T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
716.1 | I'm a muller | BROKE::RUSTIE::NALE | Expert Only: I'll do it anyway | Mon Mar 04 1991 12:11 | 16 |
|
I think I also have a tendency to mull rather than think. I
hadn't really noticed this until I'd been reading =wn= for quite
some time and realized, "Wow. These people have really *thought*
about <some issue>. They've come up with *opinions*, *reasons* and
*conclusions*!" It dawned on me that I had a fair amount of
opinions, but I didn't really know where they had come from. I
hadn't thought through the issues, making decisions about how I
felt about them, and coming up reasons for my opinions.
I've tried to rectify the situation somewhat. For me, talking
through the issues with someone else helps me to clarify my
feelings. Sitting quietly is difficult to do. I too reach for
the closest book!
Sue
|
716.2 | one of my greatest pleasures | RUTLND::JOHNSTON | therrrrrre's a bathroom on the right | Mon Mar 04 1991 12:40 | 38 |
| re.0
I seem to have two intermediate states between what you call mulling
and thinking.
I sometimes find that a fairly repetitive manual task that I've
mastered [such as bargello needlepoint or outline quilting] allows me
to focus on a particular subject and follow all of the branchings and
inter-relationships in a relaxed and pressure-less state. The
stitching is an outward sort-of-mantra. [And even years later I can
look at a quilt or a tapestry and have little recollection of having done
the work, but felt the memories cascade as I look at different areas of
the finished work.]
Then, when I am feeling be-set or twitchy, I've found it beneficial to
'park in a quiet place' and de-focus, letting the thoughts and ideas
come as they will.
But, yes, I do a lot of what you call thinking as well. When I have
the house to myself, I can lose hours and sometimes whole days to the
process. I can sit in the front room or at the kitchen table and
become so engrossed that I'm only marginally aware of the quality of
light changing around me.
I don't experience the lure of tasks that you describe once I sit down
and compose myself -- it only takes seconds. But I do experience
difficulty allowing myself the pleasure -- no rest for the wicked and
all that.
Sometimes, I write when I think. When I was doing solo survival
training I used to pack fountain pens [ink so that I could not erase my
thoughts] and empty books for the days I'd be alone. I'd see to my
basic needs and then think and watch light in the trees or shadow on
the water -- sometimes writing, sometimes not.
I think _a_lot_.
Annie
|
716.3 | | IE0010::MALING | Mirthquake! | Mon Mar 04 1991 14:11 | 12 |
| Actually I think I think to much!
When I read I will be struck by something I read and then just sit
thinking about the thought for ten or fifteen minutes. It sometimes
takes me hours to read a short magazine article, because I take so
many thought breaks.
Like Annie, I can spend hours or even days deep in thought, only
marginally aware of whats going on around me and forgetting to eat
because it just doesn't occur to me.
Mary
|
716.4 | cogito ergo cogito | SPCTRM::RUSSELL | | Mon Mar 04 1991 15:00 | 22 |
| I like to take think breaks. Sometimes they are the result of the
need to problem solve, sometimes to think over something I have
just read or experienced. Usually if it is something that has happened
to me I don't think about it for a while because I want to space
between (things happen and then something else happens and then
something follows that so stopping to think can end the experience).
I have problems in what you call mulling. When I am involved in
doing something I tend to "squirrel cage." That's my term for
recursive or dead-end thinking when you go round and round like
a trapped critter. Squirrel caging tends to happen when I'm trying
to work stuff out and am also doing a real world task. I wind up
thinking without solution and acting without quality when I squirrel
cage. Squirrel caging also happens when I am feeling insomniac
and too tired to think rationally.
Real thinking is hard work. It requires attention and a good bull
hockey detector to avoid pitfalls. It also requires, for me, a
dialog with myself to search out patterns, find flaws, find examples.
I think in both words and flashes, sometimes visually.
Margaret
|
716.5 | sum ergo cogito | GEMVAX::ADAMS | | Thu Mar 07 1991 15:35 | 31 |
|
I call all of what's been described "thinking," and visualize
different points on a continuum.
On one end: I concentrate, consciously focusing on something or
other. I don't always need a quiet place though; sometimes the
effort it takes to block out distractions helps me to focus (or
is it the act of focusing that blocks out the distractions).
Anyway, I find it's hard work, but enormously satisfying, usually
productive and, as others have indicated, totally absorbing.
On the other end: what I call mulling is a process that occurs
subconsciously (so I can't really describe it--what a cop out).
Admittedly I am sometimes left wondering how I arrived at a
certain conclusion, but it always seems to work (and, excepting
very personal, gut-instinct issues, a conscious working backward
usually produces a process).
Somewhere in between: what Meigs calls mulling I call my normal,
"default" state. Thoughts and ideas are always bopping around in
there; I need to make a conscious effort to either empty my mind
or focus it.
I operate in the "default" state most of the time--I freely admit
to being lazy (although I suppose I could just be letting my
subconscious do most of the work). I believe good results/
solutions/extraordinary thoughts are a consequence of both
conscious and subconscious thought, but I've come to that
conclusion using mostly my subconscious, so I can't say why 8*).
nla
|