T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
581.1 | | LEZAH::BOBBITT | trial by stone | Thu Dec 13 1990 10:30 | 7 |
| I don't manage very well without toilet paper, personally. Are there
women who do?
boy, I must be REALLY culturally ignorant....
-Jody
|
581.2 | | HLFS00::RHM_MALLO | the wizard from oss | Thu Dec 13 1990 10:36 | 4 |
| In some countries water is used in stead of toilet paper because water
cleans better.
Charles
|
581.3 | just wondering... | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Thu Dec 13 1990 10:41 | 4 |
| re .2, but then how do they dry off?
Lorna
|
581.4 | | GOLF::KINGR | My mind is a terrible thing to use... | Thu Dec 13 1990 10:50 | 5 |
| Lorna... Air dry... HAHAHA!!!!
REK
:-}
|
581.5 | or so it seems to me... :-) | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Thu Dec 13 1990 11:11 | 5 |
| re .4, yeah, but people usually have occasion to put their pants back
on, not having sufficient time to air dry! :-)
Lorna
|
581.6 | This is what I did in India | CADSE::KHER | | Thu Dec 13 1990 14:18 | 21 |
| At the risk of noone ever talking to me again, I'll try to answer.
Formfeed for those who don't like hear about such details
After peeing, you flush and walk out. No washing, no wiping. I have a
lot of pubic hair, but it never caused any problems, infections etc.
After, um how do I say this, um a bowel movement, you wash with water.
You don't wipe dry after washing which meant your panties could get a
little wet. But again I don't remember it being a problem.
So that is how you live without a toilet paper. Incidentally, if you're
used to washing, wiping just doesn't feel as clean. Took me a while
to get used to.
About birth control - I don't know. The govt. is certainly trying to
push comdoms and IUDs. There are advertisements everywhere. But judging
by the rate at which our population is growing, I don't think that
contraceptives are very popular.
|
581.7 | ??? | HPSRAD::LAM | | Thu Dec 13 1990 14:18 | 4 |
| re the base note, are you saying there is no toilet paper in Taiwan?
We definitely use toilet paper in the Far East if that is what you are
wondering.
|
581.8 | | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Thu Dec 13 1990 14:35 | 12 |
| re .6, considering Americans used pages from catalogs and even corn
cobs before they had toilet paper, I guess it's understandable that
some of us might find that hard to get used to. Usually if I'm in a
restroom and one of the stalls has run out of paper, I notice that
nobody goes in there. They wait for the other stalls. As a culture,
we seem to be into wiping. :-)
Lorna
Thanks for the info, though. It's interesting to hear how differently
everyday things can be done in various cultures I think.
|
581.9 | How to wash?? | OK4ME::PILOTTE | | Thu Dec 13 1990 15:28 | 11 |
| re: .7
I was in Taiwan for 2 weeks. During that time I used both western
style and 'Far East' style (in the floor). At no time was toilet paper
available to me in the floor-style models. I used kleenex.
re: washing
How do you use the floor-model toilets to do any washing? I was able
to squat down but not close enough to wash......
Still perplexed....Judy
|
581.10 | Bring your own water | CONFG5::WALKER | | Thu Dec 13 1990 16:48 | 3 |
| Some people take water in with them and pour.
Briana
|
581.11 | bring your own or leave a tip | HPSRAD::LAM | | Thu Dec 13 1990 17:30 | 8 |
| Toilet paper is widely available in supermarkets, and home. Most of the
public restrooms do not offer toilet tissues. I always brought along my
own supply (kleenex), or you get them from an older lady that cleans
the bathroom. In return for the toilet paper, and hand towel, you would
leave her a tip.
I don't want noters here to think that Far East is so backwards that we
use hands :-)
|
581.13 | Prototype shown on telly | AYOV27::GHERMAN | I need a little time | Fri Dec 14 1990 08:37 | 9 |
| Not only that, but it also takes your temperature and analyzes your
waste to determine your health!
Costs �3,000 or so as I remember from Saturday Night Clive.
