T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
948.1 | Cooper's droop | SMURF::CALIPH::binder | Simplicitas gratia simplicitatis | Wed Jul 31 1991 11:31 | 10 |
| The breast tissue is supported partially by a set of ligaments called
Cooper's ligaments. Breasts that are unsupported, especially those that
are larger or are allowed to jounce severely when a woman is running
without proper support, tend to droop (sag) more nd sooner than very
small breasts or breasts that are supported by a bra (ordinary or
athletic, as appropriate).
This phenomenon is referred to as Cooper's droop.
-d
|
948.2 | Thanks!! | RDGENG::LIBRARY | A wild and an untamed thing | Wed Jul 31 1991 12:48 | 9 |
| Thanks for the info., -d, but tell me, does that "droop" actually
matter, physically? I realise it may do cosmetically.
Also, if anyone is sure I need a bra, can they recommend a brand or
style that will help _and_ be comfortable. I thought maybe one of the
new wide-strapped styles would hold the weight better, but they all
seem designed for small sizes.
Alice T.
|
948.3 | A short commercial | THEBAY::COLBIN::EVANS | One-wheel drivin' | Wed Jul 31 1991 13:58 | 6 |
| Decent Exposures, in Washington state, makes comfortable, cotton
bras in a variety of colors, up to size (I think this is close) 58 and
HH. If it doesn't fit properly when you receive it, they alter it for
you free. You can have it altered again later for a nominal charge.
Back to our regularly-scheduled discussion.
|
948.4 | IMHO | THEBAY::COLBIN::EVANS | One-wheel drivin' | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:04 | 12 |
| Personal note: I always look askance at arguments about how bad it is
for women's breasts to do basically anything but be "torpedo t*ts".
(Watch old Perry Mason reruns for the full effect on TV actresses.)
It's kind of like when they told you to not to do athletics because
you'd harm your ovaries. (This from men whose analogous parts couldn't
be less protected by their bodies if they were attached to the nose, or
something.) It's quite easy for the male "medical" establishment to set
up and "prove" a standard that has more to do with male sexual fantasy
than women's comfort.
--DE
|
948.5 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | feet of clay | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:06 | 7 |
| well when I went shopping for (er) foundation garmets :-) a few weeks
ago (in Marshalls), I found a severe dearth of actual functional and
comfortable items. The functional ones (ie, underwires) have always
been very uncomfortable to me, and there simply were no, um,
unaugmented (unpadded :-) comfortable bras available. Since I shop for
clothes rarely, and for lingerie even less often, I compromised... but
went for comfort.
|
948.6 | Get thee to a bra-fittery :-) | CADSE::FOX | No crime. And lots of fat, happy women | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:16 | 19 |
|
I don't know anything about whether "Cooper's Droop" has negative
physiological consequences (<>does bad things to you ;-); personally,
I get backaches if I go braless for too long.
If you decide that you want to find a comfortable bra that fits, I recommend
you go to a store that specializes in um, er, "foundation garments," as it's
more likely that there will be a wider selection, and those speciality shops
cater to the non "32-36 ABC" crowd.
I don't know where you're located. Here in the Boston area, there's
a chain called Lady Grace, where the women who staff them *actually
know how to fit you for a bra*. Some of them are so good, that they
can tell me (accurately) what my size is just by looking at me. I don't find
their prices to be out of line for well-made bras; in fact, their prices beat
out the discount houses for pre-teen models (yes, my daughter's turning into
a teenager :-( :-)
Bobbi "gee I'm glad the deadline passed for corset wearing:-)" Fox
|
948.7 | 'Tis your call, Alice | SMURF::CALIPH::binder | Simplicitas gratia simplicitatis | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:45 | 10 |
| Unfortunately, Decent Exposures isn't readily accessible to Alice, who
is located in Reading, England. :-(
Alice, if Cooper's droop is not a psychological handicap for you, and if
it is not a physical discomfort, then I see no reason for you to conform
to someone else's idea of what you should look like. If part of your
needs is a desire to be attractive to a MOTAS who would prefer that you
wear a bra, then that, too, is your choice.
-d
|
948.8 | Cooper's Droop scoop poop | CUPMK::SLOANE | Is communcation the key? | Wed Jul 31 1991 14:57 | 12 |
| Other things being equal (which they often are not) whether or not a women is
prone to Cooper's Droop depends a lot on heredity. Take a look at the older
women in your family. If they do not droop, chances are you probably will not,
either.
Really! I remember reading this in a magazine in a doctor's waiting room. (They
didn't use the term Copper's Droop, however.)
May you inherit strong ligaments.
Bruce
|
948.9 | | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Donate my body to Science..fiction | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:03 | 14 |
| The only thing I don't like about going "free", is the
look of the, er, gee, I don't quite know how to say this
delicately.....When you get cold or the friction of the
cloth rubbing your breasts makes the "You knows" come
to attention. B-)
It takes away from the nice lines of clothing the models
model for you, to see these two nubs sticking through
what would otherwise be a sleek, smoothly flowing blouse
or whatever.
It is uncomfortable for me to go too long without one,
but I do like to once in awhile....
|
948.10 | rockets to the moon | TORREY::BROWN_RO | invalid note specification | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:22 | 7 |
| This might be an apocryphal story, but, I heard somewhere that
the uplifting bra shape was designed by Howard Hughes for Jane Russell
in his film "The Outlaw" as he felt she drooped too much.
As he was an aircraft engineer, the resulting profile is not
surprising.
|
948.11 | Decent Exposures is only mail-order. SLow, but do-able. | THEBAY::COLBIN::EVANS | One-wheel drivin' | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:31 | 1 |
|
|
948.12 | why are we squeamish to talk about our bodies? | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:40 | 7 |
| When you get cold or the friction of the
cloth rubbing your breasts makes the "You knows" come
to attention.
You wouldn't be refering to NIPPLES, would you?
D!
|
948.13 | | SMURF::CALIPH::binder | Simplicitas gratia simplicitatis | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:44 | 6 |
| YRH,
In addition to ruining the appearance of your smoothly-flowing line,
erect nipples also cause a great many men to think *thoughts*. :-)
-d
|
948.14 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | feet of clay | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:47 | 12 |
| hahahahahahahaha!!!!!
I just remembered this semi-formal family affair I got dragged to as a
teen, in '68 or so. I REFUSED flat out to wear a bra. My mother tried
to convince me to wear those little circular band-aids over 'em.
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hoo ha. that was funny!
|
948.15 | | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:52 | 5 |
| Why was that funny?
I've heard that is a common thing to wear band aids to smooth out
the contour... when going braless, it is a common practice among
college girls. I've never gave it a second thought.
|
948.16 | Weather forecasters... | MISERY::WARD_FR | Going HOME---as an Adventurer! | Wed Jul 31 1991 15:59 | 14 |
| re: last few
I have a friend (a woman) who owns a very expensive motor
home and rents it out to film crews, etc. (for commercials, movies,
etc.) and told me that one day the director was upset because
of the cold and asked if she had band-aids on board. (The
commercial being filmed was supposed to reflect summertime...and
as anyone who has been near San Francisco in the summer knows,
it's nearly always winter in San Francisco. ;-) ) The band-aids
were necessary to cover the erect nipples of the women being filmed,
in case this wasn't obvious. Sometimes nature is just too natural.
