T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
913.1 | | ELWOOD::CHRISTIE | | Fri Jul 12 1991 09:59 | 10 |
| Yes, both my sister and I have had abnormal PAP smears. Both of us
ended up having cryosurgery with no further problems. Since we
suspect we are DEA daughters, neither one of us were surprised.
I never heard of abnormal PAP smears being attributed to pregnancy,
though. If you are worried, I would suggest getting a second
opinion.
Linda
|
913.2 | call the doc back and *ask* | TLE::DBANG::carroll | Hakuna Matata | Fri Jul 12 1991 10:25 | 15 |
| are you sure it was the pap smear that came out abnormal?
I once had a pap smear, and at the same time they did some other tests,
and they found out I have a nasty infection (I went there because of
vaginal bleeding.) The infection was staf (which is a variation of strep,
I guess) and I had to take antibiotics for a couple of weeks.
Antibiotics don't do a whit of good against cancer, so if the doc prescribed
antibiotics, she must not think that cancer is an issue.
But, to allay you fears, call her back and tell her you are worried about
cancer - she will probably say that there is no danger - and if she *doesn't*
say that, well it is better to know for sure than to worry.
D!
|
913.3 | Respiratory Therapist hat on | CARTUN::NOONAN | Slow down. Live to enjoy ME. | Fri Jul 12 1991 10:33 | 12 |
| Ooooohhhh.......*I* get to pick a nit! Wheeeeeee.....I beat -d!
ahem.
"Staph" is Staphylococcus, a bacteria that occurs in grape-like
groupings.
"Strep" is Streptococcus, a bacteria that occurs in pairs or chains.
E Grace
|
913.4 | pointers | LEZAH::BOBBITT | the yayness principle | Fri Jul 12 1991 10:37 | 13 |
|
see also:
womannotes-V1
595 - excerpts from article on the Pap Smear
womannotes-V2
654 - class II (or worse) pap test results
-Jody
|
913.5 | | LUDWIG::CRAWFORD | | Fri Jul 12 1991 12:49 | 7 |
| re: 4
Jody,
Could you tell me how to access these v1 and v2 references?
thankx kc
|
913.6 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | the yayness principle | Fri Jul 12 1991 14:15 | 12 |
|
They are at
IKE22::womannotes-V1
and
IKE22::womannotes-V2
they're old versions of this file which are now read-only since they
are archived.
-Jody
|
913.7 | One more case | ACESMK::GOLIKERI | | Fri Jul 12 1991 14:17 | 5 |
| My cousin had a pap smear done about 3 months after her 2nd child was
born - it turned out to be abnormal. But after treatment (not sure
about the specifics) another pap smear was normal. Her Dr said that it
was not uncommon to get an abnormal pap smear result soon after
childbirth.
|
913.8 | me, too... | MPO::ROBINSON | but he doesn't have a HEAD! | Fri Jul 12 1991 14:36 | 18 |
|
My three months are just about over - all they would tell
ma was that there are abnormal cells and perhaps it was because
it was done the week after my period....My mother went thru
3 yrs of `abnormal cells' before having a hysterctomy (also
afternumerous cryosurgery, and other procedures[laser?]), and
her mother has had a masectomy. I don't know how I didn't go
crazy during the 3 months, but they'll be over monday, then
we'll see...I've also been having pains in the ovary area, which
were explained away as `possibly gas', `strange flu', and a
couple of other off the wall ansers (then why can't I stand
up straight??).
Anyways, you're not alone, three months will (hopefully) be
gone before you know it...
Sherry
|
913.9 | | RIPPLE::KENNEDY_KA | | Fri Jul 12 1991 15:44 | 4 |
| I had a class 3 pap after my son was born. They did cryosurgery and I
haven't had a reoccurence in 15 years!
Karen
|
913.10 | | VMPIRE::WASKOM | | Fri Jul 12 1991 15:48 | 18 |
| I've also recently gotten an "abnormal Pap smear" response back. The
smear was taken at the same time I went in for a really miserable and
long standing yeast infection, and I've been told to wait for the
infection to clear up to retake the Pap smear, as the infection can
cause the abnormal result.
In your case, I'd try calling the doctor's office back when the kids
are out of the way. (If necessary, get someone in to babysit while you
make the call!) Write down all of your questions, fears, and concerns
before you make the call. If necessary, write them as decision trees,
where you have a different set of questions based on the answers to
previous ones. I've found that nurses can typically handle most of the
question set pretty well, leaving me with only a couple for the doctor,
but your doctor may run his/her practice differently.
Good luck.
Alison
|
913.11 | Here's my experience | KAHALA::CAMPBELL_K | She's laughing inside | Mon Jul 15 1991 13:16 | 36 |
| I had an abnormal pap smear in Feb 1990. A re-test came back Class
III, and I had a colposcopy done in the doctor's office. This
procedure removed a piece of tissue from the cervix to biopsy. Six
weeks later, the results came in that I had abnormal cells on the
cervix, which would have to be removed. (The doctor stressed over
and over that this was NOT cancer, but, left untreated could eventually
become cancerous in 4 to 8 years. I had a choice-- Cryosurgery, which
I cannot recall the details of, because I chose the second which was
Laser surgery. I was told laser is more effective, and less damaging
to the cervix. In September I had the procedure done and left the
hospital on the same day. since then, I have had pap smears done every
three months, and so far, they have all been fine.
I know how you feel; I was terrified of having cancer, especially since
it runs in my family. But it's been over a year since the first bad
pap smear, and everythings fine.