Amazing :^)
Cheers,
George
|
581.14 | uncle! uncle! | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | freedom: not a gift, but a choice | Fri Dec 14 1990 08:50 | 6 |
|
CORN COBS ?!?!?!?!!
AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
|
581.15 | ? | MR4DEC::MAHONEY | | Fri Dec 14 1990 08:50 | 13 |
| That type of toilet came up couple of years ago, by the TOTO company of
Japan.
I have seen bathrooms in the Far East where there is a water
container (something like a coffee pot with a long spout) discreetly
placed in a corner of the room... in both, public places and private
homes. Also, prior to the invention of the toilet paper there were
newspaper sheets, neatly cut in squares and hung by a side of the wall
within easy reach...
That method has been used for many years by many different countries.
I have to admit that... I have no knowledge of what method people had
prior to the invention of paper press!
...May be old rags? Who knows! the human mind is very sharp, and has
survived for quite a few thousand years.
|
581.17 | Talk about recycling | MRKTNG::GODIN | Naturally I'm unbiased! | Fri Dec 14 1990 09:12 | 6 |
| Harking back to the outhouses of their childhoods, my parents still
refer to toilet paper as either "corn cobs" or "the Sears and Roebuck
catalog." And yes, out-of-date catalogs were left in the outhouse for
judicious use of their pages.
Karen
|
581.18 | | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | freedom: not a gift, but a choice | Fri Dec 14 1990 09:18 | 2 |
| oh, you must mean fresh corncobs, not old dried ones! Say it's so!
|
581.19 | Not as bad as you'd think | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Fri Dec 14 1990 09:19 | 4 |
| One year I took all the kernels off my Indian corn door decoration.
The resultant cob felt surprisingly soft and silky to my fingers.
Ann B.
|
581.20 | Semi-sophisticated | YUPPY::DAVIESA | She is the Alpha... | Fri Dec 14 1990 09:28 | 16 |
|
Not as sophisticated as the air-blow version, but....
In Greece, in a toilet in a restaurant, I came across a shower head
installed next to the toilet in the ladies.
Curious (as you would expect), I turned it on.
I was amazed to find that all the holes seemed to have been blocked
except for a few which directed the shower jets, broadly, at the
bits which would most need cleaning - if you held it under you,
obviously.....
I still blush to remember that, having discovered this, the wretched
thing then refused to turn *off*.
I eventually dumped it in the washbasin and left the area.....
'gail
|
581.21 | | EVETPU::RUST | The Great Boston Molasses Flood | Fri Dec 14 1990 09:29 | 8 |
| Didn't one of Rabelais' characters try out a number of different
things for, um, wiping purposes? I seem to recall that he did *not*
recommand cats - the fur's nice, but those _claws_! - and that his most
satisfactory choice was "the downy neck of a goose"...
Ah, the classics!
-b
|
581.22 | I stayed up to watch Johnny Clegg & Savuka | BLUMON::WAYLAY::GORDON | The gifted and the damned... | Fri Dec 14 1990 09:37 | 6 |
| In fact, those of you who stayed up late enough to watch Carson on
Wed, got the pleasure of seeing one of the Japanese marvals on the show. Comes
complete with a remote control. (Better than trying to reach behind you for
the controls ;-) )
--D
|
581.23 | | NOATAK::BLAZEK | hold up silently my hands | Fri Dec 14 1990 11:44 | 9 |
|
My neverending fascination with European commodes led me to push a
strange button while using a toilet in a Swiss home. The ensuing
rush of warm water was surprising, to say the least, but pleasant.
Hours later, I emerged.
Carla
|
581.24 | | BOLT::MINOW | Cheap, fast, good; choose two | Fri Dec 14 1990 12:09 | 6 |
| re: .19:
One year I took all the kernels off my Indian corn door decoration.
Gosh, did it hurt much?
Martin.
|
581.25 | | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante divorcee | Fri Dec 14 1990 15:38 | 2 |
| And remember, back in the days of high fiber diets certain bodily functions were
less, umm, messy. liesl
|
581.26 | Considering the subject matter... %^} | SSGBPM::KENAH | I am the catalyst, not the poison | Fri Dec 14 1990 16:07 | 10 |
| >I have heard rumors of a new toilet, in technology-conscious Japan,
>that sprays you gently but with enough force to wash you and then
>directs a flow of warm air at you like a hot-air hand dryer.