Frederick
|
948.17 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | feet of clay | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:07 | 4 |
| well this was in '68 remember, when it was scandalous for a girl (I was
16 or so) to have her nipples showing through her dress. I was
supposed to be wearing a bra, not for support (which I certainly didn't
need!) but for DECENCY's sake. I thought that was silly.
|
948.18 | Who invented that thing anyhow? | CSC32::K_KINNEY | Take a liking to a Viking | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:18 | 11 |
|
Soo, not to derail this discussion, but does anyone here
perchance know WHO invented the bra anyhow? Has anyone
here (besides me cause I have a terrible time with these
things) considered "re-engineering" the design to make
it more comfy?
curiously,
kim
|
948.19 | | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:34 | 16 |
| Didn't Life magazine have the entire history a year or so ago? Or was
it just a photo opportunity?
>Has anyone considered re-engineering the design to make it more comfy?
Since when has woman's comfort been of any great importance? Now if
you're talking about women's appearance, there's lots and lots of work
going on! We got your lace, we got your neoprene, we got your lycra, we
got your seed pearls here, we got your underwire, we got your front closure,
we got your padding here, we got your shirring, we got your teddy, we
got your tap pants, we got your bodystocking, we got your camisole...
Comfort? Huh? What's that? As Dorian once said, we're talking the
big PM, here! (pleasing men)
S.
|
948.20 | String 'm up by the straps! | THEBAY::COLBIN::EVANS | One-wheel drivin' | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:34 | 6 |
| I dunno who invented the bloody thing, but places like DEcent Exposures
and other manufacturers who make 100% cotton bras (along the lines of
"Jogbra" and friends - more or less support, depending on your needs)
have already begun the redesign process...
|
948.21 | notes colision with .19 | WMOIS::REINKE_B | bread and roses | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:34 | 10 |
| Kim
A number of people claim to have invented the bra. In the rather
(in)famous article on the anniversary of the bra put out by Life
magazine they picked the woman who they felt was the most likely
candidate. I don't recall much about her, except that she apparently
made the first one out of handkerchives and ribbons. Does anyone
rember that article better than I do?
Bonnie
|
948.22 | | CUPMK::SLOANE | Is communcation the key? | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:45 | 3 |
| I hope if you use band aids you use the ouchless kind.
Bruce
|
948.23 | | ASIC::BARTOO | RoboCo-op | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:47 | 4 |
|
Why? There's no hair there.
|
948.24 | | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:53 | 3 |
| re: -1 Maybe not according to Playboy...
S.
|
948.25 | no way | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | out in the cold | Wed Jul 31 1991 16:58 | 4 |
| re .24, *Really*, Sandy? :-)
Lorna
|
948.26 | | SA1794::CHARBONND | Guttersnipes, Inc. | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:03 | 1 |
| somebody want to enlighten the child?
|
948.27 | | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:18 | 7 |
| He could enlighten himself if he wanted to. But the fantasy is always
much more fun than actual women. Don't let it get out that women have
pores, too! And that hair grows in their armpits and on their legs...
;^>
S.
|
948.28 | | SMURF::CALIPH::binder | Simplicitas gratia simplicitatis | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:19 | 15 |
| Re: .19
> we got your front closure
Said with a sneer about pleasing men? Sorry on this one, Sandy, but
I must quote good ol' Sportin' Life here, when he said/sang, "It ain't
necessarily so."
I know a woman who, for whatever reason, is incapable of fastening her
bra behind her back. With a back-closure bra, she fastens it around her
tummy with the cups in back, slides it around, and fits it onto her
breasts and shoulders. For this woman, front closure is a dream come
true, evidence of serious redesign that works.
-d
|
948.29 | And I know about the birds and bees, too! | CUPMK::SLOANE | Is communcation the key? | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:21 | 3 |
| Gee, I knew all that already! My mommy gave me a proper education.
Brucie
|
948.30 | | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Donate my body to Science..fiction | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:26 | 12 |
| Well, for one thing, they can make straps that do not
dig a path into your shoulder, or not put plastic adjust
clips that will end up on the shoulder on them. Or put
itchy lace along the cups, or line the cups with itchy
material. They could make those nice matching sets of
bra & underwear in other sizes other that 32AA. I have
yet to see a black bra in my size without an underwire.
Underwires are torture. I like seamless, too. Thick
material for the cups, so the nipples don't come through
the bra.
HRH
|
948.31 | | MCIS1::DHURLEY | Children Learn What They Live | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:39 | 8 |
| I hate bras....I wear t-shirts and they are the most
comfortable.....and I have since stopped being concerned about my nipples
showing.....I wear clothes that I am comfortable in and not wearing
a bra is part of that.....the half t-shirts that you just slip over
your head are great....and probably less expensive than bras.....
denise
|
948.32 | | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:41 | 13 |
| I believe you, -d, and more power to her. But I don't believe that the
design was invented for this purpose. And that's what I'm talking
about - the motives behind the design(s). It is not and never was for
woman's comfort or ease or anything other than men's visual and tactile
pleasure or for men's emotional comfort, (disguised as women's modesty -
something their mothers and sisters can wear), etc. The motives are
men's and women are left to simply choose among the resultant designs.
That some women manage to find comfort in one or more of them is
serendipity. "Sports bras" are a totally recent invention and most
women don't wear them around men. The emphasis is still as it has
always been.
S.
|
948.33 | | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | angry? me? my eyes are shaking... | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:58 | 23 |
| re.30
Speaking as a woman who once had to stuff her 32AA's with old pantyhose
just to fill them, I must challenge her perception that there are 'nice
matching sets of bra & underwear' in that size.
8^} !!!
Why just the other night I was browsing Victoria's Secret [they think
I'm actually 10 women at the same address!] and found that all of the
cute little set thingies came in 32-36 B/C
Now there _were_ lots of nice matching sets of cami's and pants for the
less mounded ... but no brassieres.
Apparently if you don't 'need a bra' Victoria's Secret doesn't really
want your business ... unless of course you've got some gent stashed in
the wings badly in need of silk boxer shorts ...
which reminds me, is Attila now too successful to appear in the
lingerie catalogs anymore? he was nice to look at ...
Annie
|
948.34 | front close for easy use, not easy access | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Wed Jul 31 1991 17:59 | 9 |
| Sandy, for the most part I agree with you, but not on front closure bras.
I fail to see that a front closure bra is more attractive to men (other
than being easier to open). It is of great appeal to women, and I believe
their invention and popularity is due to convenience for women.
I LOVE front close bras!!! I wish it was easier to find them with
underwires.
D!
|
948.35 | | NOATAK::BLAZEK | nature is a language | Wed Jul 31 1991 18:06 | 13 |
|
re: .34 (D!)
> It is of great appeal to women, and I believe their invention
> and popularity is due to convenience for women.
_I'll_ say! =8-)
So perhaps the inventor was a woman who had a desire for more
convenient defrocking mechanisms in use with her partner(s).
Carla
|
948.36 | not a scientific survey ... | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | angry? me? my eyes are shaking... | Wed Jul 31 1991 18:09 | 11 |
| re.32
While I whole-heartedly agree with your general point, front closure
_may_ be the one exception ...
I only say this as the number of men I've heard piss and moan about the
inconvenience of front closure _far_ exceeds those who have mentioned
any benefit in my hearing.
perhaps the one man that mentioned that 'women look more graceful
getting out of them' had an uncle on the design team.
|
948.37 | Busted flat in Baton Rouge, waiting for a train.. | LJOHUB::GONZALEZ | Books, books, and more books! | Wed Jul 31 1991 20:50 | 18 |
| After recent surgery that made one breast very very sore, I took to
wearing a bra all the time because even the slightest jiggle hurt like
h*ll. I lined the cup with a silk scarf to make it both padded and
friction-free. Voila! A very comfortable bra with no "happy-nipple
syndrome".
