T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
1000.1 | | USWRSL::SHORTT_LA | Touch Too Much | Mon Aug 26 1991 18:58 | 8 |
| >What does the person get out of the style they adopt?
Exactly what they deserve.
L.J.
|
1000.2 | Open the door, and let em in..... | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Her Royal Highness | Tue Aug 27 1991 14:30 | 7 |
| >Close knit group.....
a.k.a. a clique?
HRH
|
1000.3 | only my view, of course | CARTUN::NOONAN | Hot coffee.... | Tue Aug 27 1991 14:48 | 6 |
| I don't think that a group that has knitted a fabric from bits of
concern, fun and conflict is necessarily a clique. I do believe that
all are welcome to add their fabric. Mainly we just ask that they do
it without shredding someone else's fabric.
E Grace
|
1000.4 | | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Her Royal Highness | Tue Aug 27 1991 15:47 | 6 |
| Well, the "new bits of fabric" are still on the outside,
looking in, rather than being accepted into the middle
of the design. Not just here in =wn=, tho', but in many of
the other notesfiles, too...
HRH
|
1000.5 | | CARTUN::NOONAN | Hot coffee.... | Tue Aug 27 1991 16:14 | 25 |
| HRH,
I think you have said you are coming to the party for David Wales. I
hope you do. I found it was so much easier for me to understand notes
that were written by someone whose speaking voice I had heard. I used
to think that the people in this file just thought of me as some little
bit of fluff, good for writing hugs and little else. I found that was
not true when I met people in the flesh.
Oh, I'm sure there *are* some people who think that of me. No one will
like or respect everyone. I just think it becomes easier when we see
each other. We are, after all, more attuned to nuances in body
language and vocal intonation then we are to the written word. At
least, I beieve that to be so.
I know that many of us will never have a chance to meet another noter,
and that we should really find a way to communicate more clearly and
calmly with the written word. But as has been stated in here many
times, electronic communication is *still* a difficult means of
communicating.
I don't know if this addressed the issues of which you spoke or not; I
hope it did.
E Grace
|
1000.6 | | HANCOK::HANCOK::D_CARROLL | A woman full of fire | Tue Aug 27 1991 16:22 | 18 |
| We are, after all, more attuned to nuances in body
language and vocal intonation then we are to the written word. At
least, I beieve that to be so.
Yes, according to a class I took called "How to Listen Powerfully",
only 7% of the communication between two people while talking is in the
actual content of the words. Some 35% is in tone, and the remainder in
body and facial language.
Not sure how they arrived at those statistics, but it jibes with my own
observations.
I think the feeling of cliqueiness/agendas/whatever might come from the
fact that those of us who've met eachother and hang out together
understand eachother better. It's much harder to flame someone you
just had dinner with.
D!
|
1000.7 | | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Her Royal Highness | Wed Aug 28 1991 10:27 | 23 |
| E-
No, your .5 isn't what I am talking about....
But it is a good point....to be judged by the way
you enter a message, i.e. misspelled words, lack
of punctuation, your opinions...is another can of
worms...
I know many read-only noters are R-O because of the
cliquey <= (is there such a word?) atmosphere, and
the feeling that they are not welcome, or are made to
feel that they don't belong, and are being firmly forced
out of that particular notesfile. Rather than there being
an "open arms"/"come on in, the water's fine" in here and
other notesfiles, people are given the "closed door in the
face" impression.
BTW, you were one of the few who took the time to send me
a personal welcome....if that's the kind of fluff you are
made of, I hope it increases 100 fold! (-;
HRH
|
1000.8 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | tangled up | Wed Aug 28 1991 11:10 | 17 |
| well my fabric has velcro sewn on, it sticks to whatever it touches.
I have felt in the past that 'mainstream feminism', mainly as portrayed
and/or projected in the mass media, has IN PART ignored my needs, and
disdained some of my choices, while exalting others of my choices.
Part of why I'm here (in =wn=, and in life) is to make the range of
choices available to me, and to all women, and to all people, wider.
To make them as wide as possible.
I don't agree with everyone in =wn=. I don't even like everyone in
=wn=. But I try, not always with complete success, to be open to most
all views and opinions, and not to slap someone down merely for
disagreeing with me. They've gotten to where they are by their own
path, not mine.