>
>Can anyone confirm or debunk these rumpors?
^^^^^^^
|
Interesting typo-----------------------+
andrew
|
581.28 | | OXNARD::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Fri Dec 14 1990 17:12 | 4 |
| It was my impression that in many countries you were expected to provide your
own TP in public restrooms. At least that's what my guidebooks say...
-- Charles
|
581.29 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | bread&roses | Sat Dec 15 1990 16:51 | 22 |
| dried leaves and moss have also been used for similar purposes.
just imagine what women did for menstrual fluids before kotex.
for a long time it was rags which they had to wash each month,
but i do recall that moss and rabbit pelts were mentioned by
jean auel (valley of the...)
face it, toilet paper and bidets are a modern convenience, generations
upon generations got by with much less..
gross remark follows form feed
i recall (in an earlier version of =wn= perhaps), someone mentioning
the problem of cleaning up small oblong knots of dust and fur
that fell in the churches from women's privates during the services.
they were called something like sofit mouses....but I really don't
remember this well, it made me gag to read it.
bj
|
581.30 | Yes, It was odd.. | ORCAS::MCKINNON_JA | Phase 3 won't phase me! | Sun Dec 16 1990 13:11 | 7 |
|
for a tampon/"kotex" type substitute.
3 Pottery sponges tied up with dental floss left dangling.
|
581.31 | | IE0010::MALING | Working in a window wonderland | Sun Dec 16 1990 19:20 | 8 |
| What about women's urinals? Are they cultural too? I noticed they are
much more common in Canada than in the U.S.
There are some of them here in some of the ladies rooms in MRO1, but as
far a I can tell, noone uses them. If that's the only stall available
people wait.
Mary
|
581.33 | birth control in Germany & France=PILL | TENERE::MCDONALD | | Mon Dec 17 1990 13:24 | 16 |
| Birth Control: In Germany & France, from talking with women , men &
doctors, it seems like ALL WOMEN use the pill. People were shocked when
I told them that a lot of women in USA use methods like the diaphragm
due to health concerns about the pill. I was shocked that so many
women in Germany & France do not consider other ways than the pill.
Most German women start very young to take the pill & it is not paid
for at all by the govt. for students (no planned parenthood clinics).
Toilet paper: My cousin who was a missionary in India told me that
they use their left hand, & therefore it was considered very rude
when he passed food at the dinner table with his left hand (unknowingly
at first).
When I went to Russia a student there told me that toilet paper was
unavailable for the general public to buy. It was in our hotel however, I
I carried my own around.
|
581.34 | some people take the soap... | COBWEB::SWALKER | celluloid heroes never feel any pain | Mon Dec 17 1990 14:13 | 20 |
|
> When I went to Russia a student there told me that toilet paper was
> unavailable for the general public to buy. It was in our hotel however, I
> I carried my own around.
I spent about 6 months as an exchange student in Moscow. At that
time, toilet paper appeared only sporadically in stores, so we
were instructed to bring our own. When that ran out, we either
bought some in stores (for the few lucky enough to be in the right
place at the right time), got it through friends who stockpiled it,
or used paper towels or paper napkins (which were much easier to
find). Generally speaking, it was expected that public toilets
(except those in hotels) would not have any toilet paper.
Due to the scarcity of the stuff, when we had excursions to other
cities and stayed in hotels, the toilet paper in our rooms generally
left with us. (Four years in the U.S. later, I find this amusing.)
Sharon
|
581.35 | bizarre | DECWET::JWHITE | peace and love | Mon Dec 17 1990 14:27 | 5 |
|
re:.33
lauren had much the same experience. when she tried to purchase
contracepive gel they looked at her as if she was from mars.
|
581.36 | Different pills? | HOO78C::VISSERS | Dutch Comfort | Tue Dec 18 1990 04:41 | 11 |
| re. 33
Euro-use of the pill, I suppose you can include Holland in that,
although I've heard that the low-hormone "mini" pills are *much* more
common over here - in fact it's an exception to see the "normal" pill
be prescribed. Maybe this difference is due to the "mini" pill not
being as common in the US?