On the other hand, I frequently go braless, usually do a lot of
exercise to keep the muscles in tone, and still pass the old pencil
test.
Far as I can tell, drooping isn't bad for you, nor is going braless and
the later does not necessarily create the former.
And then there were the good old 60s when braless was PC and "nice
nips" was supposed to be a compliment. Even then I had the ovs to
growl instead of smile. :^)
Margaret
|
948.38 | "high beams" | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | christine | Wed Jul 31 1991 21:33 | 7 |
|
The pencil test!? I'd forgotten about that one.
Hey Laurie, remember having our picture taken on top of old Mondanock?
:-)
CQ
|
948.39 | Huh? | BROKE::BROKE::NALE | The other line moves faster. | Wed Jul 31 1991 22:38 | 4 |
|
Okay. You got me.
What's the pencil test?
|
948.40 | Breasts .nes. Balloons | LRCSNL::WALES | David from Down-under | Wed Jul 31 1991 23:39 | 18 |
| G'Day,
I believe that if you can hold a pencil under your breast (with
your breast and not your hand) then you have failed the test.
Basically if you are large breasted you are supposed to have these two
globes that protrude from your body but do not sag at all. Not really
my idea of good looking breasts. Personally, I think a little sag
enhances the shape of the breast. It seems to acentuate the curves.
As for the original basenote question, I doubt that going braless
is going to cause too much damage even if your breasts do droop a
little. However, I think that if you are very large then you may get
to the point where you are no longer stretching the ligaments and skin
but more likely tearing them. This may cause medical complications.
David. (Who thinks of breasts a lot but never so clinically)
|
948.41 | Night bras? | DUCK::SMITHS2 | | Thu Aug 01 1991 04:24 | 7 |
|
My mum once told me that women with very large breasts should even wear
night bras to stop them from sagging! What a horrible thought! I
suppose if you're pregnant and nursing it might be practical though?
Sam
|
948.42 | hmmm... | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Thu Aug 01 1991 09:30 | 9 |
| It seems to me that the species survived quite a few thousand years
without them. Women do have a longer life expectancy now than they
did before the bra was invented but there is no documented indication
of any cause effect relationship. Now that could be because "the
medical profession does not study female problems" but ...
Oh, hell, just started another rathole...
ed
|
948.43 | another tangent... | IAMOK::MACDOWELL | | Thu Aug 01 1991 10:26 | 10 |
| Re a few back on nursing and night bras...
Although some "older" literature recommends this, the current thinking
is that this is not a good idea, as the bra can put pressure on the
milk ducts, and potentially lead to the development of a breast
infection. If someone does want to wear one anyway (it can help to
minimze leaking), it should be a soft, not much support type, "night
bra."
Susan
|
948.44 | Nah "she" wouldn't know how to run | CSC32::M_EVANS | | Thu Aug 01 1991 11:05 | 9 |
| Running or sports bras are another irritation. Don't the manufacturers
believe that large breasted women are also active? Although I wear
sports bras almost exclusively, it takes three months or so to stretch
them out to where I not smashed in.
My other bitch is with otherwise cotton bras stiched with nylon. Hey
you know some of us have allergies to plastic on our skin.
Meg
|
948.45 | Thanks a million, Ladies!! | RDGENG::LIBRARY | A wild and an untamed thing | Thu Aug 01 1991 11:22 | 22 |
| Thanks for all the answers, Ladies, interesting and amusing.
Re. 3 and 11: You're right, I don't exactly live in walking-distance of
Decent Exposures, but do you have their address?
Re. 7: What does MOTAS mean? Am I ignorant, or just English? (I expect
it's the latter)
Re. 13: I do not believe I am responsible for the thoughts of men who
see me. (My fiance has told me that he does not mind me going braless
in public, though I must admit he showed a little relief when I told
him I'd realised no-one actually looks at me.) I believe the only
person whose actions or thoughts I am responsible for are my own. To a
certain extent, I will change for my fiance (whose name, by the way, is
Garrick, and he's truly amazing - he even seems to know more about PMT
than I do! and _I've_ had problems) - I asked his opinion before I made
my decision to "abstain", but no-one else.
Thanks again, and I look forward to reading more of your input.
Alice T.
|
948.46 | | GUESS::DERAMO | You can't teach an old dog new math. | Thu Aug 01 1991 11:28 | 13 |
| re MOTAS
It's one of a series of acronyms/abbreviations:
MOTAS member of the appropriate sex
MOTOS member of the opposite sex
MOTSS member of the same sex
I'm sure if we thought about it, we could up with
meanings for the other twenty-three letters in the fourth
position....
Dan
|
948.47 | When $ is to be made, companies listen. | LJOHUB::MAXHAM | One big fappy hamily.... | Thu Aug 01 1991 11:35 | 5 |
| How about we women all put our complaints and suggestions about bras
into one letter to a bra manufacturer and everyone sign it and mail
it off? I betcha the suggestions get consideration.
Kathy (who gets even more aggravated by the design of women's shoes)
|
948.48 | | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Thu Aug 01 1991 11:35 | 10 |
| Good question, Annie. Where is Atilla, indeed! "Too famous"? Can get
"too much money" now? I doubt it. "Too sexy" might be better. "Too
thought-provoking" for women. Makes average men "too uncomfortable".
Major no-no. Back to the greasy, short haired men with big noses.
So what if Jill Goodacre makes women uncomfortable? Might just make
them work a little harder, right? Spend a little more money. Be a
little less uppity with average guys. Keep them in their places. Yah,
that's better. But, uh, let's fire Atilla.
S.
|
948.49 | a little teeny rathole | LJOHUB::GONZALEZ | Books, books, and more books! | Thu Aug 01 1991 11:45 | 8 |
| <set_rathole>
Umm, if anyone knows where Atilla is, I'd like to remind you all that
my birthday is coming up soon and um.... gee... I can dream, can't I?
:^) Margaret
<end_rathole>
|
948.50 | | RDGENG::LIBRARY | A wild and an untamed thing | Thu Aug 01 1991 12:57 | 5 |
| Re .47
Yeah, I'll second that!
Alice
|
948.51 | | BOOVX2::MANDILE | Donate my body to Science..fiction | Thu Aug 01 1991 13:39 | 17 |
| Happy-nipple syndrome? giggle, giggle, hahahaha.....
That one tickled my funny bone.....(I must be getting
slap-happy as I'm on vacation as of 4:00 today :-))
Re 32AA
I was only generalizing about the size the matching sets
come in.....but they are still very pretty, sigh.....
Re sports bras - I have tried many, but they do not allow
you to breathe, which is difficult if you are trying to
play soccer or ride a horse.....:-(
HRH
|
948.52 | | JJLIET::JUDY | Born to be wild... | Thu Aug 01 1991 13:41 | 15 |
|
So who's this Attila? Sounds like I'm missing out on
something here! =)
I hate buying bras. I can't wear anything with a lot of
lace or lining. It's gotta be cotton or satin/silk-like.
I'd love to be able to go without one but for me it isn't
logical. I'm small-framed and thin but have a fairly
large chest. And try and buy a strapless that's functional?
HA! that's a joke. Underwires are uncomfortable as all get
out. I too, can't find attractive black bras in my size
that don't have underwire. phooey.
