B | | Fri Sep 06 1991 11:13 | 22 |
| I can relate to this situation.
I lived with my husband for quite a while before we married earlier
this year.
His children found it difficult to accept me as his partner (I think
they always hoped he and mother would get back together again).
Anyway, when they visited, I always went out for the day. It was what
he and they wanted - not me. After a while I thought "to hell with
this" this is my home, they come, they take me. The first time they
arrived they were a little taken aback, but didn't make a fuss and now,
a few years later, we're all good friends. They didn't like me because
they didn't know me. I'm now even nanny to one of the daughers babies!
His ex-wife went mad when she knew I'd been were her children - but she
had to get used to the idea.
If your sister's happy not to go fine, but if she wants to be a bigger
part in his life it looks like she'll have to make a stand. Do they
live together? Why isn't he getting a divorce? I suppose the answer
to those questions could affect this situation. But, its HER problem
and she'll have to work it out - just be there if she needs you
|
1019.10 | MHO | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Lynne Mandile a.k.a. HRH | Fri Sep 06 1991 11:50 | 5 |
| Separated - No, she shouldn't go...
Divorced - She should go...and be invited
HRH
|
1019.11 | my .02 | CARTUN::NOONAN | Day 9 - Hug-hopes dwindling | Fri Sep 06 1991 12:46 | 10 |
| Well, *I* was separated for a long time. During that time I lived with
someone; he was invited to *every* family outing, or I didn't go. Now
I am living with someone else, and *he* is invited. Of course, there's
not much of a family to have outings with anymore, but that's a
different story.
Now, of course, I am waiting for my divorce to be finalized. So I
guess I am still separated.
E Grace, the hug denying floozy
|
1019.12 | Relationships are important, not the legality of the union | HAMPS::MANSFIELD_S | An English Sarah | Fri Sep 06 1991 13:04 | 22 |
|
re .4
-d, surely the important thing is the status of the relationship
between the seperated couple, rather than the legal position. I met
Steve (who is now my husband) when he was seperated from his wife & had
been for 1-2 years (I can't remember exactly how long it is, which
actually shows the lack of importance that I place on it). But although
he was legally married, he had been living alone in his own flat for
over a year, had dated one or two other women - I certainly never felt
I was going out with a *married* man. I can't remember when I started
going along to family dos etc - but it all seemed perfectly natural as
far as I can remember.
re. the basenoters notes - I think it really depends on how the people
concerned feel & what is important to them. If your sister is not happy
with the situation then that is a problem & I guess I would encourage
her to try & do something about it, but it is her decision. If she
doesn't mind, I don't think it's a problem.
Sarah.
|
1019.13 | make that .04 | KAHALA::CAMPBELL_K | She's laughing inside | Fri Sep 06 1991 13:05 | 9 |
| E. Hug-denying? Yes. floozy? Never.
Glad you put that .02 in. I have been separated for 2 years; I have
dated since 6 mos after separation. I can't afford the lousy $700.
retainer a lawyer wants yet. That's not gonna stop me from dating,
and if that someone special comes along (and i think he has arrived)
he's going to all family outings, birthdays, parties, Holidays.
Kim
|
1019.14 | | CUPMK::CASSIN | Nothing sticks to Teflon | Fri Sep 06 1991 13:18 | 13 |
| Thanks for the additional info, anon.
If your sister isn't happy with the way things are, she needs to change
them. The thing she needs to keep in mind is she can't control the
behavior of her SO. She can accept things the way they are, work with
him to see if he wants to change them, or move on. (If it were me, and
he wouldn't change the way things are, I'd move on.)
No one can control any one else's feelings or behavior. Can you tell
I've been doing a lot of reading/development with co-dependency issues
lately? ;-)
-Janice
|
1019.15 | | JENEVR::CHELSEA | Mostly harmless. | Fri Sep 06 1991 20:03 | 9 |
| Re: .7
>The first few notes seemed to say that she should'nt expect to take
>part in anything.
Well, that's not what I meant. There's no etiquette law that says she
_has_ to be invited. However, there's also no etiquette law that says
she _has_ to be excluded. If it's okay with his family, then there
shouldn't be any etiquette problem in him bringing her along.
|
1019.16 | | CALS::MALING | Where there's a will there's a wall | Mon Sep 09 1991 11:53 | 18 |
| >She is very upset about this and feels all kinds of things like
>maybe he is ashamed of her (thats what sets me off).
Anon,
Thanks for clarifying in .7 When I read .0 I didn't get any
indication of your *sister* being upset - just that *you* were upset.
Since your sister is upset by it, I think your sister would feel
better if she talked with him about her feelings. It's causing some
conflict in their relationship and they need to reslove it. Every
relationship has to develop some method of resolving conflicts or
it won't last. Avoiding the issue won't make it go away.
Of course your sister may choose not to do anything about it, in which
case there's nothing you can do except give her your love and support.
Mary
|
1019.17 | | TINCUP::XAIPE::KOLBE | The Debutante Deranged | Tue Sep 10 1991 20:07 | 7 |
| I know *I* would feel left out and undervalued. Is he ashamed of her or what?
I've been dating my SO for 5 months now. I've met his parents, his kids and
his ex. On Sunday we were at a wedding with his ex and her new husband. But we
got a lot of strange looks as his youngest son went back and forth between the
two couples talking to mommy in one and daddy in the other. He also proudly
announced to those who were listening that his mommy and daddy weren't married
to each other. Ah, the new social order. :*) liesl
|