Since this is only hearsay feel free to let me stand corrected!!
Ad
|
581.37 | | HLFS00::RHM_MALLO | the wizard from oss | Tue Dec 18 1990 06:29 | 12 |
| Low dosage oral contraceptives are indeed the most prescribed (at least
in Holland and Germany).
Medium to high dosage ones are prescribed only when the body weight
requires it (drugs dosages are always in mcg/kg bodyweight) and
sometimes if a woman somehow can't get into the routine of taking the
pill at the same time each day.
Somehow in this part of the world oral contraception is considered the
safest and most practical method of birth control.
More and more people opt for a permanent method however after they
consider their family to be complete.
Charles, who used to do pharmaceutical research in a previous life
|
581.38 | Have you tried this? | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Dec 18 1990 08:50 | 7 |
| > More and more people opt for a permanent method however after they
> consider their family to be complete.
This is, however, selective. If you consider your family complete with
no children, then permanence is not easy to achieve.
Heather
|
581.39 | | HLFS00::RHM_MALLO | the wizard from oss | Tue Dec 18 1990 08:55 | 4 |
| Even people who consider their family complete without children opt for
the more permanent method.
Charles
|
581.40 | Single people are not trusted to know what they wzant | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Tue Dec 18 1990 09:01 | 11 |
|
> Even people who consider their family complete without children opt for
> the more permanent method.
Charles, I have been trying to do this for 20 years, I believe that I may
succeed within the next 2 years.
It isn't easy.
Heather
|
581.41 | | HLFS00::RHM_MALLO | the wizard from oss | Tue Dec 18 1990 09:23 | 15 |
| That's a long time indeed!
It's funny to hear the lame arguments the medics produce when you tell
them you don't want any children because you're convinced you won't
be able to be a good father for them and that having children will
cause your marriage to go down the drain.
My medic immediately came with the question "but what if your wife dies
or you get divorced and you meet another woman?"
I managed not to get angry but told him quite clearly that me not being
able to be a good father had nothing to with my wife or any possible
future wife but with *me*.
After that it was simple.
I think they would even except that from single people.
Charles
|
581.42 | Freedom's just another word for...spade | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | Mentor | Tue Dec 18 1990 09:33 | 15 |
| I guess I was just lucky. I simply explained to the doctor that I
hated kids. After that, it was easy! (*8
Seriously, I explained my reasons for not *ever* wanting children, and
that I had known this for ~7 years. Since I was married, the doctor
wanted to see my husband to make sure we were in agreement and that he
(the doctor) wouldn't end up getting sued or something. If I had been
single the doctor would not have needed to speak to anyone else.
Oh, the doctor asked my if I was really *realllly* sure, but all in all
the discussions only lasted 1/2 hour or so. I had never had a child,
and I was 23. Considering that my husband was 36, I guess I am lucky
that I wasn't talked out of it in favor of Richard getting a vasectomy.
E Grace
|
581.43 | Rupert Murdoch publication though | WMOIS::M_KOWALEWICZ | Y'never know where y'goin til y'get there | Tue Dec 18 1990 10:35 | 6 |
|
Last week in the Boston Herald there was an article that linked
vasectomies to a higher incidence of prostate cancer in men. That is all
I remember from the article and I threw the paper away so here's 2 cents worth.
Kbear
|
581.44 | | HOO78C::ANDERSON | Dashing through the snow.... | Wed Dec 19 1990 06:50 | 8 |
| Re .42
>I simply explained to the doctor that I hated kids.
Perhaps you are preparing them wrongly. Have you tried sauteing them
and serving them with root vegetables and a cheese sauce?
Jamie.
|
581.45 | thanx | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Dec 19 1990 08:29 | 12 |
|
Thanks Jamie, that made my day,
I'm sure I could convince them If I used that line :-)
Maybe I should collect a whole bunch of recipes? !