JJ
|
948.53 | | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | christine | Thu Aug 01 1991 14:20 | 8 |
|
Well, I did just buy some at Sears that I like. Simple, front-closure,
seamless, satiny and spandexy, thin straps and band. I think Sears
usually has a good selection but then again, I'm in the average size
range. As for department stores (for those of you in the Marlborough,
Mass. area), I've usually been satisfied with Rich's.
CQ
|
948.54 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | out of darkness, light | Thu Aug 01 1991 14:36 | 10 |
|
re: the topic title.
yes, some of us do.
only it's not just nylon scaffolding,
it's complex, woven, cantilevered, nylon scaffolding.
-Jody
|
948.55 | | OXNARD::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Thu Aug 01 1991 14:46 | 8 |
| By the way, I highly recommend Bali bras. They come in three different breast
SHAPES as well as many many different sizes. I know it sounds a little funny
(ok - maybe a LOT funny) for a man to be recommending bras, but I've been
shopping for bras for Janice for a LOOONG time now - and what with feedback
from her I'm actually pretty damn good at it, and we BOTH agree. They're
comfortable, they support well, and they look good.
-- Charles
|
948.56 | | BOOVX1::MANDILE | Donate my body to Science..fiction | Thu Aug 01 1991 16:19 | 3 |
| But I can't get more than 1 Bali in the size I need!
HRH
|
948.57 | | WMOIS::REINKE_B | bread and roses | Thu Aug 01 1991 16:47 | 8 |
| inre .42
Old women's breast tended to sag and end up around their navels
in the days without bras. I think the question here is do bras
prevent that, or just give the illusion of preventing that.
Bonnie
|
948.58 | minor digression | MEMIT::JOHNSTON | angry? me? my eyes are shaking... | Thu Aug 01 1991 16:49 | 28 |
| set mode/rathole
re. who is Atilla?
how to put this ... he's a professional model in incredible shape with
gorgeous long thick blond hair.
sounds par for the course, right?
wrong.
he's unique, stands out from the crowd ... actually looks happy and
comfortable inside his body and in his surrounding [instead of wooden
and posed]
I've seen in him various catalogs from lingerie to Eddie Bauer
to bedding linens [this! one was something to behold - incredible and
canny marketing] to Spiegel ...
Just one woman's opinion mind you, but he _steamed_ off the pages in a
completely believable fashion no matter what he was wearing or what he
was selling.
Now he's disappeared ...
set mode/back to regular discussion
Annie
|
948.59 | A light goes on! | BSS::VANFLEET | Time for a cool change... | Thu Aug 01 1991 17:04 | 8 |
| OH!!!
I thought you were talking about Attila the Hun!! And then I thought I
must have missed something somewhere or was just incredibly dense!
Thanks for enlightening me!
Nanci
|
948.60 | Atilla the HON! | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Thu Aug 01 1991 17:15 | 14 |
| Make that waist length hair! It isn't just long! Pant, pant.
His face and body are perfect and good description, Annie, he STEAMS off
the pages, comfortable and outrageously sexy - an expectation in men's
mags but rarely seen in anything geared to women.
Ralph Lauren's "farmer joes" and anything in Playgirl are a joke in
comparison. Except for one layout Atilla did in Playgirl around 1984 or
so. I was contracting at this small company and a woman in the office
papered the ladies room with his layout, (like Seka in the men's room
at Ralph's). That's where I saw him first. Gawd. He defies the laws of
geometry. Why aren't there more?
S.
|
948.61 | ... | NOVA::FISHER | Rdb/VMS Dinosaur | Thu Aug 01 1991 17:17 | 2 |
| Heck, I thought it was Attilla the cat in the Mother Goose and Grim
Comics....
|
948.62 | | OXNARD::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Thu Aug 01 1991 17:25 | 8 |
| Re: .56
There's a Bali outlet store out here that has all sorts of sizes. Is the problem
lack of selection where you shop, or just that Bali doesn't make what you need?
If it's the former, I bet you can write them to find a better distributor.
-- Charles
|
948.63 | First one made from 2 JOCK STRAPS? | CSC32::K_KINNEY | Take a liking to a Viking | Thu Aug 01 1991 18:47 | 20 |
|
er..I don't know who this Attilla person is but it
sounds very interesting. However, I have another
tidbit of info about the new sports bras that are
out. I was shopping in a sporting goods store last
night and started checking out those tops that I
see women runners wearing? You know, those stretchy
things that kinda look like bathing suit tops?
Anyhow, there was a label on one introducing the
two women who started that company and developed this
clothing item. They said that the first one they made
was constructed from two JOCK STRAPS that they cut up
and sewed together...I guess those things are soft and
pretty stretchy or something. Anyhow, I thought that was
very creative of them and the product seems to be pretty
popular with the runners here in Colorado Springs.
kim
|
948.64 | stretch | TINCUP::XAIPE::KOLBE | The Debutante Deranged | Thu Aug 01 1991 21:01 | 8 |
| I rarely wear bras but I use tank tops all the time. They are comfortable and
can be anywhere from firm to loose. I especially like them under T-shirts.
I second the comments about underwear that's made with itchy stitching or labels.
Doesn't anybody try these things on before they market them?
And I don't care who they invented it for, LYCRA is a gift from the goddess. I
love under and outer wear made with a bit of LYCRA. liesl
|
948.65 | Addresses, please!! | RDGENG::LIBRARY | A wild and an untamed thing | Fri Aug 02 1991 06:37 | 7 |
| Okay.
Does anyone have the addresses for Decent Exposures _and_ Bali?
Please??
Alice T.
|
948.66 | | MR4DEC::HETRICK | | Fri Aug 02 1991 09:54 | 13 |
| slightly imperfect bali bras, underwear, slips etc can be purchased
through the L'eggs Brands catalog. I don't order the bras, since I
have nothing to support, but I do order the l'eggs, hanes and isotoner
stockings and the imperfections are miniscule and unnoticeable. the
prices are pretty good...I hate paying exhorbitant prices for something
I don't enjoy wearing....
You can call (919) 744-1170 for a catalog or write to:
L'eggs Brands, Inc.
PO Box 748
Rural Hall, NC 27098-0748
Cheryl
|
948.67 | Do they make shoes too? ;-) | LJOHUB::MAXHAM | One big fappy hamily.... | Fri Aug 02 1991 10:30 | 8 |
| re: .63
Fantastic! I wonder how many other woman-owned companies
produce women's bras. Makes perfect sense. Do you have
any idea, Kim, whether this company has a catalog, or does
it only distribute locally.
Kathy
|
948.68 | | SMURF::CALIPH::binder | Simplicitas gratia simplicitatis | Fri Aug 02 1991 11:13 | 5 |
| Re: .67
Decent Exposures is women-owned and -operated, I believe.
-d
|
948.69 | | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | christine | Fri Aug 02 1991 11:16 | 5 |
|
And in 26.15 you'll find the adress and phone number for a company
called Travis Place. Their catalog includes underwear.
CQ
|
948.70 | Don't think there is a catalogue | CSC32::K_KINNEY | Take a liking to a Viking | Fri Aug 02 1991 11:51 | 12 |
|
re: .67
Kathy,
I don't know if they have a catalogue or not. Where
I saw them was in a store owned by GART Brothers
Sporting Goods. Don't remember if they have stores
back East.
kim
|
948.71 | show me Attila! ;-) | RYKO::NANCYB | window shopping | Fri Aug 02 1991 13:51 | 29 |
| re: Kathy Maxham & the petition
If you draft the letter, I'll sign it and even try to track down
the address of a manufacturer or 2!
re: .52 (JJ)
> Underwires are uncomfortable as all get out.