I thought that a pap smear can read abnormal if there is any kind of
irritation or bleeding going on during the test. I would think that
at your 6 week checkup after having a child, there would be a good
possibility that there was bleeding still present, however slight, and
that would be enough to affect the results. Chances are on a re-test
you will be fine.
But like someone previously suggested--call your doctor at a less
stressful time, and ask questions. My doctor was more than happy
to answer all of mine. Also a second opinion may be a good idea.
I know what it's like to have two children so close together; that in
itself is stressful! You don't need to add concern about your health
to that...Good luck, and feel free to write me if you have any
questions, and let us know how it goes!!!
Hugs,
Kim
|
913.12 | Probably nothing to worry about | CADSYS::HECTOR::RICHARDSON | | Mon Jul 15 1991 14:00 | 10 |
| Me, too. I've had both cryosurgery and laser surgery done, but
everything has been normal for the last several years (just had a pap
test done last Friday, so we'll see if that one is also normal). The
surgery was no big deal - done to "clean up" abnormal cells which could
have eventually become cancerous. If you have a choice, the laser
surgery is less trouble; I had some bleeding after the cryosurgery.
Either way it only takes a few minutes, you can hardly feel it, and it
can be done right in the doctor's office.
/Charlotte
|
913.13 | | XCUSME::QUAYLE | i.e. Ann | Mon Jul 15 1991 22:15 | 19 |
| Just before my first child was born, I had a class II cell change
result. Scared me! At 6 weeks post and again at 3 months post all was
well. Later I was using IUD birth control (plastic Lippe's loop,
then copper 7) and had class II results every 6 weeks for more than a
year. We just kept testing and watching for changes. I don't use
birth control at all now, and haven't had any abnormalities show up for
years.
I did, however, have thryoid cancer ten years back. Now I have
neither cancer nor thyroid (well, a little scrap of thyroid,
thoroughly suppressed - I trust and test regularly ;) - by synthroid,
.2/day). For me, the result of cancer was three weeks off with pay,
but I remember how frightened I was at the diagnosis and while waiting
for surgery.
Hang in there, and please keep us posted!
aq
|
913.14 | Smear contained 'wrong' cell type? | GERBIL::PHINNEY | | Tue Jul 16 1991 13:43 | 20 |
| Has anyone been in the situation where you need to get a second pap
smear because the original smear extracted the 'wrong type of cells'
(in real layman's language)?
I'm 36, have had normal pap smears since the beginning, have never had
a doctor tell me this and even at the time of the original, she
mentioned the possibility of this happening.
This is a new doctor for me, since switching to an HMO, and not only
my first woman doctor, but the first time I've heard such a situation.
I was kind of alarmed when she called and thought at first that she
might be trying to 'hide' the fact that I had an abnormal smear, not
an 'ineffective' one. But then I thought that that would be unethical
- she would have to tell me the truth. In any case, I'm due to go back
in August. I just was curious as to whether anyone else had had this
experience/explanation.
Thanks
Martha
|
913.15 | retest can be okay | LJOHUB::GONZALEZ | Books, books, and more books! | Tue Jul 16 1991 15:58 | 15 |
| I've twice had to get a second pap smear. Once because it was too
close to my period and the smear was contaminated with menses.
The second time because the cells had apparently not been fixed right
or not gotten to the lab in time and so were too decomposed to test.
I would think that the scrape may not be not enough or go deeply enough
into the cervix, or be from the outside of the cervix rather than
Getting a pap test is not a jolly time, I know. But a retest should
not be anything to worry about. If you distrust the doctor you may
want to talk with him/her and find out if you really distrust him/her.
Margaret
|
913.16 | same experience... | RYKO::NANCYB | window shopping | Wed Jul 17 1991 21:31 | 23 |
| re: .14 (GERBIL::PHINNEY)
> Has anyone been in the situation where you need to get a second pap
> smear because the original smear extracted the 'wrong type of cells'
> (in real layman's language)?
> This is a new doctor for me, since switching to an HMO, and not only
> my first woman doctor, but the first time I've heard such a situation.
I was in a similar situation (new doctor, new HMO) and
had the same result. Actually, it was phrased 'not enough
of the right kind of cells' when the doctor's office called
me. This was in January.
Since this is my **least** favorite medical procedure, I
was not pleased. I had a lot to do at work and had no
trouble rationalizing canceling the first reschedule ;-].
I eventually had a 2'nd pap, and it was fine.
Maybe we have the same doctor? (we'd better send mail for that)
nancy b.
|
913.17 | heredity | ASIC::JONES | | Thu Sep 12 1991 14:24 | 8 |
| Just a note, perhaps to ease your mind a bit. You mention your family
history. Cancer is heredity, but only by type. Meaning if your Mom
had breast cancer you may be at a higher risk for breast cancer, but
this does not affect your risk for cervical cancer. This is always
confusing because the term "cancer" is used for all the diseases, but
they are not the same disease each one is unique.
|
913.18 | god, I hate typing parts of my family history. ick | MR4DEC::EGNOONAN | Lady of the Rainbow | Thu Sep 12 1991 21:51 | 17 |
| Actually, it is not heritary, though familial links have been found
with some cancers. "Familial" is not the same as "hereditary".
Also, as for it only being within types: that is what they believe now.
We have no way of knowing if next year they will decide they were
wrong. Both of my parents have had cancer, my father's brother died of
cancer (as did my dad), both grandfathers, my sister, my first cousin.
None of them had the same type of cancer, but there is a definate
family history, no?
However, as others have said, an abnormal Pap is not that uncommon.
That is the reason they do a follow-up. There are many things that can
cause the abmormality, right down to something odd in the laboratory.
E Grace
|