Heather
|
581.46 | | GWYNED::YUKONSEC | MSP | Wed Dec 19 1990 09:05 | 3 |
| (*8 (*8 (*8 (*8 (*8
E Grace
|
581.47 | | OXNARD::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Wed Dec 19 1990 14:39 | 14 |
| Saute a young child? How barbaric. Saute should be saved for older children,
which being generally less tender respond better to saute. Adolescents are fit
only for braising, and even then it's difficult to make a truly elegant
presentation of adolescent. Full adults are only fit for stewing. I myself,
prefer to be stewed in Port, but I find that a good bitter, or even Burgundy
works as almost as well. Young children, being the most tender of the family,
and having a larger portion of body fat are best roasted.I concur that root
vegetables go well with roasted young child, but they too should be roasted. I
feel that a cheese sauce is inappropriate, as the delicate flavor of the
yongster would be overwhelmed, and since there is so much fat, a hollandaise or
bernaise is inappropriate as well. Personally I'd recommend simply larding with
a bit of garlic, and serving in it's own juice.
-- Charles (owner of a fine 20 pounder...)
|
581.48 | Pointer | REGENT::BROOMHEAD | Don't panic -- yet. | Wed Dec 19 1990 14:52 | 5 |
| No, Charles, adults can be roasted and even be well-presented.
There is a regretably excellent description at the beginning of
_Courtship_Rite_ by Donald Kingsbury.
Ann B.
|
581.51 | Just in time for your holiday dinner table | BOLT::MINOW | Cheap, fast, good; choose two | Wed Dec 19 1990 16:49 | 47 |
| Of course, if you ask an expert, you'll get some other information
you probably didn't know you needed.
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 90 19:12:30
From: [email protected]
Subject: leftovers
To: [email protected]
... [respelled to avoid offending the fastidious]
a cannibal who graded his victims for taste appeal says the flesh of other
savages is much better than that of outsiders - especially the germans,
russians and japanese.
TOH HOON, 53, revealed to dutch anthropologist JAN de GRAAF that he had the
opportunity to sample dozens of foreigners in his 40-year career in the
jungles of borneo and made mental notes about all of them.
dr. de GRAFF of Amsterdam said the man's first choice for a meal of human
flesh was other cannibals and headhunters "because they have good, clean
tasting flesh with excellent texture."
The worst flesh the cannibal ever had was that of a japanese scientist,
who tasted like "raw fish sprinkled with sand," the expert said.
"i'm not at all surprised that he preferred his own kind because all
primitive people believe themselves superior to everyone else," dr. de
GRAFF added. "What does surprise me is that he rated the flesh of his
victims according to their nationality.
"He could actually taste the differences that were borne of their
widely different dietary backgrounds."
According to dr. de GRAFF, TOH said he hasn't had a meal of human flesh in
several years because old age now inhibits his hunting.
But he seemed to have a vivid recollection of several dozen humans he
ate in previous years and had this to say about his dinner guests:
ENGLISHMEN: " tough and stringy, but otherwise tasty."
GERMANS: " entirely too fat and greasy."
FRENCHMEN: " greasy, but very tender."
JAPANESE: " terrible, and only CHINESE are worse."
HISPANICS: " full of gristle, but great as a soup."
CANADIANS: " bland, almost watery, better with spices."
RUSSIANS: " bitter and foul-smelling."
ITALIANS: " spicy."
POLES: " too spicy."
IRISHMEN: " sickly sweet."
"The one AMERICAN TOH ate wa rated high for taste, texture and appearence,"
said dr. de GRAFF.
"The meat wasn't quite as good as that of savages, but TOH said it was
definitely second best."
frater luXnoIr
|
581.52 | a modest proposal | TLE::D_CARROLL | Hakuna Matata | Wed Dec 19 1990 17:21 | 11 |
| I disagree...I think sauting would be perfect. But I agree that a
hollandaise sauce would be to much...rather, I think delicate spicing
and just a little butter (olive oil, maybe?) would be perfect.