Speaking of underwires...
I read an article somewhere.. (Working Woman?) about women in the
FBI. It portrayed a woman in an investigation position similar
to Jodie Foster's in "Silence of the Lambs".
A case involving a woman's murder was escalated to her team. One
unsolved mystery involved the semi-circular marks under the
woman's breasts. When the female investigator looked at the
pictures, she quickly identified them as underwire marks! This
had escaped all of the investigators before her ;-).
re: Annie and Sandy
About Atilla...
Could either of you *please* save me an ad with him in it!?! ;-)
nancy b.
|
948.72 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | Yes! Yes! Yes! | Fri Aug 02 1991 14:21 | 12 |
| re: Attilla
I have a book of male models called "not just another pretty face".
he's in there. It has casual and model shots of each man, and text
describing their lives (NOT THE USUAL PLAYBOY BIMBO STUFF like "candy
wants to be an actress someday and her favorite sexual foods are
bananas and whipped cream and the thing that turns her on most is men
who use jackhammers and anything with the word "jock" in it!)
I'll bring it to the next fnc I know y'all will be at!
-Jody
|
948.73 | Wherefore art thou Atilla? | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Fri Aug 02 1991 14:42 | 3 |
| Well *I* can't wait to see it!!:-)
D!, with a soft-spot for long-haired men...WOOF!
|
948.74 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | Yes! Yes! Yes! | Fri Aug 02 1991 14:47 | 4 |
| long hair!
double woof.
-Jody
|
948.75 | | JJLIET::JUDY | Born to be wild... | Fri Aug 02 1991 14:48 | 11 |
|
Ditto D! I *think* I know who this Attila is now but
won't know for sure till I see a pic someone has.
Back to our regularly scheduled program....
JJ
|
948.76 | We're talkin' MAJOR rathole... | ASDG::FOSTER | Calico Cat | Fri Aug 02 1991 15:18 | 17 |
|
Rathole alert...
I prefer short hair, meself. But that may be because the only style of
long hair I've ever seen for black men, besides the conked James Brown
look and the radical Don King look, is dred-locks. And those take
gettin' used to.
Or the Milli Vanilli look...
Frankly, I enjoy seeing a guy with waves in his hair after a night with
his "do"-rag on. For those who don't know what a do-rag is, imagine a
dark cloth that drapes in the back and has two loose ends that you pull
to the back to tie it in place, kinda like Arabian sheik garb. When I
see a guy walking down the street in one, I know he's planning to
impress someone that night. And it looks a lot better than a woman in
curlers walking down the street...
|
948.77 | Maybe we need a topic called "Guys"? | MUX::TORNELL | | Fri Aug 02 1991 15:30 | 9 |
| Fab in Milli Vanilli was pretty fine looking, I thought. I didn't care
if he sang or not! 'ren, there's a certain guy in your building who
doesn't seem to take much gettin' used to...
That does it, Jody, let's plan an FWO 'Woof' lunch or happy hour or
something. It's a right of passage, isn't it? And then it will no
longer be sexist when men do it.
Sandy
|
948.78 | | MUX::TORNELL | | Fri Aug 02 1991 15:39 | 10 |
| Mods, if you create a "guys" topic, this goes in it!
Austin Liquors in Worcester has the first ever, (that I've seen),
liquor store ad aimed at women. Shirtless guy in tight jeans, shot from
the back. Nice, too. Life size picture. But they *were* discreet with
such "deviance". It's high up on the left wall, in the back. The
bims-for-boys are right on the floor down in front, smiling and arching
their backs, as usual.
S.
|
948.79 | it gives me a perverse thrill ... | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | angry? me? my eyes are shaking... | Fri Aug 02 1991 15:42 | 15 |
| no, Sandy, I don't think we need a new topic ...
while we've certainly ratholed this one all the way to China, I'm
having the time of my life reading a _woman's_ rathole in a topic about
_women's_ needs in _woman_notes.
I have a condo week coming up soon [all to myself] maybe we should
make it an FWO "Woof" Open House near the mountains and the hot tub.
Right of passage, hell! I don't give a furry rodent's backside if men
have 'woof' responses. I just get pissed when some can't seem to
separate fact from fantasy and expect women in general to look like the
fantasy icons.
Annie
|
948.80 | | WLDKAT::GALLUP | What's your damage, Heather? | Mon Aug 05 1991 11:03 | 19 |
|
One way to reduce "sag" is to work on developing the pec muscles. I've
been one of those people that has never had to worry about sag, for
some reason I just don't. I'm a 36B, but I do notice that the more
time I spend on developing my pec muscles the less gravity seems to
affect them, and the MORE cleavage line I have (this is a good thing).
;-)
RE: Victoria Secret
VS has quite a few lycra and stretch lace bodysuits and camis that work
well for just about every bra size up to, I would think a D or E cup.
They are excellent for flat-chested women as well.
However, you're right, their bras do not cater to the small or large
women...
kath
|
948.81 | love their silk tho... | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Mon Aug 05 1991 12:41 | 10 |
| VS has quite a few lycra and stretch lace bodysuits and camis that work
well for just about every bra size up to, I would think a D or E cup.
Hmmm...I have never found anything at Victoria Secret that fits anything
over a D...I'm a D (I mean my cup size, as well as my name! :-) and have
a lot of trouble finding things there to fit. Unless they are quite loose
one-size-fits-all kind of thing, I usually find bodysuits, undershirts etc
make me feel kind of "squashed".
D!
|
948.82 | | USWRSL::SHORTT_LA | Touch Too Much | Mon Aug 05 1991 12:45 | 8 |
| D!
Try ordering from VS catalog. Their stores do not carry as many
sizes or selections as their catalog does.
L.J.
|
948.83 | Major complaints | ELWOOD::CHRISTIE | | Mon Aug 05 1991 12:47 | 12 |
| Victoria's Secret is great if you are a size 12 or smaller.
Why can't bra manufacturers make a bra that has straps that stay up.
All it takes is moving the straps in the back 1 teeny inch closer
to the hooks. AND why can't they make a decent support bra in
large sizes (38DD). All I can find are the same bras as 32AA only
bigger. NO SUPPORT!!!!
I'm too big and droopy to wear underwire. They hurt. :-(
Linda
|
948.84 | Pert and perky has its advantages! | CARTUN::NOONAN | Ding Dong...Avon calling | Mon Aug 05 1991 12:54 | 8 |
| Linda,
Well, I am certainly not "too big and droopy" to wear underwires, and I
agree, they *hurt*!
I'll go without, thank you very much!
E Grace
|
948.85 | | BOMBE::HEATHER | I collect hearts | Mon Aug 05 1991 13:22 | 7 |
| Gee....I don't find underwires uncomfortable at all.....Maybe I've got
them on backwards! ;-) (Not that it would make a major difference
either way!).....I usually buy underwires because if you don't the
manufacturers seem to have a need to pad them otherwise! I hate
padding! What's wrong with *just* me!
-HA
|
948.86 | | CALS::HEALEY | DTN 297-2426 (was Karen Luby) | Mon Aug 05 1991 13:29 | 23 |
|
RE: Victoria Secret...
I wear a size 8-10 and have to wear a size LARGE in their lingerie
because of my size 36B boobs! Seems kinda strange, I mean, I'm not
busty but I have to wear a large? Recently, even the large in
something I wanted did not fit. I ended up at Fredericks and
could wear medium however.