Sara
|
1000.9 | | WMOIS::REINKE_B | bread and roses | Wed Aug 28 1991 11:30 | 33 |
| HRH
4 1/2 years ago, before the first =wn= party, few of us knew
each other. As the years have gone by, and more and more =wn=
have had a chance to meet and socialize and party together,
friendships have grown up. This is a normal and natural occurance.
New noters who go to parties come away as with friends. So I'd
encourage anyone who can do so, to make some of the social events,
they really contribute to a sense of belonging and of understanding
the other noters.
It is true that there are some very out spoken women who have been
writing in the file for a long time. A new noter who writes in
a fashion that an articulate noter disagrees with can be quite
startled by the response. Especially since women do not normally
argue quite so vigorously.
There are various methods developed by the file moderators to
make things easier for those who want to write but have a problem
with argressive replies. Two of these are the Sensitive Replies
Only notes and anonymous postings.
I'd strongly encourage someone who is nervous about expressing
a dissenting opinion to use either of the above methods.
There is no file party line. Particular points of view many dominate
the file because women/men who hold those points of view write here. Other
points of view are neglected because women/men who hold them don't write
here. It is really the responsibility of the individual to be sure that
their thoughts are expressed, if they are complaining that their point
of view is not represented.
Bonnie
|
1000.10 | No agenda...just kicking around...is one needed? | CSCMA::BARBER_MINGO | Exclusivity | Wed Aug 28 1991 13:01 | 24 |
| Well,
I first came here because 'Ren and Bonnie were here...and they
were very cool. 'Ren for now is gone. Bonnie got displeased with
some things that I posted. I think she thought I wasn't being
constructive. Kinda puts a damper on my original reasons.
For now..there are some great thoughts, and some good minds out there.
I guess I like to note with them.
Several enforce some of the concepts my Mom used to have for me.
That feels good. However, I wish Mom and you guys included would
get off of the spelling kick. You know what I mean (at least most
of the time), why nit pick? It is kind of like judging someone
on the basis of their appearance. Not that some of you don't
(If I can take some of the fat digs seriously), that doesn't make
it cool.[But I digress..]
In short, there is good stuff, from women who have gone through
the gamut of things before, that I can learn from.
I like that.
Cindi
|
1000.11 | | WMOIS::REINKE_B | bread and roses | Wed Aug 28 1991 13:08 | 7 |
| Hi Cindi,
I'm awfully glad you stayed.
:-)
Bonnie
|
1000.12 | Explanation, please | RDGENG::LIBRARY | unconventional conventionalist | Wed Aug 28 1991 13:20 | 4 |
| I, personally, don't know what anyone means by an "agenda" - maybe it's
an American way of saying something?
Alice T.
|
1000.13 | don't mind me, I'll sit in the dark ... 8^} | MEMIT::JOHNSTON | bean sidhe | Wed Aug 28 1991 13:39 | 42 |
| My agenda here are numerous, an ever expanding and contracting list;
but they all seem to boil down to a couple of very simple ageda:
1 - I want women to determine the course of their own lives. I believe
that women have the intelligence, the strength and the commitment
to choose for themselves within the context of their selves, their
lives, their loved ones.
2 - I want women's choices to respected -- by other women, by men, by
their parents and children. This respect does not betoken
approval or partisanship, but respects that woman have the
intelligence ... [see above]
My motives for participating here are also numerous. For all the heat
and fireworks that frequently ensue, I feel that here is a place that I
have _less_ need to explain myself. Although there are many kinds of
women, there appears to be a common thread that carries across cultures
and economic boundaries. I like that.
I meet many interesting people here. I enjoy interesting people, even
those with whom I disagree.
I find out about _so_ many things here that give me outlets or pathways
to meeting my agenda. That's wonderful, because sometimes the search
is hard.
But then I also find sadnesss here. I often feel invisible [as a
woman, not as a moderator]. I feel that my voice is one that is not
often heard. I feel that I shall remain the perpetual outsider here in
=wn= ... a dull and boring mezzo in a choir of soaring voices.
I highly recommend meeting =wn=ers in person. I don't feel invisible
when I'm with =wn=ers in the flesh -- I didn't even feel invisible when
I attended my first gathering, walking all alone into a room full of
~40 women I'd never laid eyes on!