Then, of course, for the adventurous ones, don't cook it at all.
Googoo maki (baby sushi) is fabulous, but the baby *must* be very
fresh. Don't use too much soy sauce or wasabi, though, because as
pointed out before, the flavor is too delicate to be hidden by strong
flavorings.
D!
|
581.53 | | WMOIS::B_REINKE | bread&roses | Wed Dec 19 1990 17:30 | 5 |
| can we please get back to the base note topic..
this rathole is a bit hard on my stomach
Bonnie J
|
581.54 | | CSC32::M_VALENZA | RMH | Wed Dec 19 1990 17:35 | 5 |
| I guess that rules out making any references to "The Cook, the Thief,
his Wife, and her Lover" (the most revolting movie I have ever seen, by
the way).
-- Mike
|
581.55 | strange tastes... | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | Food, Shelter & Diamonds | Thu Dec 20 1990 09:56 | 7 |
| re .54, someone in the Movies notesfile rated "The Cook, the THief, his
Wife, and her Lover" as one of their all-time favorite movies, which
amazes me!! (another womannoter warned me not to see it, saying it
would make me sick...right, jwhite?) :-)
Lorna
|
581.56 | | CSC32::M_VALENZA | RMH | Thu Dec 20 1990 10:17 | 8 |
| I went up to Denver one day last summer with the intention of
participating in a sort of "art" film viewing marathon, but I made the
mistake of deciding to watch "The Cook, the Thief, his Wife, and her
Lover" first. I came out of the theater so disgusted, and so shaken,
that I cancelled my plans of seeing any more movies that day. I have
never hated a movie more in my entire life than I hated that one.
-- Mike
|
581.57 | ugh! | NRADM::ROBINSON | did i tell you this already??? | Thu Dec 20 1990 11:59 | 6 |
|
me too!! I was so revolted!! I don't see how anyone can
find this to be a `black comedy'????? the only redeeming
quality was the boy's voice...
|
581.58 | Soviet hardships | CONFG5::WALKER | | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:08 | 6 |
| I kind of watched whoozit's "Sex in the Soviet Union" last night. What
I remember was that intimacy was really difficult for Soviets: no
privacy, NO birthcontrol, many, many abortions for many women: more than
30 for some, because of the lack of birthcontrol.
Briana
|
581.59 | I'd not want it much either under those circumstances | BTOVT::THIGPEN_S | freedom: not a gift, but a choice | Thu Dec 20 1990 12:28 | 11 |
| Koppel's "Sex in the Soviet Union" also mentioned exhaustion as a
reason women were not interested in sex too much. I also thought that,
given the abysmal state of birth control, to have sex in the Soviet
Union is very often to get pregnant. Then you are faced with the ugly
choice of having (another) child to raise in a 3 room 1-bath apt you
are sharing with 2 other families, or to abort the child.
Gah.
Am I ever glad my ancestors had the sense/good luck to get out of
Eastern Europe and Russia at the turn of the century!
|
581.60 | circumsision | TENERE::MCDONALD | | Wed Dec 26 1990 12:39 | 4 |
| Another worldy difference:
CIRCUMSISION . The men in German & France (at least) are not
circumsised.
|
581.62 | | TENERE::MCDONALD | | Thu Dec 27 1990 12:52 | 5 |
| re -1.
Well I did read a study which found that women who had sex only with
circumcised men had lower rates of Cancer of the uterus than women
who slept with uncircumcised men. I do not remember the exact figures,
so maybe there's still something to be said for circumcision.
|
581.63 | | OXNARD::HAYNES | Charles Haynes | Thu Dec 27 1990 13:37 | 8 |
| In my experience, electronic discussions of circumcision - no matter how well
intentioned - quickly devolve into heat and argument. I would suggest we
quarantine this discussion NOW by creating a new topic on the subject. I will
not do it personally, since I find the notion of a man creating a topic on
circumcision in Womannotes faintly absurd... For a full, flame filled,
"discussion" on the subject see Mennotes.