Re: bras
I hate buying bras! I currently have two bras and am constantly
washing them to wear again the next day. They are wearing out
quite rapidly but I cannot find a new one that fits! My problem
is that I am a size 36B but not a full size. 36A is way too small
but 36B doesn't fit at the nip... I'm pointier than your average
bra wearer I guess. Anybody else have this problem that can
recommend a bra? I prefer no padding or seams, no lace (too itchy).
Front hook is great but I am used to putting the bra on backwards
to hitch, then turning it around so it doesn't bother me much.
Karen
|
948.87 | | WLDKAT::GALLUP | What's your damage, Heather? | Mon Aug 05 1991 13:31 | 10 |
|
RE: .86
Karen.....consider buying a bra that is stretch-lace and underwire.
I have two of the stretch-lace/underwire bras from VS and since they
conform to your own shape, they fit well.
kath
|
948.88 | Herewith: The Address for Decent Exposures! | THEBAY::COLBIN::EVANS | One-wheel drivin' | Mon Aug 05 1991 13:38 | 29 |
| Decent Exposures
2202 NE 115th
Seattle, WA 98125
(206)364-4540 (9am-9pm PDT)
(I coulda sworn I saw an "800" number for them somewhere, but I can't
seem to find it.)
First bra re-make within 1-2 months of purchase is free.
During the first year, they'll do a remake for $7.00 ("should you (or
your bra) change sizes...")
Travis Place and Decent Exposures have similar styles, but D.E. offers
more colors, more fabrics, and a much larger size range. For a
standard, white, cotton bra in average sizes, I imagine either place
would be fine. For Color selection and size range, go with D.E. (also
if you need custom alterations, which D.E. does as a matter of course).
Yes, D.E. is woman-owned-and-operated.
Oh yeah...they offer a cotton knit, and then a cotton velour, which
they say has "more support" - which it does. (I have several knit, and
one velour) They also just introduced a lycra model, for those who want
even more support.
--DE (Dawn Evans)
|
948.89 | Victoria's Secret | RENOIR::STHILAIRE | out in the cold | Mon Aug 05 1991 14:20 | 9 |
| Here's my complaint with Victoria's Secret: Their underpants sizes run
*big*! I bought some size Small underpants there (which is my normal
size) and they are huge and baggy on my rear-end! If that's their idea
of small, well...nevermind.
Although, I think their stuff is very pretty.
Lorna
|
948.90 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | out of darkness, light | Mon Aug 05 1991 14:24 | 11 |
|
I always find the prettiest bras are not available in anything above a
C-cup (particularly with VS, but other places too). And I seldom trust
mail-order things to fit (particularly when it's something as
personal-sized as a bra).
So I usually go to Filene's. They're expensive, but they look good,
they fit, and they last.
-Jody
|
948.91 | | USWRSL::SHORTT_LA | Touch Too Much | Mon Aug 05 1991 15:00 | 11 |
| re:.89
Couldn't agree more. I recently acquired a small thong from them and
the silly thing just about fits under my chin!
Their bra's tend to run small and their panites large...who is the
model for these things anyway? ;^)
L.J.
|
948.92 | Slippage | ELWOOD::CHRISTIE | | Mon Aug 05 1991 15:02 | 11 |
| Victoria's Secret L (10-12) M (6-8) S (2-4).
Anyone have a problem with their bra slipping? Mine are always
sliding down in front so my breasts bunch up on top. I'm constantly
going into the ladies' room to adjust the bra and pull it up.
Doesn't matter which style or mfg. I use. If going braless didn't
make some of my clothes fit odd, I would do it at work as well as
at home.
Linda
|
948.93 | | MR4DEC::HETRICK | | Mon Aug 05 1991 15:19 | 12 |
| re: Victoria's Secret
I just received an order from Victoria's ...my first in about
six months. It seems to me that they have adjusted their sizing
downward. I've been buying their stuff for years and have always
fit comfortably into petites or smalls (I must be a 34AAAAAAAAAA...
no bras for me, thankyou very much, only camisoles,etc). But
everything I bought this time was smaller...camisoles, thongs,etc.
And I bought my SO a pair of boxers, the same size he already has
six or seven pairs of from VS, and they were too small. So, those
of you who can't find stuff small enough to fit you, try again, you
might find they fit now....
|
948.94 | | WLDKAT::GALLUP | What's your damage, Heather? | Mon Aug 05 1991 15:23 | 13 |
|
One might also mention here that every company has different sizing
charts...and also everyone has a unique body type.
What might work WONDERS for one person, might be awful for another.
VS undies, ordered in my "normal" undie's size are too small...I have
to go a size larger with their thongs. ;-)
kat
|
948.95 | | MLTVAX::DUNNE | | Mon Aug 05 1991 16:57 | 8 |
| I buy Sweet Nothings by Maidenform and haven't had to change in
years. I get them at Filene's. They're comfortable, no pads, no
underwire, front closing, and not too expensive. Once in a great while,
they unsnap when they shouldn't. Before I found this brand, I always
had some trouble or other with what I experimented with. I'm not sure
about what sizes they have, as my size is average.
Eileen
|
948.96 | Reading the paper again! | LRCSNL::WALES | David from Down-under | Mon Aug 05 1991 19:04 | 17 |
| G'Day,
A timely piece of information form yesterday morning's newspaper.
Some medical research team (didn't say whether it was a male of
female team) have concluded that in many cases bras do more damage than
good. Not so much in the breast area but the back. Now I thought
large breasted women wore bras to reduce back pain etc but they claim
that the pressure exerted by the straps on the shoulders and across the
back is worse than the bouncing of large breasts. They claim that over
70% of women who complained of back pain were cured simply by not
wearing their bra! Recommendation: don't wear a bra until the
manufacturers can come up with newer designs that spread the load more
evenly.
David.
|
948.97 | | GNUVAX::QUIRIY | christine | Mon Aug 05 1991 21:16 | 11 |
|
Once again, I'd suggest y'all to look at Sears. Karen, we sound like
we're about the same size. I've always been not quite a B (or an A,
when I'm thinner). Playtex for awhile (may still) had a line of bras
that I liked called Nearly [A,B,C]. After awhile, I decided I didn't
like the fabric. However, the ones I just got at Sears, I like.
They're made of nylon and lycra and are satiny. Very simple. Thin
straps and band. Front closure. Straps adjust in the back. I checked
but they didn't have a "name", just a number.
CQ
|
948.98 | VS: Sizes Petite, Diminutive, and Small only? | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Tue Aug 06 1991 10:08 | 8 |
| Victoria's Secret thinks a size *10* is a "Large"?? (Do they make a
"giantess" size?) Luckily, I almost never wear the damn things - like
my mother, I am not busty enough that it matters much, so both of us
only wear them when protocol requires (same times that I have to wear
stockings - ycch - and impractical teeter-y shoes). Mother is big on
camisoles.
/Charlotte
|
948.99 | I like Victoria's Secret | REGENT::WOODWARD | Executive Sweet | Tue Aug 06 1991 10:17 | 3 |
| I bought a bra at VS recently, in a B cup...I am normally an A-.
I loved it...it gave me cleavage, was silk and lace and and low cut.
Not at all practical, but perfect for the occasion. 8)
|
948.100 | I hate bras! | HARDY::BUNNELL | | Thu Aug 08 1991 10:22 | 16 |
| I have been searching for bras recently and I have to
FLAME!!!!