I cannot say for sure, but venture to guess that many here who have met
me find me to a bit more animated than my noting persona. [At least
they don't yawn in my presence ... can't say what happens on the drive
home ... maybe they yawm then]
Annie
|
1000.14 | | CARTUN::NOONAN | hug slave | Wed Aug 28 1991 14:25 | 7 |
| Annie! A dull and boring mezzo?! No one with a straw up their nose,
who needs to be scraped of the wall of their cube when the phone rings,
could *ever* be considered dull and boring!
Besides, you're so huggable!
E Grace
|
1000.15 | | CARTUN::NOONAN | hug slave | Wed Aug 28 1991 14:51 | 5 |
| Sorry, Annie. I realized that that last reply sort of dimunitized you
in a way that I know *I* hate. You are also smart, interesting,
intriguing, witty and tough.
E Grace
|
1000.16 | | BOMBE::HEATHER | I collect hearts | Wed Aug 28 1991 14:52 | 6 |
| Ahhhh E, but the picture it painted was priceless! ;-) ;-)
(with absolutely *no* intention of making Annie feel badly or
annoyed with me!)
-HA
|
1000.17 | 8 ^ } | MEMIT::JOHNSTON | bean sidhe | Wed Aug 28 1991 15:10 | 6 |
| no, E, I didn't feel diminished.
but I _was_ going to respond that I have a Puffalump who's very
huggable, but it doesn't have much to say for itself ...
Annie
|
1000.18 | Coolness | CSCMA::BARBER_MINGO | Exclusivity | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:00 | 14 |
| Bonnie...
Actually...
Me too....
.....
Uh oh...
...I had better stop now...
I feel a hug type thing comming on...
and that is not like me.
Deep Like,
Cindi
|
1000.19 | | WMOIS::REINKE_B | bread and roses | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:01 | 7 |
| Hugs Cindi
one of these days I'm going to have to actually meet you!
:-)
Bonnie
|
1000.20 | Awww, go ahead Cindi! Just give in to it! (*8 | CARTUN::NOONAN | hug slave | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:17 | 1 |
|
|
1000.21 | darling? Can I speak now? ;-) ;-) | HANCOK::HANCOK::D_CARROLL | A woman full of fire | Wed Aug 28 1991 16:36 | 9 |
| Hugs Cindi
one of these days I'm going to have to actually meet you!
let me tell ya, I was sure shocked as all get-out.
Mrs. Bates is NOTHING like her noting persona...
D!
|
1000.22 | Dear ... is it all right for me to be a Feminist? | CSCMA::BARBER_MINGO | Exclusivity | Wed Aug 28 1991 17:39 | 21 |
| Re .21-
;-> ;-> ;->-----
Mrs. Bates can not answer you now.
Although by some possibly cosmic coincidence...
Mr. Prosper Alvin Bates is here in my cube today....
He is not, however, allowed to read DEC notes files, I forbid it,
even over the shoulder... so he can not tell me it is ok.
;-> ;-> ;->-----
;-> ;-> ;->-----
;-> ;-> ;->-----
THAT was DEFINATELY coolness.
Deep deep like,
But still repressed,
Cindi
|
1000.23 | go! Cindi, Go! Cindi!!!!! | CARTUN::NOONAN | hug slave | Wed Aug 28 1991 17:43 | 6 |
| Now, now, Cindi, one shouldn't repress these urges! It just isn't
healthy! Why not just let out a little one? It's easy, and it really
won't hurt.
E Grace
|
1000.24 | Excuse me... | CSCMA::BARBER_MINGO | Exclusivity | Wed Aug 28 1991 17:44 | 6 |
| Correction....
Mr. Prosper Alan Bates Esq. ( Solicitor )
signed...
Mrs. Bates
|
1000.25 | don't worry, you aren't going crazy | HANCOK::HANCOK::D_CARROLL | A woman full of fire | Wed Aug 28 1991 17:45 | 4 |
| In case you all are confused about the Bates stuff...well, never mind,
it's not worth it to explain.
D!
|
1000.26 | Opening.. A little (But I digress?) | CSCMA::BARBER_MINGO | Exclusivity | Wed Aug 28 1991 17:47 | 17 |
| Re .23---
Well...
ok...
maybe not hugs quite...
I mean... I married ERB-M for his hugging abilities.
But...
lots and lots of warm, fuzzy, pleasant, comforting feelings...
That is as close as I go.
...but I am not a tease...
Really!
DEFINITE deep deep like,
Cindi
|