-- Charles
|
581.64 | pointer | LEZAH::BOBBITT | trial by stone | Thu Dec 27 1990 13:49 | 7 |
| the conversation he mentioned is at:
MENNOTES
56 - circumcision
-Jody
|
581.65 | Women in Dresses, Underwear?? | CSC32::DUBOIS | The early bird gets worms | Fri Jan 25 1991 15:12 | 12 |
| I have questions going back to the hygiene, etc topic.
When I stepped into my first restroom in France, what I found was a small
hole in the ground with two ceramic "footprints" built in. I'm assuming other
places in the world have these, and that they *don't* have the water
availability that has been discussed. In those places, and in the places
*with* water but nothing to dry with, do most of the women wear dresses
of some kind, and does that make it easier to "drip dry"? Also do women
all over the world wear underwear, or do many countries have a woman's
costume of just being a dress with no underwear/undergarments?
Carol
|
581.66 | | THEALE::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Mon Jan 28 1991 05:07 | 21 |
|
>When I stepped into my first restroom in France, what I found was a small
>hole in the ground with two ceramic "footprints" built in. I'm assuming other
>places in the world have these, and that they *don't* have the water
>availability that has been discussed. In those places, and in the places
>*with* water but nothing to dry with, do most of the women wear dresses
>of some kind, and does that make it easier to "drip dry"? Also do women
>all over the world wear underwear, or do many countries have a woman's
>costume of just being a dress with no underwear/undergarments?
It's not lack of water - normally the "public" loos are like this, but
those in restaurants and hotels are not, as they are designed more for
tourists.
If you use the "footprints" often enough, then you get used to the
balance required, and you always remember your own loo paper!
Heather
|
581.67 | | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante divorcee | Tue Jan 29 1991 14:08 | 6 |
| I think what Carol is getting at is that most US women would have a hard time in
pantyhose and underwear using something of this design.
BTW, I've used loo papaer in England, YIKES, that stuff is like wax paper. My
favorite was in Kew Gardens where there was a little stamped picture of the
royal crest on each piece. liesl
|
581.68 | Underwear? "Panties"? | CSC32::DUBOIS | The early bird gets worms | Tue Jan 29 1991 18:55 | 5 |
| Basically, I want to know that if women are expected to drip-dry,
then do most of the women in that culture wear underwear or not
(especially in dresses)?
Carol
|
581.69 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Wed Jan 30 1991 05:07 | 29 |
|
>I think what Carol is getting at is that most US women would have a hard time in
>pantyhose and underwear using something of this design.
Ah well, in France, it's usually so warm that you have bare legs,
however, I never been able to manage pantyhose, I think they are one
of the most awkward and rediculous pieces of clothing ever invented.
I've never been able to manage them in "ordinary" circumstances. I
had to buy some when I was in Maryland, until I could find a place
to buy stockings, I couldn't believe they were so difficult to get
hold of. Most places in the UK that sell pantyhose (tights) also sell
stockings, including places like 7-11's (and the shop here in DECpark).
Stockings are so much nicer and easier - and don't come with the above
problems.
But as I said, these type of loos are not common, and usually public
loos, I normally go to a bar/restaurant, have a drink, and use their
loos
>BTW, I've used loo papaer in England, YIKES, that stuff is like wax paper. My
>favorite was in Kew Gardens where there was a little stamped picture of the
>royal crest on each piece. liesl
Err, I also take my own loo paper in the UK if I think I may have to
use public loos. You will find the soft paper in most hotels/pubs..etc,
but some still use the Jayes paper - as it's medicated, it's meant to be
more hygienic. (It beats a newspaper!).
Heather
|
581.70 | | TINCUP::KOLBE | The dilettante divorcee | Wed Jan 30 1991 14:40 | 11 |
| Total rathole:
I hate the word "panties" to refer to women's underpants. Yuck, it's like we
were little girls. I can't speak for the rest of you but mine don't have ruffles
over the bottom or plastic liners.
Heather, I agree with you about pantyhose but I hate stockings too. If I wear a
dress it's with bare legs or boots. I like knee socks too.