What makes these manufacturers think that they know the SHAPE of every
womans breast?! Molded or shaped cups just DO NOT FIT and I am ready to
give the companies a call about this!
And another thing...front closure????? Fine if you don't have a
ribcage! They don't fit me because of my ribs which are probably larger
than ... oh never mind!
MAybe I will just stick to my running bra. The only problem there is that
it is not cut low enough, it looks like heavy machinery...
The bandaids are sounding pretty good about now....
The search continues...8*(((((
|
948.101 | | CARTUN::NOONAN | Ding Dong...Avon calling | Thu Aug 08 1991 10:48 | 12 |
| When I do wear a bra, it is always front-closure. And I have the
ribcage from Hell! (Because of my lung problems, my ribcage has been
enlarging over the last 10 years or so. Now, when I lie down....oh,
never mind!)
Anyway, be hopeful, comfortable front-closures *are* out there.
Oh, and bandaids are sort of silly, because you can see the outline of
the bandaid. I did it once, then decided "why bother?"
E Grace
|
948.102 | sorry! couldn't resist! I'll hide my head in shame now... | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Thu Aug 08 1991 11:04 | 8 |
| When I do wear a bra, it is always front-closure. And I have the
ribcage from Hell! (Because of my lung problems, my ribcage has been
enlarging over the last 10 years or so. Now, when I lie down....oh,
never mind!)
Hey, babe, nice set o' lungs!
D!
|
948.103 | a-HEM | CARTUN::NOONAN | Ding Dong...Avon calling | Thu Aug 08 1991 11:09 | 1 |
|
|
948.104 | | WAHOO::LEVESQUE | Going nonlinear | Thu Aug 08 1991 12:01 | 3 |
| >Hey, babe, nice set o' lungs!
<sigh>
|
948.105 | Who wore 'em | RANGER::PEASLEE | | Thu Aug 08 1991 12:08 | 3 |
| RE; .96
Who did they use for the study...men or women???
|
948.106 | 8^} | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | ruby slippers, emerald eyes | Thu Aug 08 1991 12:12 | 11 |
| re.96
oh sh*t ... all this talk of efficient load distribution is making me
wish I'd kept up my P.E. cert in Civil Engineering ... what an
opportunity I've missed
re.105
oh, touche!
Annie
|
948.107 | | USWRSL::SHORTT_LA | Touch Too Much | Thu Aug 08 1991 12:48 | 9 |
| re: .103
�Hey, babe, nice set o' lungs!
Why is it ok in WN when one woman objectifies another woman with a
comment like this? If objectification is wrong when it's done by
a man, is it less wrong when it's done by a woman?
L.J.
|
948.108 | | CARTUN::NOONAN | Ding Dong...Avon calling | Thu Aug 08 1991 12:53 | 4 |
| I suppose, L.J., because sometimes friends tease one another. If I
didn't object, I guess I don't feel objectified, aye?
E Grace
|
948.109 | I believe it's a pun | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | ruby slippers, emerald eyes | Thu Aug 08 1991 12:56 | 6 |
| or, maybe, just maybe, because in this specific instance E Grace
mentioned that her lungs where a cause of rib cage expansion.
or maybe not.
Annie
|
948.110 | | ASIC::BARTOO | Birds of Prey know they're cool | Thu Aug 08 1991 13:09 | 8 |
| > mentioned that her lungs where a cause of rib cage expansion.
Or an effect?
Nick
|
948.111 | | GNUVAX::BOBBITT | an insurmountable opportunity | Thu Aug 08 1991 13:13 | 14 |
|
re: .102
> Hey, babe, nice set o' lungs!
yeah, I've heard that one. "Nice posture" was another attempt at
finesse.
-Jody
p.s. I didn't feel objectified with Diana commented upon her own lungs
and then followed with that quip - I felt it was self-referential in
this case.
|
948.112 | American 'English' 101 >;-) | SA1794::CHARBONND | revenge of the jalapenos | Thu Aug 08 1991 13:14 | 1 |
| RE.109 Umm, Annie, are you aware of the slang meaning of 'lungs'?
|
948.113 | | BUSY::KATZ | Starving Hysterical Naked | Thu Aug 08 1991 13:31 | 10 |
| set/attitude=on (that's "attitude" with a capital "a" and a capital
"tude")
Oh, FILTH, my tender sensibilities!
set/attitude=off
I'm back! What did I miss? ;-)
\D/
|
948.114 | a pun, also a play upon words ... | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | ruby slippers, emerald eyes | Thu Aug 08 1991 13:36 | 13 |
| re.112
indeed, yes.
that's why it was a _pun_, silly ...
see also: bumper bullets, bone strutcha, life vests, yahbos, ta-tas,
melons, ...
sheesh, Dana! I know I didn't grow up over here, but I didn't just come
to big city yesterday.
Annie
|
948.115 | filth? what filth? | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | ruby slippers, emerald eyes | Thu Aug 08 1991 13:53 | 16 |
| re.113
you missed your opportunity to cash in on the BIG bucks by designing a
more efficient load-distribution system for breasts that is also
comfortable and is esthetically pleasing [i.e. is more attractive than
an army issue sling]
[I would say women's breasts, but men have them too so I want to be
egalitarian ... ]
Oh, now _there's_ a THOUGHT! Make all pubescent humans wear training
brassieres whether they need them or not. Teach them that not wearing
them, regardless of need, indicates that they are destined for moral
decrepitude ... like tomorrow, avoid the rush.
Annie
|
948.116 | yes, *sheesh* indeed! | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Thu Aug 08 1991 14:29 | 6 |
| Maybe, LJ, because she is a friend of mine and I was making a teasing
remark that has NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU!
And you seemed to have failed to notice the title...
D!
|
948.117 | | USWRSL::SHORTT_LA | Touch Too Much | Thu Aug 08 1991 15:10 | 8 |
| re: .116
�Maybe, LJ, because she is a friend of mine and I was making a teasing
�remark that has NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU!
Do you realize what you just said?
L.J.
|
948.118 | | ULTRA::WITTENBERG | Secure Systems for Insecure People | Thu Aug 08 1991 15:18 | 5 |
| You should probably read the title essay in "A Stress Analysis of
a Strapless Evening Gown". First published in the late 50s, it's
now available again in paperback.
--David
|
948.119 | | WLDKAT::GALLUP | What's your damage, Heather? | Thu Aug 08 1991 15:43 | 41 |
|
RE: .116
Then why didn't you send mail instead?
Interestingly enough, this is the kind of thing that is USUALLY the
case when comments like this are made. Comments like this are usually
made between friends who are teasing each other.....especially
in a conference like this. However, what people don't realize is that
they are "performing" their teasing act for well over a 1000 people who
1. Don't know these people
2. Don't know they are friends
3. Don't know they are teasing
LJ's right in that the same situation has occurred, in this conference,
between males and females and it has been severely frowned on. I
remember, I did it once and got some angry mail messages about it.
Relax, D!, so what you wrote has been criticized. That's not a big
deal, it happens all the time to all of us. Not only that, most of us
do things everyday without fully understanding the ramifications it
could have to others. So what......acknowledge it and move on. Try
to understand that the way YOU view something is not
1. 100% "THE right" way to view it
2. necessarily the way anyone else is going to view it
If the comment was intended for E Grace and her eyes only and wasn't
open for speculation (or criticism) by anyone else, it would have been
much wiser to send mail.
