T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
825.1 | OK, I'll bite... | TALLIS::TORNELL | | Wed May 22 1991 14:03 | 10 |
| To improve "the" score? The game itself doesn't have a score, only
players or teams of players do. Perhaps your dream signified you were
on the outside looking in, but wanted to get in believing you had some
"universal" or "global" contribution to make that none of the players
themselves had since as "mere players", they could contribute only to
their own scores.
Playing Freud,
Sandy
|
825.2 | shades of Jimmy Carter | GIAMEM::ROSE | | Thu May 23 1991 08:19 | 20 |
| re: .0
Yes, and ready or not...here's my version of your s-e-x-y
dream, reparaphrased:
I am a man. I'm aroused. I've already died, and I'm almost -
but not quite - in heaven. Look at those women over there!
They've already made out like crazy, and they're still goin'
at it, hot and heavy. SCORE! My god, look at the size of
those pieces! SCORE! My god, there's another one being laid!
Can I get in on this? Can I get a piece of the action? Let's
face it, given my piece, I could add quite a few points, that's
for sure. But wait - I'm just a newcomer. I haven't played yet.
I don't have a word, only a syllable, only a "ment." I'll have
to join up with "la" - and then they'll be a "lament." They'll
be mad. I'll be sorry! But that's not what I meant!
Virginia
|
825.3 | dreams can be fascinating | GUESS::DERAMO | Be excellent to each other. | Thu May 23 1991 09:45 | 7 |
| Your dream had a typo in it? :-)
Do you remember why you were afraid they would get mad at
you? (for interfering?, because it was supposed to be
your funeral?, etc.)
Dan
|
825.4 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Thu May 23 1991 11:13 | 25 |
| Re: .2 Neat! (Or were you expecting me to be offended?) I had
only been considering the surface-level metaphors. But you must be
right. I've taken a battering in many notefiles, but never had a dream
about it. Must be sexual.
There was no real notion of "score" going on in the dream. I used that
word afterward to decribe my desire to help or join in (i.e., to
improve the score, since it was like Scrabble). But since I said it,
I guess I can't disown it.
There was no feeling that I had all the answers or even one answer. The
feeling was that I thought I could contribute. The women were all acting
as a team cooperatively (hey, this is a dream, it doesn't have to be
realistic), doing something interesting, and I wanted to join in.
And besides, in the dream, my piece was just as big as anyone elses and
was one I knew the women would all be excited about if they'd only let
me participate. :^)
Re: -.1 The funeral notion was VERY vague in the dream. If you want
to get Freudian, I suppose to be rejected by women (mother) is death
for a man (boy).
- Vick
|
825.5 | ment ion notion | GIAMEM::ROSE | | Mon May 27 1991 17:35 | 51 |
| re: .4
Thank you! No, I wasn't expecting you to be offended - I wouldn't
have entered the reply if I had thought that.
You say that the funeral notion - "I think this is my funeral." -
was VERY vague in the dream. The fact that the notion was there
at all may indicate that it's important. It may mean, "I think -
this is my funeral;" and, translated further, "When I say what I
think, I'm perceived as annoying - that's my problem."
You also say that the women were all acting as a team cooperatively.
I didn't get that picture. Initially you said that their game was
like scrabble, exccept for the size and the format of the tiles. To
me, scrabble has cooperative elements, but it's definitely an individ-
ual and competitive venture. It's interesting that the tiles are about
"throw pillow size." The word "pillow" connotes "support." "Support-
ive" is a good description of womens' attitudes toward one another.
"Pillow" also echoes the word "fellow" and may be suggestive of "be-
littlement" - of the idea that women have the power to put you in your
place [judgmentally] and to sentence you. The sequenced "pillows" may
represent successive occasions in which your contributions were
de-valued.
Your feelings don't come through too clearly. You say, "The feeling
was that I thought I could contribute." But that sentence is about a
thought, not about a feeling. Your feeling that women may get mad at
you may be, in part, a projection of your own feelings of anger at them.
You say you've been battered before. You say you want to improve the
score. You picture women getting excited when they see - and, in this
case, hear - your piece. "Piece" may also refer to "peace" - composure
in the face of excitement. Do you think you might want to get back at
them, to sort of even up the score, or to perhaps go them one better?
If the women get mad at you, what will you feel?
To summarize: You want to play, but you have the wrong equipment.
This game requires words; but you have a suffix, which isn't a word.
As a player, you won't be acceptable. Your "word" is "ment" - which
may mean that on numerous interactive occasions you were a man with a
"t" or a "cross" or a burdensome problem. Perhaps your contributions
were met with such niceties as "OH, SHUT-UP! You don't have a word
to say about it!" But now "ment" means "meant," and "meant" is most
definitely a word. If the players will accept this word, the game
will take on a whole new dimension. It will incorporate *sound* as
well as sight. And to the extent that you identify with your word,
then you're also "sound." In other words, there's nothing wrong with
you. You're O.K.
Virginia
.
|
825.6 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Tue May 28 1991 11:03 | 7 |
| Virginia,
I think you are greatly overinterpreting my dream. In dreamwork, the
dreamer owns the dream. Many of the things you say, though interesting
(and clever), don't fit well with my experience of the dream. But
your thoughts on the subject have been fascinating. Thanks. - Vick
|
825.7 | | GIAMEM::ROSE | | Wed May 29 1991 05:42 | 28 |
| re: .6
Vick,
Yes, I'm intentionally overinterpreting the dream. And, yes, the
dreamer definitely owns the dream - it's the product of the brain
that creates it. It's relatively easy to interpret a dream face-
to-face, because numerous questions can be asked and answered im-
mediately. A simple "yes" or "no" answer can eliminate an entire
train of thought and help to zero in on what's significant.
But over the network it's another story. I usually have no way to
judge what's significant to the dreamer and what isn't, so I try to
include whatever possibilities can be fit into a coherent picture.
Hopefully, the dreamer can get something out of it and can then go
on from there.
Sometimes, even with someone I know well, attempts at interpretation
get nowhere. Questions are answered, but lead to dead ends. Imagi-
nation is stymied. And yet there the dream imagery sits - perfectly
clear - like a tantalizing but senseless puzzle. However, the puz-
zle is usually solved in a couple of days when the dream literally
*happens*. I don't think that the Dream Women dream fits into this
precognitive category, but it is an additional possibility that could
be considered.
Virginia
|
825.8 | i thot, therefore i were? | BENONI::JIMC | illegitimi non insectus | Wed Jun 05 1991 14:02 | 9 |
| a few thots
could your read the other tiles? what did they say? What did the
collection of tiles already played say? were there any words used
which could have a 'ment' added to change the meaning (state ment,
govern ment, excite ment, ment or, etc.)?
jimc
|
825.9 | | R2ME2::BENNISON | Victor L. Bennison DTN 381-2156 ZK2-3/R56 | Wed Jun 05 1991 14:47 | 3 |
| Alas, if I could during the dream, I can't now. All but my own was
lost to memory.
- Vick
|