Tip: If you are going to be where you must "drip dry" often then trim the old
pube hairs so they don't get wet. :*) liesl
|
581.71 | i know... | WRKSYS::STHILAIRE | this must be what it's all about | Wed Jan 30 1991 15:26 | 8 |
| re .70, I also hate the word "panties" for women's underpants. I think
it sounds vaguely nasty for some reason. :-)
Although, I prefer pantyhose to stockings. To me pantyhose are more
comfortable than bothering with garters, which I think feel awful on.
Lorna
|
581.72 | | CSC32::DUBOIS | The early bird gets worms | Wed Jan 30 1991 16:11 | 8 |
| All right, all right! I won't use the word "panties" any more! :-)
I was trying to make a distinction between "underwear" and all undergarments,
like bras.
Do women wear underwear in India, Pakistan, Korea, China, Thailand, Kenya,
etc? Especially in the rural areas?
Carol
|
581.73 | vague memories | WMOIS::B_REINKE | she is a 'red haired baby-woman' | Wed Jan 30 1991 18:48 | 26 |
| Carol
I had a friend from Nepal years ago in grad school, I'm trying to
remember what she said about under garments.
I believe that the sari was origianlly a single garment and that
the top and anythin underneath came later and with the upper classes
originally.
Manisha if you are reading this can you help me withthe details.?
But the basic answer from what i've read is that no, poor women
in any culture don't wear under garments of any kind.
Potentially offensive material follows:
I recall someone mentioning in an earlier version of =wn= (my
memory wants to 'blame' Ian Philpott for this) about the fact
that churches in medieval periods had to sweep out bundles of
dust and hair that fell from the privates of poor women after
Mass. They were called '-------' mice.
Bonnie
|
581.74 | | BRABAM::PHILPOTT | Col I F 'Tsingtao Dhum' Philpott | Thu Jan 31 1991 05:09 | 15 |
|
Wasn't me Bonnie: can't say I've ever heard that story before... In any case
it sounds unlikely since underwear was adopted by the poor long before the
wealthy (as late as a hundred years ago wearing underwear was considered a
sign of slovenliness by the upper classes in Britain, and only the poor did
so.)
As for the topic: rural Thai women wear both pants and bra under their clothes
(and think farang women who go braless because of the heat are quite shameless)
personally "Pantie" implies smallness, not feminity or girlishness. Young girls
wear [gym-]knickers and wouldn't be allowed to wear anything so skimpy as a
panty... of course in America knickers are outerwear, I know.
/. Ian .\
|
581.75 | | SUBURB::THOMASH | The Devon Dumpling | Thu Jan 31 1991 08:17 | 19 |
|
Underpants ????? yuck!
They're those mens white Y fronts that reach to (and sometimes past)
the waist.
I can't remember what's actually written on the shelves in
stores for womens underwear, I'll check next time.
I usually call them knickers.
I have heard them called briefs or panties.
I have never heard womens underwear to be refered to as underpants.
and pantyhose - this name is not used here either - they're called
tights.
(we do call socks, socks tho')
Heather
|
581.76 | some do, some don't | CADSE::KHER | | Thu Jan 31 1991 14:16 | 8 |
| A lot of Indian women, particularly in the rural areas, don't wear
underwear. Neither do the dhoti-clad men. But most urban people do.
Pantyhose and stockings are unheard of.
I think whether one wears underwear or not is irrelevent. The point is
we, as a culture, are just not into being dry and deoodorized all the
time.
manisha
|
581.77 | Good things come in small packages | IE0010::MALING | Mirthquake! | Thu Jan 31 1991 17:34 | 6 |
| > Pantie implies smallness
Oh no! My husband refers to his undershorts as "panties".
It always cracks me up when he does that. :-)
Mary
|
581.78 | "underpants" Bleeucchh | AYOV27::TWASON | | Fri Feb 01 1991 05:24 | 12 |
| I think they're just known as "womens briefs" Heather, I am not
too sure though. I usually just call them knickers.
But I can tell you that men's are known as (or labelled as)
"slips".:-))
Tracy W.
|