Just some observations.
kath
|
948.120 | ** comod reponse ** | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | ruby slippers, emerald eyes | Thu Aug 08 1991 15:55 | 9 |
| flirt and fluff is a frequent occurence here in =wn=
no matter the personal tastes of the audience there is nothing
inherently against common practice, let alone policy, in friends
engaging in flirt and fluff.
regards,
Ann Johnston
=wn= comod
|
948.121 | Context, LJ! | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Thu Aug 08 1991 17:10 | 12 |
| I don't feel it's the gender of the person making the comment at all,
but rather their relationship. I have a male friend of mine, wild to
the core, who wouldn't hesitate to say something like that, (not that
particular comment but you know what I mean), to me and get away with
it, no problem.
But only someone that close, male or female, has the right to that level
of familiarity. Without that "s/he's a friend" background, the comment
can easily take on different meanings. It's trust, it's friendship and
it's all context. Not gender.
Sandy
|
948.122 | he just knows you wouldn't stand up 4 yourself | COGITO::SULLIVAN | Singing for our lives! | Thu Aug 08 1991 17:15 | 4 |
|
But, Sandy, we all know how timid you are. :-)
Justine -- a friend of Sandy's
|
948.123 | Hey, Kath, RELAX!! | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Thu Aug 08 1991 17:42 | 28 |
| > Relax, D!
Ahem. Excuse me, Kath, but it annoys me no end when people tell me to
relax. You might be interested to know (though I doubt it) that I was
not upset, nor tense, so your telling me to relax was pretty meaningless.
> So what......acknowledge it and move on.
Kathy...why are you telling me what to do??? I *have* moved on, until
you put this note in to bring me back to it. I found LJ's butting her
head in to a little friendly exchange between E and myself offensive, and
I chose to say so.
> If the comment was intended for E Grace and her eyes only
It was intended for her, and for the amusement of those who know her
and those who know me. Since that involves a goodly percentage of noters
here, why should I put it in mail? And, as Ann said, there is no rule,
either written or implied, against friendly back-and-forth in the file.
For me, it is what makes this file a wonderful place - the friends,
the friendly chit-chat, etc. I will *not* move it to email just because
you think it would be "wise".
Just some observations.
Wrong. You were not obversving, you were *advising*. *Big* difference.
D!, who makes it a point not to attempt to alter the behaviors of others
|
948.124 | are you happy to see me or are you just being coy? | TLE::DBANG::carroll | A woman full of fire | Thu Aug 08 1991 17:44 | 15 |
| �Maybe, LJ, because she is a friend of mine and I was making a teasing
�remark that has NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU!
Do you realize what you just said?
Yes, I said
�Maybe, LJ, because she is a friend of mine and I was making a teasing
�remark that has NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU!
I can read what I write, thank you.
Perhaps I don't realize what you *heard*...care to enlighten us?
D!
|
948.125 | ****RATHOLE ALERT**** | YUPPY::DAVIESA | Spirit in the Night | Fri Aug 09 1991 08:11 | 1 |
|
|
948.126 | | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Fri Aug 09 1991 10:10 | 3 |
| Gee Justine, exposed again! ;^> ;^> ;^>
S.
|
948.127 | Solution I found for an uncomfy problem! | ASABET::J_HANSEN | | Fri Aug 09 1991 17:39 | 15 |
| From a normally "read-only":
Warners makes two models that work well for the "in-betweener".
Model 1035 is standard backlatch, no seams, no padding, ALL stretch
and very, very comfortable.
Model 1021 is same stretchy material with a tad of added lace but
is underwired and frontlatch. Also very, very comfortable.
If your favorite store doesn't carry them ask for them to be ordered.
As always, they are not cheap but are worth every penny in comfort!
Julaine
|
948.128 | tradeoffs | RYKO::NANCYB | Woman of Caliber | Sun Sep 22 1991 04:17 | 16 |
|
I recently discovered I have been wearing the wrong
size bra (cup size and band size) for a long time.
This probably caused by my dislike for underwires. I'd
much rather get a larger band size and a smaller cup
size than the right band size and be stuck with an
underwire. After much shopping, I *finally* found the
right band and cup size without an underwire, but it
wasn't easy!
The things you learn when you spend 2 weekends with another
woman !!! ;-)
nancy b.
|
948.129 | | VIDSYS::PARENT | Kit of parts, no glue | Sun Sep 22 1991 14:14 | 12 |
| Nancy,
Seems due to lack of standards and even consistancy your experience
is common. I would think that the manufacturers would attempt to
describe their sizing and styling in some comprehensive way. As it
stands trial and error is about the only reliable way to be sure of
a fit. Even then the vendor rarely make the same bra fit the same way
twice on the same rack, or at least from lot to lot.
An then again, like any other clothes item sometime another eye helps.
Allison
|
948.130 | | SBPEXE::ALFORD | An elephant is a mouse with an operating system | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:12 | 25 |
|
Sorry if this info has already been provided...
For British bra sizes do the following:
Measure yourself around the bust at nipple level, this gives your bra size.
Measure yourself just under the bust.
Subtract the two figures
A difference in inches gives the cup size of
2" = AA
3" = A
4" = B
5" = C
6" = D
7" = E
So, an upper measurement of 36 and a lower measurement of 32 will give a bra
size of 36B.
I've no idea how American or European sizes are calculated, maybe someone can
provide the methods ?
|
948.131 | But I might be wrong. | RDGENG::LIBRARY | A wild and an untamed thing | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:14 | 4 |
| I thought you were supposed to take 2 away from the higher number to
get your "inches", eg, the 36B you mentioned would be 34B.
Alice T.
|
948.132 | | SBPEXE::ALFORD | An elephant is a mouse with an operating system | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:27 | 5 |
|
> I thought you were supposed to take 2 away from the higher number to
> get your "inches", eg, the 36B you mentioned would be 34B.
Not according to the article I got it from....
|
948.133 | What is three'n'six | JUMBLY::BATTERBEEJ | Kinda lingers..... | Thu Oct 03 1991 10:34 | 9 |
| There was a thing on breakfast TV the other day about womens bust
size, which in the UK is getting bigger.
They said that something like 75% of all women are wearing the wrong
bra size. The last two replies seem to indicate why. Not that I've
needed to, but I've never understood bra sizes. Almost as confusing
as pre-decimal money.
Jerome.
|
948.134 | | WMOIS::REINKE_B | all I need is the air.... | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:13 | 6 |
| in re .130
This is essentially the same as a chart I saw in the lingerie
department here in Massachusetts a week ago.
Bonnie
|
948.135 | | SNOBRD::CONLIFFE | out-of-the-closet Thespian | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:14 | 6 |
| "What is three'n'six"???"
Well, the obvious answer is 9, but talking British currency (decimal, not the
real stuff!), 3/6d is 17�p.
Nigel
|
948.136 | 240 old pence in the pound = cash nightmare ! | JUMBLY::BATTERBEEJ | Kinda lingers..... | Thu Oct 03 1991 11:32 | 4 |
| Then why not say 17.5p ?
Jerome who's glad not to remember old money.
|
948.137 | no "right" way for all mfgr | HIGHD::ROGERS | | Thu Oct 03 1991 12:43 | 8 |
| re .131
At least one source (No Nonsense Brands?) i seem to recall the
instructions calling for measuring _above_ the bust (no bra) for the
band size, then across the supported bust for the value from which to
calculate the cup size (bust - band).
Never did understand why all mfgr's don't just measure the band size at
the under_bust, where the band is actually worn ...
|